Hurricane Katrina

Posted by: petteri

Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 14:23

To those living in Louisiana and the gulf coast stay safe! The Eutronix guys are just north of New Orleans, I'm not sure about the geography of the area but I hope you guys are in a safe place if you haven't evacuated. The eye of this storm passed right over the area I live (North Miami-Dade county) as a weak catagory 1 but still did some damage including killing nine people here in south Florida. If you are new to hurricanes, please don't go out and "explore"! Heed all your local warnings and stay indoors!!!
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 14:39

Better yet, get out of the way while you still can! Now at catagory 5 with sustained winds about 175 MPH, you do not want to be anywhere near where this thing hits the land. Plus, given that most of the New Orleans area is below sea level, the storm surge is going to be a nightmare.
Posted by: g_attrill

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 14:54

Yeah, was hoping everybody was out of the way, had Fox News on here all day and it looks like a biggie (I know, I know, but the UK news channels aren't giving it a lot of coverage)

Funnily enough I did a bit of reading on New Orleans a couple of months back and saw the pretty dodgy situation it could be in.

Gareth
Posted by: Laura

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 14:54

And for those people that do have to evacuate, please take your pets with you! So many are killed and lost during hurricanes, it's not just the people who are effected.
Posted by: petteri

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 17:12

Quote:
And for those people that do have to evacuate, please take your pets with you! So many are killed and lost during hurricanes, it's not just the people who are effected.


Glad you mentioned that! One great thing here in Florida is that they are starting to set-up shelters for those people with pets. The first one was opened this season with Katrina. So far I think it is just one shelter in Broward (Ft. Lauderdale, north of Miami) but more are expected to open. These shelters for ONLY for those people with pets.

Of course if you are in an evacuation zone leave!!! Many here in Florida go out to "explore" when the eye (usually clam) passes over only to be struck by suprise when the wind picks up again, or are hurt or killed by downed power lines and other threats.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 18:34

This storm has all the ingredients for a serious tragedy. It's massive in scale, it's moving very slowly, the air pressure is among the lowest for any hurricane on record, the water temperature is high, and the city is 6+ feet below sea level, with water on all sides.

Of course anything can happen at this point, but it is very much within the realm of possibility that New Orleans may not exist after this storm. I hope that nobody in the storm's path is thinking that just "staying indoors" is going to be enough. Of course some will get stuck and have to hang out at the Superdome or other shelters, but I hope everyone's taking this one more seriously than many in Florida did with some of last year's storms.

Best of luck to anyone here who's directly affected or has family/friends in the area.
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 19:09

On animated satelite imagery it looks like it is going straight for New Orleans. Good luck, people!
Posted by: petteri

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 20:52

Quote:
I hope that nobody in the storm's path is thinking that just "staying indoors" is going to be enough. Of course some will get stuck and have to hang out at the Superdome or other shelters, but I hope everyone's taking this one more seriously than many in Florida did with some of last year's storms.


Agreed by staying indoors, I meant those who are in fringe areas of the storm. This storm is much too powerful to play games with. Anyone in or near it's path should be on their way out of harms way at this point. Again best of luck to those in the affected areas.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 28/08/2005 22:40

I hope they're putting out the "worst case" here:

http://weather.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/iwszone?Sites=:laz069

MOST OF THE AREA WILL BE UNINHABITABLE FOR WEEKS...PERHAPS LONGER. AT
LEAST ONE HALF OF WELL CONSTRUCTED HOMES WILL HAVE ROOF AND WALL
FAILURE. ALL GABLED ROOFS WILL FAIL...LEAVING THOSE HOMES SEVERELY
DAMAGED OR DESTROYED.

THE MAJORITY OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WILL BECOME NON FUNCTIONAL.
PARTIAL TO COMPLETE WALL AND ROOF FAILURE IS EXPECTED. ALL WOOD
FRAMED LOW RISING APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESTROYED. CONCRETE
BLOCK LOW RISE APARTMENTS WILL SUSTAIN MAJOR DAMAGE...INCLUDING SOME
WALL AND ROOF FAILURE.

HIGH RISE OFFICE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL SWAY DANGEROUSLY...A
FEW TO THE POINT OF TOTAL COLLAPSE. ALL WINDOWS WILL BLOW OUT.

AIRBORNE DEBRIS WILL BE WIDESPREAD...AND MAY INCLUDE HEAVY ITEMS SUCH
AS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES AND EVEN LIGHT VEHICLES. SPORT UTILITY
VEHICLES AND LIGHT TRUCKS WILL BE MOVED. THE BLOWN DEBRIS WILL CREATE
ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTION. PERSONS...PETS...AND LIVESTOCK EXPOSED TO THE
WINDS WILL FACE CERTAIN DEATH IF STRUCK.

POWER OUTAGES WILL LAST FOR WEEKS...AS MOST POWER POLES WILL BE DOWN
AND TRANSFORMERS DESTROYED. WATER SHORTAGES WILL MAKE HUMAN SUFFERING
INCREDIBLE BY MODERN STANDARDS.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF NATIVE TREES WILL BE SNAPPED OR UPROOTED. ONLY
THE HEARTIEST WILL REMAIN STANDING...BUT BE TOTALLY DEFOLIATED. FEW
CROPS WILL REMAIN. LIVESTOCK LEFT EXPOSED TO THE WINDS WILL BE
KILLED.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 01:00

Well, I always wanted to see New Orelans. I guess I never will now. This is truly an amazing thought. The town is going to cease to exist as we know it today. Scary, and very sad.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 01:18

Quote:
Well, I always wanted to see New Orelans. I guess I never will now. This is truly an amazing thought. The town is going to cease to exist as we know it today. Scary, and very sad.

As fate would have it, I'm scheduled to be in New Orleans 9/19-9/22 for FloCon 2005. Something tells me that we will be rescheduling/cancelling it this year.

I, too, have never seen N'awlins, and it's very sad to think that I might never see it in any recognizable form. Of course, the primary concern is for the lives that are in harm's way, but it's also a city with a huge cultural significance, and it's hard to believe that could be reconstructed, either on the same site, or anywhere else.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 01:20

Pray hard for us. I'm currently bunkering down at city hall. Sometimes it sucks to be "essential personnel". They are estinmating the storm surge as high as 30 feet with another 9 feet of wave action on top of that. Just to give an idea of what could (probably will) happen, the greater New Orleans area is surrounded by a levee system that is 14 feet tall. New Orleans is 10 feet below sea level. If water is at 40 feet, that means it's 26 feet ABOVE the levee. That levee system will do squat. Much of the area will be covered with at least 15 feet of water, obliterating most homes. Just so you know, there are htousands still in the city that refused to evacuate. I don't want to be around for cleanup, but I guess I will be. The winds are right now beginning to pick up to the point that power lines are leaning over and creaking. Next time I post, hopefully it will be to say that I'm still alive. Ya'll have a good one and please please keep us in your prayers for the next 12 hours or so. At this point, it's the only thing that can help. I had never been scared of a hurricane before, but this one has me terrified at the possibility of what could happen. Cya.

Lec
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 01:28

You are definitely in our thoughts and prayers. Talk to you after it's over.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 01:30

Thanks. It really doesn mean a lot.
Posted by: shadow45

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 01:59

I went through hurricane Charley, it had 180mph+ gusts. It was something truly amazing.

It took half the roof of my condo.. i was at work though, at a hospital (like you, i had to work during the storm) but to have a nice safe brick bldg to watch it from was something to be grateful for.

My town is maybe 3-6 feet above sea level, and we were expecting a one-two combo of wind and surge/rain but never got any rising waters. the storm moved that fast.

god speed and good luck!!
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 04:24

I'm very concerned for the thousands holing up in the superdome. What if that structure doesn't withstand the storm?
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 04:37

This sounds totally surreal, as if describing dangers to an outpost on some distant wild planet. And yet it is terribly real, with some of our own in the middle of this...

Once more, I wish you best of luck (that's all that this non-believer can offer )
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 06:02

Most of my family that lives in New Orleans took off a couple of days ago and are staying with family in Houston and Baton Rouge. My cousin however is on the New Orleans Police force... and is having to stay. Baton Rouge is apparently also pretty freaked and boarded up. I remember riding out hurricane Andrew and watching a garbage can go flying down my street horizontally at a sustained 5 feet above ground, and the ensuing lack of power for 2.5 weeks. My family also lost a house in Gulf Breeze to hurricanes... twice in the past 10 years and it was just partially repaired before the last one hit and redid the damage times 3... and now this. Is it just me or is the whole hurricane frequency off the charts?

We can only hope this one is another false alarm and won't do the expected damage... seeing New Orleans under water would be an incredible disaster, the long term effects of which are pretty hard to imagine... the best description I've read said something like New Orleans becoming a 30 ft deep toxic lake filled with petroleum and sewage. Man I hope that sucker dies fast.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 06:26

There is an interesting article in the Houston Chronicle a few years back. FEMA warned in mid 2001 that a hurricane in New Orleans as among the "three likeliest, most castastrophic disasters facing this country." The other two: A terrorist attack in New York, and a major earthquake in San Francisco. So that is two out of three now. Scary.

http://www.hurricane.lsu.edu/_in_the_news/houston.htm

Good luck Lectric. I'm sorry you are going to be there for this; it may be the worst natural disaster in American history.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 06:49

Then again... this is the exact same stuff they were saying earlier this year on the news channels, who love to sensationalize, about Dennis. Just hope they are wrong yet again.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 14:29

Quote:
who love to sensationalize


Yeah, it's increasingly looking like that is the case, and I got suckered into it. I should know better. I am very glad that the worst apparently did not come true and New Orleans should be able to bounce back.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 14:55

Quote:

Yeah, it's increasingly looking like that is the case, and I got suckered into it.


I don't think this is the media sensationalizing. This is a case of a storm that had serious potential that ended up taking a slight turn and losing a little bit of steam. It's still dangerous.

I think the doomsday predictions by the hurricane watchers were on the "worst case" side to minimize the number of idiots who stuck behind and got themselves killed. In this day and age, with people throwing "hurricane parties," you have to be a little long on your estimates. Otherwise, if they said "it'll probably be okay, just be careful" nobody would take it seriously.

