Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults

Posted by: mlord

Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults - 13/04/2002 09:38

Hijack v254 is now out in the usual place.

This version is mainly just an update to incorporate tfabris's new default settings for the Low/Medium/High "Auto Volume Adjust" settings.

The new defaults sound (to me) like a major improvement over the original ad-hoc settings. And if you don't like'em, use config.ini settings to override them with your own fav's.

And a reminder: Don't expect much else to happen on the Hijack front until at least June-2002. I'm now busy with a major (for me) Linux kernel development contract: lot's of fun work, but no time for Hijack work.

Plus I just got my new digicam kit (Canon EOS D60 etc..), and rock-climbing season is now here in the Great White North, so time may be scarce until the snow flies again.

Cheers

Mark
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults - 13/04/2002 11:26

Mark, did you also include Genixia's latest patch to remove some extra debug messages on the serial port when changing EQ settings?
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults - 13/04/2002 11:29

By the way, his patch is located here in case you need a place to get it.
Posted by: genixia

Re: Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults - 13/04/2002 11:44

Yeah, Mark commented out the offending printk..
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults - 13/04/2002 16:04

The printk() got commented out.

Cheers
Posted by: SE_Sport_Driver

Re: Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults - 13/04/2002 18:12

Mark, we missed you. Thanks for dropping in and good climbing!
Posted by: fede

Re: Hijack v254: Improved VolAdj defaults - 13/04/2002 22:49

That is a very nice camera. Those just came out didn't they. I have a friend who bought a D30 a couple of months ago because he was in a hurry. Now he is about to get the D60 and I will likely get his D30 for cheap. I hope you enjoy it.
Posted by: mlord

EOS-D60 - 14/04/2002 06:34

>That is a very nice camera. Those just came out didn't they.

Yes, quite nice. They just hit the streets a couple of weeks ago, and are only now becoming less scarce.

So far only two major bugs:

(1) the focus-assist lamp sometimes fools the auto-exposure calculation, resulting in under-exposed pictures.

(2) the focus-indicator LEDs in the viewfinder frequently fool the auto-exposure calculation, resulting in under-exposed pictures.

Apart from those, the capture speed is excellent, the playback speed sucks, and the auto-focus is leagues better than my older Nikon-E990.

Cheers
Posted by: tfabris

Re: EOS-D60 - 14/04/2002 10:55

I can understand (1) but not (2).
Posted by: mlord

Re: EOS-D60 - 14/04/2002 11:15

The D60 has three little rectangles visible through the viewfinder, which mark the exact positions for the "focus points" for the auto-focus mechanism. One or more of these will light up in red when focus is achieved. This red illumination unfortunately is also "seen" by the auto-exposure logic, so it sometimes believes the subject matter to be brighter than it really is..

Duh!
Posted by: genixia

Re: EOS-D60 - 14/04/2002 18:57

LOL...That's the sort of thing that I'd code..

...Well, maybe even I wouldn't do that.

Posted by: tfabris

Re: EOS-D60 - 14/04/2002 20:07

Right, which is what I don't get. You would think that the optical "order" of things in the camera would be designed so that the indicator LEDs were behind the exposure sensors. I don't see why the indicators need to be that far "forward" in the light path. Makes no sense that they'd design the camera that way?
Posted by: mlord

Re: EOS-D60 - 14/04/2002 22:00

The focus indicator lights work by projection onto the focus screen, which is visible in both directions: towards the eyepiece, and towards the exposure meter..

Apparently it happens with some film cameras as well. But I consider it just a plain goof by Canon.

Cheers
Posted by: tfabris

Re: EOS-D60 - 15/04/2002 09:10

Uh, yeah. "oops".