SSSCA

Posted by: Terminator

SSSCA - 10/09/2001 12:47

Just read about this on another site. This new law would force all devices that hold bits and bytes of information to have mandatory copyright protection. Please check it out and sign it if you agree.

http://www.petitiononline.com/SSSCA/petition.html

Further links can be found by reading ther rest of the thread.

Sean

Note: This petition is for people living in the US.



Edited by Terminator on 10/09/01 09:38 PM.

Posted by: tms13

Re: SSSCA - 10/09/2001 13:08

In reply to:

Please check it out and sign it if you agree.

http://www.petitiononline.com/SSSCA/petition.html




This appears to be a petition for US citizens only (just to save others the bother of finding out...)

I didn't find links to the proposed legislation

--
Toby Speight - 040103385
Posted by: Terminator

Re: SSSCA - 10/09/2001 13:15

Heres the bill itself:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/hollings.090701.html

Coverage of it from wired news: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46655,00.html

Slashdot coverage:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/08/0238200&mode=thread

Sean



Posted by: EngelenH

Re: SSSCA - 10/09/2001 16:46

US or not, tell them they can kiss my furry behind before I accept something like that.

cheers

Mk2 - Blue & Red - 080000431
Posted by: tfabris

Re: SSSCA - 10/09/2001 17:00

Heh, this is interesting.

When are these boneheads going to realize... you can't stop media copying. Whether it's with analog or digital means, things are going to get copied. No matter how hard it's copy-protected, there will be ways around it. Doesn't matter if it's a movie, a computer game, a song, or a book. Copying happens, period.

They're expending their energies in the wrong direction, methinks.

I don't think this bill will fly, but even if it does, it'll be no different than any other copy protection: It just means a slight inconvenience for serious pirates trying to seriously pirate something, and a similar slight inconvenience for legitimate users trying to legitmately use the copy-protected media.

The difference is that this one seems to place a big inconvenience on hardware and software manufacturers. You think the industry is going to like that kind of regulation? A system which doesn't improve their bottom line (copying will still happen), but places a burden on both the companies and the legitimage users?

Nah, I'm not worried. This one will fizzle. Then we'll get back to the real questions of how to properly capitalize on the limitless possibilities provided by new media technologies. Smart companies will pull their heads out of the sand and stop trying to think inside the little boxes defined by existing marketing and distribution machines...

___________
Tony Fabris
Posted by: DWallach

Re: SSSCA - 11/09/2001 12:44

Nah, I'm not worried. This one will fizzle.

I wish I shared your optimism. Luckily, I have an article on this exact topic to appear shortly in IEEE Computer. I have a draft copy here if any wants to read it and possibly give me any feedback.

I appologize in advance for the ugly formatting. The magazine editors use Microsoft Word and this is their styling passed through Word's HTML converter.

Please don't spread this URL around. I want the article to "appear" first in the magazine and then, if it does, to get Slashdotted from there.

Thanks.