Of course, I do get sickened by the way news organizations milk the story with their flashy "Your Hurricane Headquarters" graphics and their hyperbole, but in this case, I think the potential was definitely there, and still is to some extent.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 15:10

Quote:

I think the doomsday predictions by the hurricane watchers were on the "worst case" side to minimize the number of idiots who stuck behind and got themselves killed.


More likely just to protect themselves from lawsuits. Few people are ever sued for overestimating damage potential, even though it sometimes causes more civil disruption than might have been necessary.

Dunno about this case, though. Looks scary on the satellite imagery.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 15:18

Well, in this case, whether it was to avoid litigation or in a sincere desire to protect human life, I'm okay with the decision. "Civil disruption" pales in comparison to a humanitarian disaster that could result from complacency. Mother nature doesn't fsck around.
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 15:28

There is a really great shot of the storm on the Astronomy Picture of the Day web site.
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 16:51

Wow -- truly amazing satellite photo. I've been to New Orleans several times and always had a great time. The food, alone, is all the reason you need to go. The initial photos of flooding look a whole lot like what Houston had a couple years back in Tropical Storm Allison. If that's the worst of it for New Orleans, they'll probably consider themselves very lucky.

EDIT: I looked through all the photo spreads on the NYTimes home page. Looks like the damage in New Orleans is far worse than what we had here. Look at those pictures and tell me about the bravery / insanity of the photographers taking them. Stuff flying through the air, rain coming down heavy, and the last thing I'm going to be doing is reaching for my shiny, expensive digital camera.
Posted by: frog51

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 18:00

Wow - I'm always amazed at the power of these things, just because of the spin and low pressure. Back home we regularly have 150 mph plus winds (twice over 200mph in the last 30 years) and the worst we ever got was the odd roof tile removed, and bus toppled.

But that is just from constant westerlies...

Think I'd not cope very well with a hurricane...my reflexes would assume I'd be fine...and then I'd probably not be!

I hope all of you based there are okay!
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 18:39

I've heard that gas prices are expected to go up an average of 10 cents per gallon tomorrow. Then again...it could be sensationalism. Either way, I'll have a full tank tonight and no regrets tomorrow.
Posted by: visuvius

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 22:18

I was watching CNN and they mentioned how price gouging is starting to pop up. That is just sickening. Is this not illegal? How could people do that to their own neighbors in such difficulty? Is there not immediate (and justified) violence against the price gouger? I don't understand.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 22:21

On the other side of the price gouging, there's plenty of good ol' fashioned American looting going on. Maybe the store owners are raising prices to compensate?

(No, I don't believe that either, but it is just as despicable to steal from honest businesses as it is for businesses to gouge consumers.)
Posted by: shadow45

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 22:52

Price gouging is very illegal after a natural disaster. The morons that even think they can get away with it are quickly fined and often they lose their business license. The law varies from state to state, of course.. but all states have them.

That's why you haven't seen the gas price legitimately rise in Florida Alabama or Mississippi yet- because they are under a state of emergency. in 2 days or so, there will be insane increases- 30 cents++ more a gallon. it was 20c more last year after Ivan and it never went back down. fill your tank now to save a buck.

Any raised prices the day of the storm or even on Day +1 should be reported to your states' Division of Consumer Somethingorother (they have an office next to the ministry of funny walks) if you're under a State of Emergency..

I hate gougers! dieeee

*attached is a photo of the gas station a couple blocks from where I was, after hurricane Charley's eye passed over us last year. freaking amazing ...
Posted by: visuvius

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 29/08/2005 23:32

Heh. I was actually originally going to say, "I can understand looting, but price gouging is just evil", but I edited it out cause, well, looting sucks too.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 00:05

Quote:
I've heard that gas prices are expected to go up an average of 10 cents per gallon tomorrow. Then again...it could be sensationalism. Either way, I'll have a full tank tonight and no regrets tomorrow.


They are already up more than that here in SF.
Posted by: Heather

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 00:10

Same here too. Up from this morning even, by about 15 cents.
Posted by: Attack

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 00:46

I got gas tonight (9 gallons in a CRX) as I was just about empty. I always pay at the pump with my credit card and tonight the receipt didn't print. I went inside and the clerk just got off a call from the owner or manager and said that regular unleaded gas would be going up 40 cents.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 02:29

Quote:
I got gas tonight (9 gallons in a CRX) as I was just about empty. I always pay at the pump with my credit card and tonight the receipt didn't print. I went inside and the clerk just got off a call from the owner or manager and said that regular unleaded gas would be going up 40 cents.


Okay, that freaked me out enough that I just went out to fill my tank (I was riding a quarter tank for the past 3 days hoping prices would drop a bit... stupid hurricane). The Arco I usually go to was at $2.99 for supreme (have to use it... stupid turbo)... while the shell across the street was at $3.13 for supreme. I pulled up to the pumps at the Arco to be met with a hand wriiten "OUT" sign across the medium and supreme buttons. Sweet. So I hit the next cheapest place I know a mile away, a Shell that is at $3.08 for supreme. It's sorta nuts living in a big city where you'll have two Shell's or two Chevron's literally 2 blocks from each other with 10 cent differences in price. City wide the differences can vary 25 cents or more.
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 15:07

I kind of wondered, when I was in New Orleans a few years ago, why they'd built a stadium that looked just like a big concrete bunker. Now that's just looking like an incredibly smart idea.

Peter
Posted by: petteri

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 15:15

Conditions are detoriating inside the dome. I hope they can find a way to relocate those people in there to better conditions. From what I've heard martial law is now in effect for the City of New Orleans....

This is really a sad story.
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 16:32

There are some detailed photos in the New York Times (and elsewhere) that refer, matter-of-factly to their subject being a looter hauling stolen goods through chest-deep water. Strange.

EDIT: Looks like the NYT legal department got to the copy editors. A caption that formerly described the subject of a photo as a looter now simply says "A young man waded through chest-deep flood waters."
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 16:56

There's lots of photos, video, and reports of people looting. One reporter was witnessing it first hand and was asked if they were looting necessities, and he said he saw a few people with diapers and formula, but that almost everyone else was stealing clothes and shoes... trying them on in the street and carrying boxes of stuff away. Could be necessity, but who knows. Sad either way.

Reports from the dome are weird and sketchy... On CNN they reported an hour ago that a man was playing dominos on the second level... calmly got up, walked to the railing, told people below to watch out, and jumped off. Yikes. Toilets are overflowing and it's f'n HOT. Would not want to be there for sure.

My family that evacuated to Houston is heading to stay with others in my family in Baton Rouge and wait it out... it's pretty definite that their houses are under water or severely damaged. Suck.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 17:59

Man. Ugh. Just talked to my Mom. Family is getting really freaked. Their houses are most likely annihilated, they won't have jobs to go back to for months and my cousins have kids and barely scrape by as it is. I can't even fathom what's going to happen to New Orleans and the outlying areas. Most of the population is poor as it is... this is just unreal. I want to go back and help... dunno what I could do though. Stomach is in knots.
Posted by: jmwking

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 18:04

We have an office down there about two blocks off the river at the edge of the French Quarter. We've heard from all but one of our people - she was staying with her mother, who wouldn't leave. One in Metairie who'd decided to wait it out ("a few candles, a bottle of wine, and I'll chase my wife around the house") left just after the first levee gave way.

As you'd expect, many of their houses are partially under water, though their office seems to have been spared the worst of the flooding. No one has been in it yet, though. For all we know, the roof has collapsed.

They've scattered to Houston, New York, Oregon, Fredricksburg (VA), and of course Baton Rouge. After they've all resettled, it'll be interesting to see if we can actually put the office back together again, and if so, how long it'll take. We're planning restore a backup tape from their office (it's in Houston today), recreating their server here in our corporate office, and getting a shell of an office together. Of course, most of that office's business is destination logistics, and I don't think we'll be getting many visitors into the city for a while.

-jk
Posted by: Robotic

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 19:42

Yahoo just bounced an email to Stu at Eutronics back at me.
Hope all is well.
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 30/08/2005 19:47

I would not expect to hear from anyone in the area for a while. Even if they are okay and everything is fine, there are huge power outages everywhere, and most infrastructure has been damaged. And I am sure they have more to worry about than logging in...
Posted by: canuckInOR

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 01:57

Quote:
Man. Ugh. Just talked to my Mom. Family is getting really freaked. Their houses are most likely annihilated,

My gf has an aunt (who I met just last week) in Mississippi whose house is "gone -- as if it were never there."
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 03:55

I find it interesting that public reaction seems to be way less... I guess "interested" is a good word... about this than 9/11. I would be f'n SHOCKED if the death toll isn't higher, and the far reaching economic toll is going to be similar if not way worse. Is it because the enemy here is "nature" and not a group or person?

If you want to depress yourself as I have been doing all day, best photos are here:
http://www.nola.com/hurricane/photos/

and most recent local articles are here:
http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/

Scroll down and read the article titled "City a Woeful Scene"

N.O. is such an impoverished city, I can't even fathom how that many people are going to deal with this financially. The people in the 9th Ward don't have home owners insurance. It's all so f'd up. I mean... there are people in the middle of a flood zone breaking into WalMart and walking past food and water to steal a big screen TV when they have no access to fresh water and food. How f*cked up is the mentality in that community?
Posted by: drakino

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 06:47

Sadly, the biggest public reaction I hear to all this isn't a huge concern for the city, but the fact that the SUV driving populous is now having to brace for even higher gas prices.

There also is no political gain in talking about the hurricane like there was with the terrorist attacks. 9/11 still comes up as a common talking point out of many politically motivated peoples mouthes these days.

It is really sad that people do in general care less when nature causes suffering for people. The reaction for many people here when the tsunami occurred last year was also very dulled.

While I don't personally know anyone in the area, my thoughts are with those here and my friends that do know people in the area. Thankfully it seems most were able to heed the mandatory evacuation warnings, but getting out was only the first step of a life changing event that has occurred.
Posted by: petteri

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 08:41

Quote:

If you want to depress yourself as I have been doing all day, best photos are here:
http://www.nola.com/hurricane/photos/

and most recent local articles are here:
http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/

Scroll down and read the article titled "City a Woeful Scene"

N.O. is such an impoverished city, I can't even fathom how that many people are going to deal with this financially. The people in the 9th Ward don't have home owners insurance. It's all so f'd up. I mean... there are people in the middle of a flood zone breaking into WalMart and walking past food and water to steal a big screen TV when they have no access to fresh water and food. How f*cked up is the mentality in that community?


