SpamAssassin

Posted by: lectric

SpamAssassin - 10/01/2003 23:21

Just had to say that SpamAssassin kicks royal a$$. It trapped 3000 spam messages coming into my server in 3 days alone. With only 4 mistakes. And that was with VERY little tweaking. Added some teaks, even better. Totally impressed.
Posted by: boxer

Re: SpamAssassin - 11/01/2003 11:29

Could you put a link on, or have I missed it elsewhere - looks like just what I'm looking for?
Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 11/01/2003 11:43

Spamassassin
Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 11/01/2003 11:53

Oh, and to tie it in I use Mailscanner

Mailscanner is also useful because it wraps sophos into mail filtering as well.
Posted by: Daria

Re: SpamAssassin - 11/01/2003 12:47

I love it, but too bad spamd is such a pig. My machine was off due to scheduled power outage for 5 hours and the deluge of mail when it came up sent the load to 45!
Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 12/01/2003 19:52

Scheduled power outage?! Might I ask why? Oh, and my box is a dual Celeron 300, never seems to mind. Is your SpamAssassin Max size set to 50000 or so?
Posted by: xanatos

Re: SpamAssassin - 13/01/2003 03:01

Yeah, SpamAssassin is pretty sweet. I'm using it on my mail server with postfix and I love it to death.

Haven't had any false positives, but had a few low score spams make it through. I still gotta play with the confiig and see what else I can get it to do, and try and filter out more things without creating any false positives.

I and my users are totally loving it
Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 13/01/2003 07:45

When I get a low score through, I add it to the blacklist. Easy, done. Never happens again from that domain.
Attached is my blacklist so far. It lives in /etc/mail/spamassassin/ on my machine. Prolly the same on yours.

Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 13/01/2003 07:47

Dammit... from habit I hit continue b4 I attached. Here is the attachment:
Posted by: Daria

Re: SpamAssassin - 13/01/2003 09:04

The building I work in was getting an aux generator attached but they needed to take power offline to do it. The machine's under a desk in my office.

I have no idea, I should find out.

I used to have a dual celeron 300; I got the CPUs from computernerd long, long ago. I upgraded the bios and both CPUs and it's now a dual p3 750, which means it's still viable as my desktop/fileserver at home.
Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 13/01/2003 14:58

Ahhhh.... I see. We've had generator power for years... The server room was originally the 911 dispatch room, so 90% of the outlets are generator backups.

Yeah, I could easily upgrade the processors in the mail server, but so far it never ever has an issue with speed. (knock on wood) We currently have 176 users. Not a tremendous amount, but enough.
Posted by: tanstaafl.

Re: SpamAssassin - 13/01/2003 15:48

Just had to say that SpamAssassin kicks royal a$$.

If you're running Unix.

If you're running a plain vanilla standalone system: Win98SE, POP3 mail, and Netscape 4.x, your options are considerably limited and setup is pretty technical.

tanstaafl.

Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 13/01/2003 20:45

Could that be because win98se was never ever intended to act as a server platform in any way?
Posted by: andy

Re: SpamAssassin - 14/01/2003 03:56

Could that be because win98se was never ever intended to act as a server platform in any way?

No, it's not because Win98 wasn't designed to be a server, it because SpamAssassin was designed to run on a server.
Posted by: lectric

Re: SpamAssassin - 14/01/2003 04:33

I kinda thought that was exactly what I was saying...
Posted by: tanstaafl.

Re: SpamAssassin - 14/01/2003 18:51

it because SpamAssassin was designed to run on a server.

Ah! That's what I didn't know. I thought it was just a mail filter to run on my home PC, but of course it really won't work very well for that, will it?

tanstaafl.
Posted by: Roger

Re: SpamAssassin - 15/01/2003 02:51

http://www.cloudmark.com/products/spamnet/

...works with Outlook, not OE, but it's a client-side spam filter that uses the SpamNet spam database.
Posted by: EDub

Re: SpamAssassin - 15/01/2003 08:49

I use SpamCops RBL list. It works great and well, is free.
www.spamcop.net

And I'm not running unix but MS Exchange. It blocks over 300 spam a day for a 120 user network. 50,000 since last April.