Hijack 275

Posted by: teemcbee

Hijack 275 - 14/06/2002 00:24

i already posted this in the bugs-thread...

i've got 2.0 beta11 and hijack 275 installed. today i wanted to upload some new songs and i always get a synchronisation error.

the error appears when trying to upload new tunes: i get the following details on the warnings:

-Chocolate Salty Balls could not be synchronized., An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (error 0x80072746)
- Chuckie Chan could not be synchronized., Read on socket failed (error 0x8004003d)
- I Stand Accused (Long Version) could not be synchronized., An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine. (error 0x80072745)
...


i installed the 2.0b11-kernel then and tried a sync - it went ok. (with the same ammount of data to sync)

fyi
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hijack 275 - 14/06/2002 06:14

Those are Microsoft (windows) error codes.

-ml
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hijack 275 - 14/06/2002 11:04

Those are Microsoft (windows) error codes.

Hmm. I can't seem to properly translate these codes based on the instructions in Roger's synch errors page. His page is only for the negative numbers all starting with FF.

Mark, Tee claims that the data can be transferred fine without hijack, but errors with hijack installed. The text of the error messages seems to indicate some kind of network data transfer failure during the upload.

Anyone able to translate these errors from some sort of internal Windows table?

0x80072746
0x8004003d
0x80072745


Posted by: mlord

Re: Hijack 275 - 14/06/2002 11:14

Sounds like a one-time occurance to me. Whatever was wrong got cleared up, and the same upload would probably work with or without Hijack installed at this point.

If it were an issue with Hijack, more than one person would be having trouble at this point.

Note that Hijack has no code along the paths that were failing, and the "bug report" didn't include anything useful like a serial port log, which would have more clearly identified the culprit.

Cheers
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hijack 275 - 14/06/2002 11:33

Fair enough.
Posted by: Roger

Re: Hijack 275 - 17/06/2002 05:21

They might be Windows error codes, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't the player that went bang.
Posted by: Roger

Re: Hijack 275 - 17/06/2002 05:27

Anyone able to translate these errors from some sort of internal Windows table?

Errlook.exe, included with Visual C++ will work. Alternatively, try HRPlus, here:

http://www.simtel.net/pub/pd/8407.html