This is what I've been worring about. The extreme poverty, not just in N.O. but in almost every America city, makes disasters like this much worse that they really need to be. US poverty These people had no way to leave. Were there buses to take people who wanted to leave the city to shelters further north?

The NOLA.com people have been doing a great job, I can only imagine the stress that they must be under. They are literally witnessing the utter collapse of their historic city. I was hoping for more uplifting news this morning, but instead it seems to be even worse.
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 09:02

Greetings!

The difference in reaction is somewhat understandable. 9/11 was an extremely sudden, psychological shock to many people. No warning, the massive destruction (but not on the scale of an entire city) against a civilian target by people that hated ordinary US citizens enough to fly planes into buildings, etc. The shock became a symbol, a rallying cry for politicians from all parties, repeated to the point of insanity by the media. I would think it equivalent to "Remember Pearl Harbor" in terms of the psychological effects. You will note that, unless you know someone or live near the Pentagon, that it is always the WTC that brings the reaction / gets the attention as well.

The scope of devastation in NO (and to other cities along the entire coastline) is extreme. But this event is missing a number of elements that make it such a psychological shock to people. It was cause by a force of nature, it was slow to happen (a longer build up in the media and a slow motion event instead of three seconds of "impact footage"), many people had time to evacuate and it is regional in an area at extremely high risk for such an event (kind of like "The Big One" in California). It will not leave the emotional scarring on most of the nation that 9/11 did. It will be in memory for a long time, but not with the reflex reaction that 9/11 brings.

Now, this makes the event no less horrific, especially for those that live through it, the number of people killed / injured by it, or those that help others to recover from it (i.e., rescue workers, medical staff, police, national guard, etc.). The slow unfolding of events that other parts of the nation lose focus with is part of the severe damage done to those people. The creeping / unstoppable rise of flood waters, probably in the dark (no power / night), the calls for help, being stranded on rooftops, no available food or water, all over a prolonged period of time with little relief. Those who evacuated are lucky not to be in the middle of it, but even they are left wondering what (if anything) is left after all this, if their friends and neighbors are even alive and the question "what next".

There will be a huge economic toll. And I am sure that there will be an outpouring of aid from companies and people in general to help. Perhaps I am just a bit cynical, but it will not be (never be) enough to make the city whole again. But at least it is a start. I am not sure how people will recover psychologically, but most will - eventually. Given time. Financially, well, I do not know.

As for the looting / widescreen TV example. I would not doubt that shock is part of that. Without electricity or broadcasting (I am sure that most local stations were being sent from the city), it is not all that useful. But it is an illusion of normal life - something the thief always wanted... Who knows...
Posted by: CrackersMcCheese

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 09:44

Something that confuses me... how were so many people killed? I can understand people being crushed or drowning inside their homes but I'm reading reports of people being killed in their cars or whilst out walking. What the hell were they doing outside? Do people still have the "oooo I must go and look mentality"?
Posted by: JeffS

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 10:27

Quote:
I find it interesting that public reaction seems to be way less... I guess "interested" is a good word... about this than 9/11. I would be f'n SHOCKED if the death toll isn't higher, and the far reaching economic toll is going to be similar if not way worse. Is it because the enemy here is "nature" and not a group or person?
I agree with Paul's post, plus I think that the angle of comprehending another human being doing something like this is always more sensational. Despite numerous historical lessons to the contrary, it seems we have this innate trust of other human beings- that they are incapable of having such little regard for innocent life. There is little doubt, however, about nature's disregard of innocent life.

A murder is always more sensational that when someone loses his or her life in a storm. We expect the latter, but every time we hear that a human decided the best course of action was to take the life of another human we are intrigued and distrubed.

Also, most of the concern over 911 did not seem to be about those who died. It was about our "loss of security" and "fear of terrorism". At the end of the day, sadly, the question becomes "what does this mean to ME", unless someone you know was invovled.

It is disturbing how we react to such tragedys- it does not speak well of humans, nor of the United States.
Posted by: Ezekiel

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 10:30

Regarding Stu & Eutronix, I've not heard from them (nor do I expect to for weeks & weeks - I sent my cable harnesses to them last week for repairs), but I did find this piece of news regarding their town, Mandeville, LA which is on the northern shore of Lake Pontchartrain:

Quote:
In Mandeville, mostly wind damage
Moday, 9:30 p.m.

Although Mandeville escaped major flooding, the streets were virtually impassable hours after the storm left a dangerous tangle of power lines and pine trees across roadways. Police officers cruised up and down U.S. 190, but were unable to respond to the few calls from residents reporting gas leaks or severe structural damage.

“We’ve got damage everywhere,” Sgt. Ron Ruple said. “Almost every street in the city is blocked.”

Thick pine trees toppled almost in an east-west line near Montgomery Street, cutting off access to the lakefront. Police Chief Tom Buell said he expected some flooding in Old Mandeville, but by 4 p.m. officers had yet to carve a path through the debris to survey the Lakeshore Drive.



I hope Stu & his family are safe.

-Zeke
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 10:42

Quote:
At the end of the day, sadly, the question becomes "what does this mean to ME", unless someone you know was invovled.

It is disturbing how we react to such tragedys- it does not speak well of humans, nor of the United States.


This is largely true, but at the same time events like this can also bring out the best in people - all of the efforts, volunteers, donations, trying to help. (And this is coming from a cynical, pessimistic, anti-social hermit.) If there had not been a disaster, people in (select geographic location of your choice) would not be thinking about trying help someone living in poverty in NO or Biloxi. Catastrophic events amplify the emotions and tendancies that are already there. These can be both good (volunteering, donating, etc.) or bad (looting, profiteering, etc.).

I can only hope that this disaster can hold the attention of the media long enough to get the level of reaction from the rest of the country that will help these people rebuild.
Posted by: Micman2b

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 11:22

From the damage I have seen on TV and on the internet it seems like that the damage is worse than the 2004 tsunami. Would not suprise me to hear of 5000+ have died so far in this disaster. 100000+ in New Orleans alone are trapped and the populous will get ill from disease/fighting within the next few days and months. Where is the national outpouring like we had for the tsunamis. These people need help NOW!!!
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 11:28

Quote:
From the damage I have seen on TV and on the internet it seems like that the damage is worse than the 2004 tsunami. Would not suprise me to hear of 5000+ have died so far in this disaster. 100000+ in New Orleans alone are trapped and the populous will get ill from disease/fighting within the next few days and months. Where is the national outpouring like we had for the tsunamis. These people need help NOW!!!


In terms of material damage, buildings and the like, it's worse than the Indian Ocean tsunami. But 300,000+ lives were lost in the tsunami. Even though the death toll from Katrina will rise in the coming days and weeks, there's no way it will approach 300k.

As for donations, I am pretty sure the national outpouring is underway. Almost everyone I've talked to at work has donated to the ARC or someone else who can help. The story is still unfolding, and people are probably still trying to wrap their head around the situation.
Posted by: Micman2b

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 11:36

Quote:
Quote:
From the damage I have seen on TV and on the internet it seems like that the damage is worse than the 2004 tsunami. Would not suprise me to hear of 5000+ have died so far in this disaster. 100000+ in New Orleans alone are trapped and the populous will get ill from disease/fighting within the next few days and months. Where is the national outpouring like we had for the tsunamis. These people need help NOW!!!


In terms of material damage, buildings and the like, it's worse than the Indian Ocean tsunami. But 300,000+ lives were lost in the tsunami. Even though the death toll from Katrina will rise in the coming days and weeks, there's no way it will approach 300k.

As for donations, I am pretty sure the national outpouring is underway. Almost everyone I've talked to at work has donated to the ARC or someone else who can help. The story is still unfolding, and people are probably still trying to wrap their head around the situation.


Agreed Tony, whereas the deaths may never reach this magnitude, the damage is just as surreal. It seems that the national media is just coming to the realization of the scope of the destruction. Most folks really do not understand that this was not just another hurrricane with 30 deaths and a few trees down. A waitress last night told me that it is not a big deal and damage is minimal. We are talking about a 35-40' storm surge reaching 2-10 miles inland, winds to 170mph and devastating flooding in New Orleans.

If you can, donate to the ARC or your favorite charity...
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 14:48

I lived in New Orleans for several years. We always talked about the Doomsday scenario of a Cat 5 Hurricane picking up Lake Pontchartrain and dumping it in the French Quarter. It's very sad to see it coming true.

Regarding why people are out and about, its not so much "Must go out and look" but the desire to check on friends, family, or to survey the damage. The flood in Metarie in 95(?) was alot like this. Our friend's house flooded in the morning and in the afternoon, a group had assembled to help them clean up. It's just what we did because flooding was fairly common.

You also have to remember that everyone thought that they had dodged the bullet then the levee let loose. I'm guessing many people were caught off guard.

As far as how people died, most go out to survey the damage and get hit by debris or downed powerlines or walk into a canal or open manhole. In a car, you wouldn't believe the number of people that think they can get through high water. We watched one guy a few years back try to drive his car through an underpass where a bus was submerged in the other lane. Driving into canals that are flooded over is also very common.
Posted by: Attack

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 17:24

The price didn't go up yesterday but a co-worker just got back from lunch and Regular Unleaded is now over $3.00. He even said one gas station was putting the 3 up as he was driving by.

Another Co-worker talked to his dad today. His dad happens to work at an oil trading firm. His father said to make sure you fill up your tank every day since some areas could endup without any gas to buy.
Posted by: g_attrill

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 18:28

Quote:
Another Co-worker talked to his dad today. His dad happens to work at an oil trading firm. His father said to make sure you fill up your tank every day since some areas could endup without any gas to buy.

Hmmmm... that's what people did when we had the fuel blockades here in 2001. All it did was run the pumps drier sooner than it would otherwise had done because all the fuel was in the vehicles than at the station.

eg. my aunt, who drives very little had 1/4 of a tank left (enough for a week or two) but she brimmed it the first morning and probably still had 7/8ths of it left at the end of the week, when people who needed the fuel couldn't get to work.

