Posted by: tahir
Me & Rios - 02/03/2006 10:23
Can't believe it, I've killed my flipping Carbon's scroll wheel now, just a short drop (in it's case) onto a wooden floor, no more than 3 feet and now it scrolls no more....
When are there going to be some Rio based Sigmatel products out there, or do I have to go to the dark side and get iPodded?
Posted by: Roger
Re: Me & Rio's - 02/03/2006 10:36
Apostrophe Police, sir. Do you know why I've pulled you over?
Posted by: tahir
Re: Me & Rio's - 02/03/2006 10:40
Grammar, wossat? Just out of interest could you point out what I'm being pulled over for?
Posted by: tahir
Re: Me & Rio's - 02/03/2006 11:24
This is bugging me now, should it be Rios' ?
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Me & Rio's - 02/03/2006 19:43
Nope. Just "Rios". "Rios" = "more than one Rio". "Rio's" = "the following thing belongs to Rio". "Rios'" == "The following thing belongs to more than one Rio".
"All three of my Rios have died. My most recent Rio's scroll wheel broke. I think that the Rios' quality is not very good."
Apostrophes are (basically) never used to pluralize. (Only in the case where the thing you're pluralizing is an abbreviation, like "PC's", and even that is very often frowned upon.)
Of course, it can also be used to abbreviate "is", like "Rio's" = "Rio is".
"This Rio's a piece of junk."
Posted by: petteri
Re: Me & Rio's - 02/03/2006 20:14
My Karma's wheel has just broken. I'll attempt a fix, although I'd really like to replace it with a new Sigmatel based player. So how long must we all wait for a Karma worthy replacement?
I sincerely hope the above is correct from a grammer standpoint!
Posted by: music
Re: Me & Rio's - 04/03/2006 01:32
OK. Oh man, I didn't want to do this, but you asked....
Since we've racked up three dangling ones so far, here goes.
Quote:
short drop (in it's case)
Should be its case
That's possessive, as opposed to "it's" meaning "it is".
Quote:
I sincerely hope the above is correct from a grammer standpoint!
grammar
Quote:
how long must we all wait for a Karma worthy replacement?
It should be Karma-worthy replacement because it is a compound adjective before the noun. Curiously, it's OK to say "a replacement which is Karma worthy" when it comes after the noun. If you really want to know.
But there's some wiggle room here since the hyphen seems to be dying out despite a slight loss in clarity.
(E.g. "New age-discrimination rules" versus "New-age discrimination rules". But how frequently do we run across cases like that?)
Hmmmm, 7:30 on a Friday. Time for me to go get a beer -- and a life. 
Posted by: tahir
Re: Me & Rio's - 05/03/2006 06:32
Thanks guys, I'm glad I asked, although I doubt very much that your response'll affect in anyway my terrible grammar and punctuation.