Gareth
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 18:40

As of this morning we're up 32 cents/gallon and rising.
Posted by: Attack

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 19:07

Quote:
Hmmmm... that's what people did when we had the fuel blockades here in 2001. All it did was run the pumps drier sooner than it would otherwise had done because all the fuel was in the vehicles than at the station.

eg. my aunt, who drives very little had 1/4 of a tank left (enough for a week or two) but she brimmed it the first morning and probably still had 7/8ths of it left at the end of the week, when people who needed the fuel couldn't get to work.

Gareth



Well, just from memory about board members talking about how long it takes for them to drive to work. I figured 1/2 if not more have a 20 minute or more drive to work and a 20 minute drive home. Anyone that drives only 100 miles a week wouldn't need to fillup but those that drive 250+ a week might want to.
Posted by: tanstaafl.

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 19:19

As of this morning we're up 32 cents/gallon and rising.


I'm just wondering what justification the gas stations here in Alaska will use when they raise their prices 30 cents a gallon.... All of our gasoline is refined locally from oil pumped out of the ground in Alaska some 4000 miles away from the Gulf Coast.

They don't raise prices because their expenses have gone up... they raise prices because they can!

tanstaafl.
Posted by: Roger

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 19:48

Quote:
All of our gasoline is refined locally from oil pumped out of the ground in Alaska some 4000 miles away from the Gulf Coast.


But because the Gulf Coast isn't producing any oil, some of your oil will be sent there to meet demand. This'll raise the price of your oil, too. Brent Crude also went up in price, despite the North Sea also being about 4000 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico.

According to the BBC, the price of crude has dropped slightly, but local availability might have more effect on the price.
Posted by: JeffS

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 20:07

Our prices rose DRAMATICALLY today. I fueled up at 2.79 this morning anticipating the prices going up and I'm glad I did. On the way home premium gas was up to 3.39 (though the mid grade, which I use, was only up to 3.29). One gas station across the street from where I live didn't get the memo, obviously, and was still offering mid grade at a paltry 2.89. They had cars lined up like you wouldn't believe.

Apparently two fuel lines into Atlanta went down and everyone is panicking. I heard crazy rumors at work, including one that the city was going to prohibit gas sales during the weekend. Don't know where that idea came from. I've also heard (but haven't verified) that some stations have run out of gas.

I just read this article and really liked what the governor of GA had to say (though I don't know anything about him having just moved here):

Quote:
He acknowledged that while higher gas prices are an inconvenience, Georgians should keep in mind the massive humanitarian disaster in Lousiana and Mississipi where thousands of people may be dead.
Posted by: matthew_k

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 20:36

What I love is the Bush said nothing for the first two days, allowing doubt and fear about oil prices to spread throughout the entire US. Then, once the oil companies have had a chance to raise pricies, they announce they're going to release oil from the strategic oil reserve. This means the oil companies will have plenty of very expensive gas to sell us. So much could have been avoided by a simple statement ASAP that they'd release as much crude oil was necessary to maintain an adequate supply while it was able to without compromising Homeland Security.

Matthew
Posted by: g_attrill

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 20:44

I was expecting Bush to declare war against Mother Nature....

Anyway, to make you feel a tiny bit better here is one of my many recent petrol receipts...

edit: 90.9p/L = about $6.15 per gallon in US gallons

Gareth
Posted by: CrackersMcCheese

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 21:18

90? Pah I filled up at 93p today
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 21:25

It is important to note that it's a shorter route between Inverness and Dover than it is between Miami and Pensacola, and that's just Florida.
Posted by: Robotic

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 21:56

Quote:
What I love is the Bush said nothing for the first two days, allowing doubt and fear about oil prices to spread throughout the entire US. Then, once the oil companies have had a chance to raise pricies, they announce they're going to release oil from the strategic oil reserve. This means the oil companies will have plenty of very expensive gas to sell us. So much could have been avoided by a simple statement ASAP that they'd release as much crude oil was necessary to maintain an adequate supply while it was able to without compromising Homeland Security.

Matthew

Looks like he's serving his master well.
Load this into your RAM- Bush is a puppet manipulated by the oil industry.
Posted by: Gallagher419

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 23:10

What I'd like to know is is where is the International help at a time like this? The U.S. sends all kinds of aid to other parts of the world when disaster strikes yet I haven't heard one word of anyother country/nation offering any help! What gives?
Posted by: Ezekiel

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 23:26

Well, it has a lot to do with the US being the richest nation in the world... I don't give money to support Bill Gates' family either.
Posted by: phi144

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 31/08/2005 23:36

In my view, It's the thought that counts.
Posted by: Ezekiel

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 00:48

True, and a quick look at google news shows many articles from across the world reporting on the disaster (although no mention in Al Jazeera, strangely). I'm sure that other countries have offered their sympathies, it's just not news in comparison to coverage from the disaster areas.

-Zeke
Posted by: phi144

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 00:55

You're right. A lot of the coverage at this point is pointing fingers as to the poorly executed rescue effort. At this point I think it's better to get people safe, fed, and housed (in some way) and worry about what was done wrong later.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 02:20

Quote:
You're right. A lot of the coverage at this point is pointing fingers as to the poorly executed rescue effort. At this point I think it's better to get people safe, fed, and housed (in some way) and worry about what was done wrong later.


On the contrary, I think one of the media's most important functions is to point out to the readers, listeners, and viewers when crappy things are happening, to draw attention to them, and thus motivate the decision-makers to get off their duffs and do something about it. The media themselves can't help directly, except for lending a satellite phone here or a kiss and a hug there. So, if they're going to be there, they might as well call attention to the things that need attention.

For instance, tonight on CNN, the head of FEMA was being asked some tough questions about why the rescue/relief effort has been so slow in getting started. During the interview, he basically admitted that what was happening was unacceptable, and that they were going to need to speed things up, even if they take some more risks than they seemed to want to take.

The federal agencies have obviously been trying to hide behind the logic that they needed to plan things out first, make sure resources are distributed properly, etc., but it just doesn't wash. The people down there are in desperate need of food and water *NOW*, and it doesn't take much to throw some supplies on a plane and drop them down there. If we can scramble F-16s within two minutes if planes are heading for the White House, it's just not acceptable for this situation to go on for more than two days and not have more of a federal presence in the relief efforts.

Yes, I know this is a HUGE expanse of geography that's affected. Yes, I know that the storm's path changed, and that there were questions about how bad it was going to be, and that a lot of those in trouble now were people who didn't evacuate, or got caught at the last minute. But these are the things our government is supposed to plan for. Even if they didn't plan for it, it doesn't take much leadership from the top (and I mean the very top) to say "get some food and water on some big-ass planes and drop the s**t down there."

Katrina's aftermath has all the makings of a humanitarian crisis in our own country, and it didn't have to be this bad. WIth better leadership, we could have at least the beginnings of a handle on the situation now. I just hope that in a time when there's zero accountability in the federal branch, someone finally has to answer for their failure to do their job.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 02:22

Do you really expect a poor country in Africa who we'd offer aid to, or the Philippines for that matter, to offer the richest country in the world aid? It doesn't make sense. We give so much because we can and should. The rich give to the poor, and we are the rich. Who would you expect aid from, just out of curiosity?

That said, that question was asked many times on CNN today, and it was said that there were offers, including from France.

They are already asking the questions about what went wrong way too much on the news. I can't wait 'til this gets politicized... ugh. It's too soon to ask those questions, they are still rescuing people man. The focus shouldn't be on those questions YET.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 02:43

Quote:
The focus shouldn't be on those questions YET.


"The focus" is obviously on saving as many survivors as possible, evacuating the areas that need to be evacuated, controlling the public health crisis, etc. But, the media can do none of those things directly. The media, at least what I've been watching, has been doing a great job of showing images of Coast Guard rescues, doctors and nurses working at makeshift hospitals with almost no supplies, neighbors banding together to help each other out, and other things that are all newsworthy.

However, while they're covering those stories, they're starting to notice that, for as bad as this disaster is, a country with America's resources should not be in this much disarray in responding to it. As they include those angles in their reporting, the picture becomes clearer to the decision-makers that more serious steps need to be taken. If the media weren't there to report what's happening and ask the "why isn't this more organized?" type questions, then the situation might be even worse.

Believe me, I don't love the media by any stretch, but they're the only eyes and ears we have now, and the more they bark, the more is done to save lives. That works for me.
Posted by: drakino

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 04:16

Quote:
a country with America's resources should not be in this much disarray in responding to it.


Exactly. Especially to something where we knew 24 hours ahead of time that this is one of the worst hurricanes to hit the US ever. I guess people just expected it to magically disappear once it hit land, and do no damage. To have such a sloppy response when we knew it was coming just seems odd.

Even if it had somehow turned at the last minute and spared New Orleans the brunt of the storm, it was still very possible to foresee massive humanitarian needs somewhere along that coast line.
Posted by: frog51

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 06:57

93p, that's nothing - I've been filling up over 96p for a couple of months, and today, 99p a litre. Now, my car can get me 37mpg, but realistically, in order to make the most use of the fun PPP, I use WOT whenever accelerating, and that can bring mileage down to around 9mpg.

Plus, looks like the usage has killed my clutch. It has lasted 25 thousand miles longer than expected, but it's now slipping in 5th if I accelerate hard at motorway speeds.

</threadjack>
Posted by: andy

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 07:53

Quote:
93p, that's nothing - I've been filling up over 96p for a couple of months, and today, 99p a litre.


Pah !

I filled up with 99.9p a litre Optimax the other day...

Can a Scooby really manage 37mpg ? Mine typically does 27mpg with 80% motorway miles (or 20 with two mountain bikes on the roof).
Posted by: pca

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 09:16

Well, President Chavez of Venezuela has offered aid and fuel after the hurricane, which shows a certain amount of style.

pca
Posted by: phi144

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 10:41

I don't expect anything from anyone. Like I said it's the thought. I guess you may be reading more into this than needs to be. I fully understand your point, although an extreme one at that. No, I don't expect anything from African countries or any where else for that matter. The gesture would be nice. Maybe I'll phrase it this way, a show of concern.

You're right about us providing aid to others because we can/should. I'm not really saying "We do it for them, where's our share?"

Also, I agree with tonyc. Reporting the problem areas and what can be done now to help is a good thing, it needs to be done, but its already gone way beyond that. Not every news station, but some. I also agree that this should have been organized better, there is no excuse to the lack of supplies in the area and getting people out. Overall the media has done well at reporting success stories and communicating areas that need help “NOW”, however there are those stations that are already placing blame. I guess we should expect that unfortunately.
Posted by: phi144

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 10:43

"Style", I like that.
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 10:53

I can't seem to get this song out of my head.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 13:10

Quote:
(although no mention in Al Jazeera, strangely).


That could have a bit to do with the EVEN LARGER human disaster in the Arab world the other day. You know, the one that killed over a thousand people.

-ml
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 14:30

Actually, there have been offers from all over. The U.S. has been turning them all down. Just because you haven't heard it on the news doesn't mean it isn't happening.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 14:41

Quote:
Actually, there have been offers from all over. The U.S. has been turning them all down. Just because you haven't heard it on the news doesn't mean it isn't happening.


Here's one of the more frustrating examples of this situation.
Posted by: Ezekiel

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 14:42

Mark,
Agreed, but that little fact didn't fit into my editorial snipe very well and I didn't want to thread-jack with that horror and throw this thread into a 'which disaster is worse' argument.

However, the can is open, so I'll put in my $0.02 and have it done. Both events are horrific tragedies. I don't think there's anything meaningful to be gained by comparing/contrasting the two events. Time will tell the long term effects of both.

That said, I still think Al Jazeera's lack of any mention of the storm & its victims makes a better statement of how their editorial staff feels about the value of human life than anything I can say.

TonyC & Ninti-
Quote:

Quote:
Actually, there have been offers from all over. The U.S. has been turning them all down. Just because you haven't heard it on the news doesn't mean it isn't happening.



Here's one of the more frustrating examples of this situation.

Amen.
-Zeke
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 14:55

Quote:
although no mention in Al Jazeera, strangely

Well, they're only running AP feeds of it, but they do appear to have been covering the story since Monday. It's just that Google News don't seem to syndicate Al Jazeera.

Peter
Posted by: andym

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 15:43

The footage I've just watched about New Orleans on the news is unbelievable, they had a clip of a policeman who just lost it and burst into tears. What I've seen reminds me of Threads and that was about WW3. Bush seems to have really dropped a bollock on this one.
Posted by: phi144

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 15:55

Thanks for the link.

Unbelievable.
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 17:13

Quote:
Al Jazeera's lack of any mention of the storm & its victims

This is linked from the home page; there are four or five more links to earlier articles from 'related' box.

Edit: Ah, late again
Posted by: Ezekiel

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 17:15

I swear I posted this a minute ago...but it's not there:

Peter,
Thanks for the links. It's good to know. I spoke too quickly & I apologize.

-Zeke
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 17:19

Quote:
Actually, there have been offers from all over. The U.S. has been turning them all down. Just because you haven't heard it on the news doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Of course nobody is offering financial assistance. In situations like this governments and national organizations of Red Cross/Crescent/Exotic Animal routinely and without much ado offer S&R teams, mobile field hospitals, blood and plasma, tents, water purification kits, resources like that that might be stretched thin regardless of efforts to be prepared.

Edit: Actually, it turns out that many countries are offering financial assistance, too (including Sri Lanka's token $25000). France offered, among other things, 8 airplanes, 2 ships, hundreds of tents; Germany is ready to free up 2 millions barrels of their strategic oil reserves a day for a month... State department is yet to accept any of this.
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 17:27

Quote:
I can't wait 'til this gets politicized... ugh.

If this is not a matter of politics, I really don't know what is. (Ugh, I refrained, with utmost difficulty, from launching into one of my favourite political rants )

Quote:
there are those stations that are already placing blame

I think there's a lot of blame to be placed
Posted by: phi144

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 17:32

Quote:
I think there's a lot of blame to be placed


I can't disagree with that.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 17:52

Quote:
Quote:
Actually, there have been offers from all over. The U.S. has been turning them all down. Just because you haven't heard it on the news doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Here's one of the more frustrating examples of this situation.


I suppose Bush is probably afraid they'll smuggle in some beef jerky and bring Canadian lumber to erect shelters. Actually, on second thought, he's unlikely to have thought that far ahead. Skip it.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 18:14

They are asking very direct questions on CNN of Bush Sr. and Clinton, they have no answers. Wow, they are in fujll spin mode.

Don't forget though, that the city was actually missed by the storm, it was the breaking of the levee's that is causing the situation in New Orleans now. The mistake of not having those levee's able to withstand the overflow is a way bigger question. That said, the rest of the Gulf Coast is being completely ignored in the news coverage. There are inland small cities which are completely devastated and have no way to let people know they need help. Read some of the posts on the NOLA.com weblog:
http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/..._09.html#075810

Edit: I'm not one to defend this administration, but all the reports i've seen are that FEMA had stuff in place and was prepped for the situation the day the hurricane hit, but the ensuing disaster no one was prepared for.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 18:27

CNN is really hammering how f'ed up the response has been and asking good questions.... at least Cafferty is. "What role did race and class play in the Crisis"? I've been asking this myself.... and i say A LOT.
Posted by: Dignan

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 18:34

Quote:
They are asking very direct questions on CNN of Bush Sr. and Clinton, they have no answers. Wow, they are in fujll spin mode.

I'm just curious, but what do either of them have to do with the situation or the response to it?
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 18:38

Quote:
I'm just curious, but what do either of them have to do with the situation or the response to it?


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/katrina_washi...zkxBHNlYwN0bQ--
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 18:59

FEMA director Michael Brown has some good answers to the criticisms without spin or disregard.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 19:10

Quote:
FEMA director Michael Brown has some good answers to the criticisms without spin or disregard.

I'll have to hope his answers are replayed on Lou Dobbs or one of the later shows when I get home. When he was interviewed by Anderson Cooper the other night, he seemed overcome by the situation, stopping just short of admitting they've already made major mistakes in judgement. Not surprising, since he has no prior emergency management experience prior to taking his current post. Seems like that might be an issue during the interview process.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 19:28

Yeah. I'm trying to imagine that interview:

Quote:
Well, I've watched a lot of Irwin Allen films.
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 19:33

I don't understand this story ("School buses used to evacuate"), where Governor Blanco says they want to do the evacuation without disrupting schools. What's wrong with "School's out. All school-bus drivers in Louisiana: drive to your schools, get your kids home early, then get yo' ass the hell down to New Orleans. If you can get the kids home with fewer buses than you've got, get the rest of the buses the hell down to New Orleans now. People are dying down there"?

Hurricanes happen. Even levee breaches happen, at least with Category 4. But all this Mad Max Beyond Superdome shit should never, ever, have been allowed to happen. Where's the Dunkirk of little boats? Where is the United States Marine Corps?

Peter
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 19:35

Quote:
Where's the Dunkirk of little boats? Where is the United States Marine Corps?


At the gas station.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 19:46

Quote:
If this is not a matter of politics, I really don't know what is.


Oh, there are plenty of reasons why this is indeed a matter of politics:

http://www.markarkleiman.com/archives/mi...bal_warming.php
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001051313
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4200/is_20050606/ai_n14657367
http://abc26.trb.com/news/natguard08012005,0,4504131.story?coll=wgno-news-1
http://leftofyall.blogspot.com/2005/08/when-your-city-is-french-in-origin-and.html
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 19:55

Blanco is going to catch a lot of flack for this... and she knows it... you can see the guilt on her face. It's interesting that the FEMA guys keep saying they are there at the serivce of the state gov't and will do whatever they are told. As much as the Fed is to blame for the lack of timely response... It's looking like the state sov't is probably more responsible for not calling for the needed help earlier.

WOW... wow, they have a live caller from the convention center on cnn.
he's saying there's 3k people there, and there's no organization at all
5 or 6 police
not doing anything
mayor told them to go to the dome or to the convention center
and they've been there 3 days
with no one to tell them what to do or where to go
no help no food
wow. this guys report is unreal
[censored]
and they are putting him on live with the head of FEMA
holy hell
amazing
see... he's just saying that they are just now learning from the STATE about the convention center
That's amazing. That's the huge problem... the lack of communication. FEMA didn't even KNOW there were that many people in the convention center waiting for them! Don't they [censored] have CNN? Jesus.

Read the stuff I've posted on my weblog: http://www.underachievers.com. Stuff from my Dad who works at LSU. It's neither here nor there right now, but it's sad how scared the residents of Baton Rouge, my home town, are. My friends parents and my parents are seeing the demise of their city in a completely different way.
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 20:32

Great blog. I just wish the news could be better. For some strange reason, this photo made me feel a little better at least.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 20:37

It's crazy how rumors spread in situations like this. The news of violence or crime in BR from the displaced from NO is apparently rumors. The police department is saying it's not true. I don't doubt racism is playing a role in a lot of this. Ugh. Not pretty.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 21:26

Quote:
FEMA director Michael Brown has some good answers to the criticisms without spin


Counterpoint.
Posted by: SE_Sport_Driver

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 21:29

Quote:
Quote:
If this is not a matter of politics, I really don't know what is.


Oh, there are plenty of reasons why this is indeed a matter of politics:

http://www.markarkleiman.com/archives/mi...bal_warming.php
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001051313
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4200/is_20050606/ai_n14657367
http://abc26.trb.com/news/natguard08012005,0,4504131.story?coll=wgno-news-1
http://leftofyall.blogspot.com/2005/08/when-your-city-is-french-in-origin-and.html


You quote political blogs being political about this as justification for politics being inserted into this? Interesting.

Even the New York Times is sensible enough to note that global warming didn't cause this hurricane. To say otherwise is not only unprovable, it's unlikely. Using a tragedy like tthis as opportunity to further a political agenda is tasteless.

Back on topic, I'm utterly at a loss of words to describe how much I feel for the people who are still living through this and who have lost their lives. For days I was watching the news headlines leading upto this and at first it seemed that New Orleans was spared. I even began ignoring the story at that point thinking it was just another "close call". Saying those early accounts were wrong is an understatement.

The horror that is happening there is bordering on the surreal. Every headline is worse than the one before it and the situation is so bad it's hard for me to comprehend.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 21:41

Quote:
Quote:
FEMA director Michael Brown has some good answers to the criticisms without spin


Counterpoint.


Completely agreed. His attitude changed within a few interviews. After I saw him say that I was floored. What a [censored] crock. I hope he catches massive amounts of hell for that

I just watched Anderson Cooper on CNN rip Mary Landrieu (LA senator) a new one on national TV. Very impressive. I'll try and capture it from my TV in a bit and post it. I'm now on board with you guys... the questions need to be asked starting soon.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 21:48

Quote:

I just watched Anderson Cooper on CNN rip Mary Landrieu (LA senator) a new one on national TV. Very impressive. I'll try and capture it from my TV in a bit and post it. I'm now on board with you guys... the questions need to be asked starting soon.


Absolutely! For those who didn't see it, here's my favorite part, roughly transcribed:


Landrieu: "I want to thank Senators Frist and Reid for, I don't know if you've announced this yet, but Congress is in an unprecedented session to approve $10B in aid..."

Cooper: "Senator, I haven't heard that, because for the last four days I've been seeing dead bodies in the streets here in Mississippi, and to listen to politicians thanking each other and complimenting each other, uh, y'know, I gotta tell you here that there are a lot of people here who are very upset, and very angry, and very frustrated, and when they here politicians thanking one another, it kind of cuts them the wrong way right now."

pwn3d!
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 22:09

Quote:
te political blogs being political about this as justification for politics being inserted into this? Interesting.


But what if the mainstream media were also asking the same questions? Oh wait, they are. Even The Union Leader, not exactly a liberal rag, rips Bush apart over his response:

Bush and Katrina: A time for action, not aloofness

And, since we're quoting the Times...

Waiting for a Leader

In addition to the scathing criticism of our President's leadership, that Times piece does entertain the possibility that global warming is part of the increase in hurricane activity. I myself am not sold on global warming, nor am I a skeptic, but it's certainly worthy of continued investigation, and it's better to be safe (cut down on greenhouse gases, reduce emissions, etc.) than sorry, unless you own a business that would stand to lose money. In this case, high water temperature (along with insanely low pressure) was definitely a leading factor in Katrina not weakening as she headed towards the gulf coast.

Quote:
Using a tragedy like tthis as opportunity to further a political agenda is tasteless.


Was/is your response the same when the tragedy of September 11th was/is used for furthering other political agendas?

Quote:
The horror that is happening there is bordering on the surreal. Every headline is worse than the one before it and the situation is so bad it's hard for me to comprehend.


On this, we are in total agreement. The worst part? What we are seeing is just the beginning, in fact, the media is keeping some of the worst stories off the air. One can only imagine what those reporters, photographers, and producers are seeing that they *can't* show us. (Though I'd argue they should.)
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 22:46

Here's a link to a site that has quicktime footage of the Anderson Cooper interview I was talking about:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/01.html#a4740

edit: damn, link not working. I'll try and capture it from my tivo.

edit: working now.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 01/09/2005 23:51

Quote:
You quote political blogs being political about this as justification for politics being inserted into this?

Actually, the majority of those are news items, not political blogs. All raise points that the politics of Bush contributed to the fact that the situation is as bad as it is. I'd say that makes it political, wouldn't you.

Quote:
Even the New York Times is sensible enough to note that global warming didn't cause this hurricane. To say otherwise is not only unprovable, it's unlikely.

Hey, conservatives don't even believe global warming exists, remember? In any event, you are wrong, one of the major predicted effects of global warming is an increase in the intensity of storms, and recent studies are bearing that out. It is provable, and is likely.

Quote:
Using a tragedy like tthis as opportunity to further a political agenda is tasteless.

No, it's not. It's the perfect time to show that the policies of the administration are causing human suffering, while that suffering is fresh in your mind. Most are ignoring how our foreign policy has caused suffering in other countries for too long, maybe seeing suffering here in our country well finally hit home to some people how the U.S.'s myopic policies are helping to destabilze and destroy the world. Maybe, just maybe, it will sink in for some people now.
Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 01:45

A belated Katrina post. I find myself posting little more than occasional snippets lately because I don't have anything good to say about anything...or maybe there's just nothing *left* to say. So mostly I just hang out in my middle-class, hurricane-free existence.

Over the years the people at the National Hurricane Center (and other involved meteorological types) have taken a lot of grief for alarmist forecasts or hurricane forecasting that didn't pan out. I suspect that Katrina will be looked back upon as their finest hour. My cable still not disconnected, I will say I was a bit mesmerized by Kat as she marched on. (I've been in smaller hurricanes before and some of them were almost -- dare I say? -- fun. They are vivid memories in any event.). Anyhow, Katrina followed the predicted track as if on rails.

I was optimistic. The mayor, Nagin, seemed to have a pretty sober, practical grasp of the situation. Maybe he still does.

It is almost bizarre -- not funny but almost absurdly, sadly amusing -- to recall some sighs and pronouncements of relief as Katrina veered a bit to the east. "Hah! Missed me!" And it is amazing to have the tornadic lion's fury fade away only to watch the city killed by the aqueous equivalent of a subdued snake in the grass.

When a few officials started making comparisons to Hiroshima and the Christmas Tsunami, that made me a little unhappy. Will 100,000 or 300,000 people die? Not hardly. That being said, watching what has unfolded -- and I have been pretty glued to my despised network news -- means more to me in sad terms than the tsunami. My country.

Early on, with Katrina bearing down, I thought "Looks like this is going to hurt bad, but think of the resources we have to bring to bear."

If anybody has ever participated in disaster exercises, maybe you've had the same sense that I have of play acting and a certain degree of optimistic thinking -- "Hey, they told us we had to black tag two people but other than that it's a nice day for an exercise!"

I get the feeling that either agencies had a long bout of optimistic thinking or just maybe didn't follow engineering studies through to their worst-case conclusion.

I heard on TV that -- what? -- 20 percent or 25 percent of New Orleans residents live below the poverty line. I need to back up and compare that to other large cities. I mean, I guess I knew that. New Orleans always had an association to me with southern poverty, and my sense was that it wasn't the safest place to roam around, either.

OK, those planners *really* didn't follow a Katrina model to its logical, below-sea-level, conclusion. Like how do maybe 100,000 people without means get out of town?

In fairness, I am not always sure what to expect of some elements of our federal government, diminished and underfunded or not. How big is FEMA? How many full time staff would it take to *really* take on Katrina's aftermath aggressively? Are we willing to pay for another 50,000 FEMA staffers who hang out between disasters? Hey, maybe we could cross-train them with the TSA!

That being said, it sure looks like the preparation and response -- given what was known or should have been known from the engineering, meteorological, and social/political perspective -- has been *really* pathetic. All that comes now -- promises of more money and more troops -- doesn't seem like it will erase a lot of dark, negative pages of history.

I'm listening to a guy named McHale on CNN say "Over the next three days..." how many more troops will arrive. I see the assault ship Bataan has arrived with a few helicopters. Did they bring the amphibious tracks that would have been a great help on day two, or are those all in Iraq?

I remember so may public service ads for the National Guard over the years. images of weekend warriors filling sandbags, rescuing people. OK, we see some of that, but relative to the freight train that could be seen on doppler radar, somebody either dialed the phone too late or the people on the other end were out of town.

This would have been very, very bad in any event -- think of the thousands of people who are now homeless. Good grief, what are the thousands of people who escaped doing? Where are they sleeping? But so much more disheartening -- complete inability of the bureaucracy to even begin to offer some solace to most prominent concentrations of tragedy. The convention center, for example. I didn't see people there beating up or shooting reporters. I saw a bunch of overheated, tired, poor people screaming "Help!"

So now we are behind this curve. There are bad people in New Orleans. This being the USA, plenty of guns, too. So when McHale's promised troops arrive, it won't be to assert control, it will be to regain it. If I were a young black male with innocent intentions, I would keep my head down.
Posted by: SE_Sport_Driver

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 02:59

After reading Jim's post (thanks Jim) I again feel there is decency left to discuss this in human terms and leave politics out. I decided to remove my post and include it as an attachment instead. I probably should have just deleted it and let it go but then the last 30 or some minutes of typing would have been in vain.
Posted by: music

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 03:01

OK, I ranted extensively (off-board) early today about looting and so forth, and now I have mostly worked out a lot of my negativity.

So, I'd like to veer this thread a little back toward the more positive side for a little bit.

A lot of people have been showing compassion and trying to help in whatever way they can.

Amazon and Google have their donation links on the front page just like they did after the tsunami.

Houston has cleared the Astrodome schedule through December to take 20,000 people in there. San Antonio has volunteered to take on several thousand more refugees. Texas has agreed to provide school for the displaced children and is waiving its maximum class size laws for the duration.
Banks are letting people skip (or defer) payments in order to keep them out of bankruptcy.

Yes, it is a major disaster there. Yes, there is a tremendous amount of pain, suffering, chaos, and occasional displays of humanity's worst behavior. But there is also heroism, and sacrifice, and compassion.

I'm not going to let a few profiteering gas station owners in Atlanta, or a few gun-toting lowlife looters spoil my whole outlook on the world.

And I'm probably going to wait at least another week before I run around proclaiming that every problem in the entire universe from the hangnail on my little toe to the eventual death of our sun is the sole and exclusive fault of one little man who was recently vacationing on a ranch ringed by screaming protestors.

There's plenty of blame to go around, people.

I got to listen to 8 years of people blaming Clinton for their scratched CDs or their bulging waistlines or their fallen soufflés. Now, I get to listen to 8 years of people blaming Bush for their scoliosis, their poor flower-arranging skills, and the impending heat death of the universe.

.
Posted by: music

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 03:06

Hmmm, looks like our posts crossed in the night.
Interesting.
Posted by: Attack

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 10:36

I'm sure most of you here read /. but just incase you don't this guy is updating his blog from a datacenter in New Orleans. I happened to know about this before it his /. as this datacenter hosts the server for somethingawful.com and I like to read the TV/Anime/Car forums that they have.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 10:43

Check out this interview that WWL did with Mayor Nagin yesterday which is AMAZING:

MP3
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 11:12

Quote:
Check out this interview

OMFG. That is incredible.

Peter
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 11:46

Wow, that's a hell of an interview. "We should have a moritorium on press conferences." Indeed.
Posted by: CrackersMcCheese

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 11:54

Wooo - Nagin for President!
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 12:14

And all the more prescient when you read the NYT article on Bush heading down to tour the area.

Quote:
Mr. Bush will head first to Mobile, Ala., where he is expected to participate in a press briefing on the hurricane damage, according to his press schedule. Afterward, he will fly over Mobile to Biloxi, Miss., where he will participate in a walking tour of damaged neighborhoods.

The president will then view the Mississippi coastline by plane, en route to New Orleans, La., where he will land at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport. There, he is expected to issue a statement on the government's recovery efforts.


The NYT quotes Nagin from the same interview:

Quote:
"They were talking about getting public school bus drivers to come down here and bus people. I'm like you got to be kidding me - this is a national disaster," he said. "Get every doggone Greyhound bus line in the country and get them moving to New Orleans. That's them thinking small, man. This is a major, major, major deal. I can't emphasize that enough man, this is crazy."


The one thing that I don't get: there's a refrain of the feds not doing enough. There's nothing stopping the local officials from calling Greyhound.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 14:10

Quote:
In fairness, I am not always sure what to expect of some elements of our federal government, diminished and underfunded or not. How big is FEMA? How many full time staff would it take to *really* take on Katrina's aftermath aggressively? Are we willing to pay for another 50,000 FEMA staffers who hang out between disasters? Hey, maybe we could cross-train them with the TSA!


It's about priorities, Jim. FEMA has lost its cabinet-level status, and is now withering away and dying underneath the DHS umbrella. At a time when money for "Homeland Security"* is flowing like the very water that's caused so much anguish, it is scheduled to lose its disaster relief role entirely. And, despite the fact that a hurricane hitting New Orleans was #3 on FEMA's list of threats to our country (the #1 being their dead-on prediction of a terrorist attack on NY), funding for the SELA project to refurbish the levies has been consistently gutted.

Now, if anyone thinks this is Monday morning quarterbacking, and why weren't people up in arms about these issues before, the simple fact is our Government is there to be right about these things. I don't believe they're infallible, regardless of what side of the isle they're on. But the thing that absolutely infuriates me is when beaureaucrats ignore, dismiss, and in many cases cover up the things that their subordinates are uncovering because it doesn't fit their agenda. Do I believe that securing our cities, airports, seaports, etc. from terrorist attack needed to get more funding? Of course. But to totally put all of your eggs in the terrorism basket and ignore the "sh*t happens" principle is an absolute deriliction of the responsibility we entrust our leaders with.

Quote:

This would have been very, very bad in any event -- think of the thousands of people who are now homeless. Good grief, what are the thousands of people who escaped doing? Where are they sleeping? But so much more disheartening -- complete inability of the bureaucracy to even begin to offer some solace to most prominent concentrations of tragedy. The convention center, for example. I didn't see people there beating up or shooting reporters. I saw a bunch of overheated, tired, poor people screaming "Help!"



The scariest part about this is that, with a few exceptions, the response to this situation is a good indicator of our preparedness to respond to a terrorist attack. Suppose this were a suitcase nuke instead of a hurricane. The physical results may vary, but the net effect is dead people, refugees, and mass chaos. With the *staggering* amount of money that's been poured into these things, I would think that 4 years after 9/11 our response would be better, even if you grant them the flawed assertion that this was "unpredictable" and "unprecedented."
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 14:22

Quote:
Check out this interview

Partial transcript here -- but I really recommend listening to the whole thing.

Edit: And if CNN really think that's an "expletive-laced" interview, they need to get out more.

Peter
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 14:30

Quote:
I again feel there is decency left to discuss this in human terms and leave politics out


"Human terms" is exactly what makes the politics of this situation so important. After we all gasp at the horror of the situation, talk about how sad it is, make donations to the charity of our choice, and pray to our chosen deities for the safety and comfort of those affected, what's left to do?

If, by "politics," you mean partisan politics, I can assure you that I would immediately sing the praises of any Republican who showed the requisite leadership to address this crisis. And I've taken much delight in the media's lambasting of do-nothing Democrats like Mary Landrieu. In fact, the astute observer will remember that I've carried the water for this administration in the past when I thought they were right. I don't care what side of the aisle you're on, your job is to protect our nation from EVERY conceivable threat, not just ones that originate from Muslim extremists.

If this discussion has become too shrill for you to participate, I understand. But please refrain from impuning the "decency" of those who, after the initial shock of the situation has begun to wear off, decide that decisions our government makes or doesn't make are directly relevant to the Hell on Earth that we see on our TV sets.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 14:38

Quote:
Check out this interview that WWL did with Mayor Nagin yesterday which is AMAZING:

MP3


Bravo! You simply cannot fake the outrage and exasperation with which he speaks. He is directly reflecting the pain of the people he represents, and the helpless situation he finds himself in without any coordination at the federal level.

As to Dan's question about why he can't simply call up Greyhound.. Imagine if he and the mayors of Biloxi, Gulfport, and dozens of other little towns are all calling Greyhound asking for buses. That's already happened with the evacuation to the Astrodome. However, to get more, the feds have to get involved, because every other mayor and state rep is calling Greyhound up asking for those same buses. In a disaster that affects several states and hundreds of municipalities, you simply can't have every mayor and councilman taking what they can get their hands on. You need coordination, which is what FEMA's job is (or was.)
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 14:44

Quote:
Edit: And if CNN really think that's an "expletive-laced" interview, they need to get out more.


Pssst! This is America. We censor the cuss words out of "Saving Private Ryan" when it airs, even if we leave the violence in.
Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 14:58

Quote:
Quote:
In fairness, I am not always sure what to expect of some elements of our federal government, diminished and underfunded or not. ....


It's about priorities, Jim. FEMA has lost its cabinet-level status, and is now withering away and dying underneath the DHS umbrella. At a time when money for "Homeland Security"* is flowing like the very water that's caused so much anguish, it is scheduled to lose its disaster relief role entirely. And, despite the fact that a hurricane hitting New Orleans was #3 on FEMA's list of threats to our country (the #1 being their dead-on prediction of a terrorist attack on NY), funding for the SELA project to refurbish the levies has been consistently gutted.

Tony, I am your straight man.

I say "in fairness" because I always want to recognize (in my wishy-washy way) that allocation of these types of resources is a risk-benefit calculation and that there is always the possibility of an event occuring that will outstrip allocated resources and planning. I hate to say it, but...hurricane season isn't over.

Possible apologies to Brad here, but I agree with everything you say. And you can look to my sig to where I think all bucks stop. That doesn't mean blame for SELA can't be laid at the doorstep of previous administrations. Right now, though, somebody else has the ball.

My main point, though, was not to emphasize blame in my post but just to say that, whatever else you may think about SELA, global warming, or anything else, the response to Katrina given the phenomenally excellent meteorological intelligence, was woefully inadequate. This situation has become not just a tragedy but a disgrace.

Quote:
Now, if anyone thinks this is Monday morning quarterbacking, and why weren't people up in arms about these issues before, the simple fact is our Government is there to be right about these things. I don't believe they're infallible, regardless of what side of the isle they're on. But the thing that absolutely infuriates me is when beaureaucrats ignore, dismiss, and in many cases cover up the things that their subordinates are uncovering because it doesn't fit their agenda. Do I believe that securing our cities, airports, seaports, etc. from terrorist attack needed to get more funding? Of course. But to totally put all of your eggs in the terrorism basket and ignore the "sh*t happens" principle is an absolute deriliction of the responsibility we entrust our leaders with.

I think I am again your straight man again. I completely agree.

I will tell you one little problem I have:

I can't argue with various CNN reporters and others in electronic media raising the alarm and trying to help the rest of us understand how bad things are. But it strikes me how bold and righteous they are when Shrub's approval rating is, what 35%? Where were the bold reporters of CNN in 2002? I'm sorry, I'm glad they're doing what they're doing, but they still suck. This coming from somebody who probably would kick Shrub if I found him lying down.

Now Nagin I'll listen to.

Quote:

The scariest part about this is that, with a few exceptions, the response to this situation is a good indicator of our preparedness to respond to a terrorist attack. Suppose this were a suitcase nuke instead of a hurricane. The physical results may vary, but the net effect is dead people, refugees, and mass chaos. With the *staggering* amount of money that's been poured into these things, I would think that 4 years after 9/11 our response would be better, even if you grant them the flawed assertion that this was "unpredictable" and "unprecedented."


Homeland Security. When in doubt, reorganize. Makes it look we're accomplishing something.

Sigh. Coffee break's over. Gotta go back to work.

edit: and I *won't* grant them that assertion.
Posted by: pca

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 15:31

Quote:
Now Nagin I'll listen to.


Who's going do the first "Nagin for President" T-shirts?

pca
Posted by: Mataglap

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 16:03

One of the reasons that goverments and the current administration needs to pay attention to issues like this in advance is the mid- and long-range secondary and tertiary consequences of a natural disaster. What happened in New Orleans was not a surprise.

Here's a Washington Post article about some of the very real consquences of Katrina beyond the obvious.

Quote:
  • on coffee, which relies on the crippled port of New Orleans and its vast coffee warehouses
  • Import prices for steel and tropical fruit, much of which flowed through Louisiana's ports, are also likely to spike
  • oysters, four in 10 of which come from the waters off Louisiana
  • price spikes for asphalt, roofing materials, plastic pipe, insulation, metals and concrete
  • grain prices fell on word that harvests cannot be sent by barge down the Mississippi River for export
  • Delivery firms such as DHL, United Parcel Service and Federal Express informed customers yesterday they would add surcharges of between 5 and 15 percent
  • The premium that refiners charge to turn oil into jet fuel has shot from $3 a barrel at the beginning of the year to $25, pushing the effective price of a barrel of oil to around $95 for the already ailing airlines
  • Airlines and attendant businesses such as car rental companies employ 10 million, and account for 8 percent of the U.S economy
  • More than half the chemical industry's capacity to make alpha olefins -- a key ingredient in shampoo -- is in Louisiana
  • Nearly half of the ethylene glycol -- used to make polyester -- comes from the region
  • Roughly 12 billion pounds a year of ethylene capacity, about 20 percent of the nation's total, is shut down or operating at very reduced rates
  • Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Mich., said that with a key plant in St. Charles, La., still closed, the firm has now run out of propylene oxide, used in products from sportswear to detergents to engine coolants. The plant will remain shuttered for weeks



We live in a complicated interconnected world, and our goverment needs to understand it and behave in a way that acknowledges it. The current administration doesn't, isn't, and refuses to acknowledge facts. They are not "reality-based"*.

*Remember that gem from a quotation in an October 17 New York Times article by Ron Suskind quoting an unnamed aide to the (current) President.

Quote:
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 17:02

Quote:
CNN is really hammering how f'ed up the response has been and asking good questions.... at least Cafferty is. "What role did race and class play in the Crisis"? I've been asking this myself.... and i say A LOT.

Laura Bush has just been asked that (actually, what impression would world get seeng that virtually all of late evacuees are black) on CNN (from Cajundome in Lafayette). She more or less pretended not to understand. When pressed, she mumbled something about poorest people always taking hardest hit.

Edit: Dubya was next. All he said, grinning as usual, was that there are thousands of soldiers trained as military police coming to N.O. At least the general leading the Katrina joint task force sounded as if he knew his priorities.
Posted by: Gallagher419

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 18:03

I'm not surprised that this is turning into a racial issue! People should remember that New Orleans is around 67% black so yes most of the people stranded are black. Instead of crying about race why don't people ask why those who are stranded why they stayed? Everyone was warned well ahead of time to get out yet it seems that most people chose to ignore those warnings and we now have what we have down there. Don't get me wrong I don't like to see people suffer but if some officials are warning me to evacuate I'm evacuating. I just don't understand why so many did not heed the warnings.
Posted by: Mataglap

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 18:13

True, there are those who simply refused to go, but there are also a lot of people so poor that they simply couldn't afford to leave and don't have anywhere to go. Plus, if you remember, there was no way to physically get everyone out of town anyway.

Just because some official says something, it doesn't mean it's actually possible.
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 18:31

Quote:
Who's going do the first "Nagin for President" T-shirts?

Someone really should. You could have "Nagin for President" and his picture on the front, and "They're feeding the public a line of bull, and they're spinning, and people are dying down here" on the back.

One way or another, you see a lot of terrible things on television news over the years: in the former Yugoslavia, in Tiananmen, in Iraq. And I'm ashamed to say (though I guess it's only natural) that when they're in the news a part of me says "Well, that's the former Yugoslavia" (sorry Bonzi), "Well, that's Tiananmen", "Well, that's Iraq". But I've walked down Canal Street, along Riverwalk past the Convention Center, right through the backdrop of these events. I mean, I was only in New Orleans as a tourist for a week or so, but it's a great city and I've got great affection for it. And this week on those streets I've walked down, armed mobs have been shaking down hospitals for their food and water. And in that city people I'll have mingled with on Garden District streets, people I'll have been on the streetcar with, have this week been re-enacting the Black Hole of Calcutta, only with two hundred times as many people, and, this time, instigated by their own side. No first-world country treats their citizens like that. No third-world country treats their citizens like that. Heck, no third-world country treats their cattle like that.

You've got category 3 levees versus a category 4 hurricane. The levees were going to fail. And even if officials couldn't foresee, at the moment the levees failed, that widespread lawlessness might result from 100,000 poverty-stricken people with no food or water but a reasonable number of guns, it had already become pretty clear to any viewer of CNN by the end of Tuesday. Troops wanted deploying then, buses wanted lining up then (Houston's 350 miles away, you can organise the shelters while the buses are already moving), every rescue-capable helicopter in the continental United States wanted deploying then. Hundreds of squalid, awful deaths would have been averted.

I'm shocked and angered by the whole thing.

Peter
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 18:55

Quote:
Quote:
Check out this interview

OMFG. That is incredible.

Peter




Quote:
AP - Thu Sep 1, 4:15 PM ET
An aerial view of flooded school buses in a lot, Thursday, Sept. 1, 2005, in New Orleans, LA. The flood is a result of Hurricane Katrina that passed through the area last Monday.(AP Photo/Phil Coale)


link


Why didn't mayor Nagin deploy these buses when the mandatory evacuation was ordered?

All he's doing is complaining that no one else can think of a solution, yet he has none of his own. Of all people, the mayor of New Orleans should have been prepared for this day more than anyone else. It just sounds like he's ranting and raving, but has no plans or ideas... that's not great leadership. In fact, it sounds like he's completely out of the loop as far as rescuing his city goes.

Sorry, but the mayor sounds like the typical welfare recipients who voted him into office. He contributes nothing while he complains that someone else can't do enough for him.


PS - On a side note, I'm new to the riocar, and these forums look like the best source of info i've been able to find on the net. Thanks.

Billy
Posted by: g_attrill

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:00

Quote:
Check out this interview that WWL did with Mayor Nagin yesterday which is AMAZING:

MP3


That link is dead but here is another a working one (akamai so nice and fast).

Gareth
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:05

Quote:
I'm not surprised that this is turning into a racial issue!


Oh, I think it was anyway. I don't usually quote Jerry Springer, but he a good point when he said "If there were young, white women holed up in the Superdome, do you think they would be starving, thirsty and dying?"

Quote:
Instead of crying about race why don't people ask why those who are stranded why they stayed?


Ok, let's play a little game. Imagine you are poor. Not just low on money and can't make it to the ATM today, but actually dirt poor. You have a shitty minimum-wage job with which you have a hard time making ends meet from day-to-day, and are not always sure you will be able to afford a place to stay or to eat tomorrow. You have no car because cars cost a lot of money, no extra money to pay for a hotel someplace, no out-of-town family to stay with. I know it's hard to do, but imagine it.

Ok, now they order you to evacuate. You have 50 bucks in your pocket. What are you going to do? How are you going to get out? Where are you going to stay? What the hell are you going to do? Let's hear your options.

Hey, I didn't say it was a fun game.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:29

Quote:


Ok, let's play a little game. Imagine you are poor. Not just low on money and can't make it to the ATM today, but actually dirt poor. You have a [censored] minimum-wage job with which you have a hard time making ends meet from day-to-day, and are not always sure you will be able to afford a place to stay or to eat tomorrow. You have no car because cars cost a lot of money, no extra money to pay for a hotel someplace, no out-of-town family to stay with. I know it's hard to do, but imagine it.

Ok, now they order you to evacuate. You have 50 bucks in your pocket. What are you going to do? How are you going to get out? Where are you going to stay? What the hell are you going to do. Let's hear your options.


It's very tragic and they don't deserve to face such a disaster, but you must remember that you reap what you sow. Here's an article that sums it up very well in my opinion: tiadaily.com/php-bin/news/showArticle.php?id=1026

Some important points:
Quote:


There were many decent, innocent people trapped in New Orleans when the deluge hit--but they were trapped alongside large numbers of people from two groups: criminals--and wards of the welfare state, people selected, over decades, for their lack of initiative and self-induced helplessness. The welfare wards were a mass of sheep--on whom the incompetent administration of New Orleans unleashed a pack of wolves.


Quote:
What Hurricane Katrina exposed was the psychological consequences of the welfare state. What we consider "normal" behavior in an emergency is behavior that is normal for people who have values and take the responsibility to pursue and protect them. People with values respond to a disaster by fighting against it and doing whatever it takes to overcome the difficulties they face. They don't sit around and complain that the government hasn't taken care of them. They don't use the chaos of a disaster as an opportunity to prey on their fellow men.

But what about criminals and welfare parasites? Do they worry about saving their houses and property? They don't, because they don't own anything. Do they worry about what is going to happen to their businesses or how they are going to make a living? They never worried about those things before. Do they worry about crime and looting? But living off of stolen wealth is a way of life for them.


Maybe Springer should ask "if this happened in Idaho, would armed gangs be looting, murdering, raping, and attacking search and rescue teams?" Face it, this anarchy wouldn't happen in a 'red' county, and Orleans parish looks to be solidly 'blue': http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/LA/P/00/map.html

Billy
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:30

Quote:


Ok, let's play a little game. Imagine you are poor. Not just low on money and can't make it to the ATM today, but actually dirt poor. You have a shitty minimum-wage job with which you have a hard time making ends meet from day-to-day, and are not always sure you will be able to afford a place to stay or to eat tomorrow. You have no car because cars cost a lot of money, no extra money to pay for a hotel someplace, no out-of-town family to stay with. I know it's hard to do, but imagine it.

Ok, now they order you to evacuate. You have 50 bucks in your pocket. What are you going to do? How are you going to get out? Where are you going to stay? What the hell are you going to do? Let's hear your options.

Hey, I didn't say it was a fun game.


BTW, I'm just curious, do you believe in Darwinism or Creationism? Just curious.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:35

Quote:
if this happened in Idaho, would armed gangs be looting, murdering, raping, and attacking search and rescue teams?

Maybe you're not familiar with the Idaho militias who pretty much do this regardless of natural disasters.

Quote:
Face it, this anarchy wouldn't happen in a "red" county

This is absurd. I'm one (additional) troll away from banning your newly created account. Your name's not actually "Paul", is it?
Posted by: Daria

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:42

Is Paul Dutch?
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:46

Yeah, I saw that, but doesn't utwente have some sort of open access?
Posted by: Daria

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:47

Quote:
Yeah, I saw that, but doesn't utwente have some sort of open access?


Hm. Could be. I have no idea, actually.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:53

Quote:
Quote:
if this happened in Idaho, would armed gangs be looting, murdering, raping, and attacking search and rescue teams?

Maybe you're not familiar with the Idaho militias who pretty much do this regardless of natural disasters.

Quote:
Face it, this anarchy wouldn't happen in a "red" county

This is absurd. I'm one (additional) troll away from banning your newly created account. Your name's not actually "Paul", is it?


Hmm, I've never heard of this type of thing happening in Idaho. Perhaps they do have militias - I don't know - but I'm not aware of any disasters, riots, or eruptions of anarchy. Can you provide a link? I'm talking about a hypothetical situation to illustrate a point. When people own something that they've worked for, they usually don't destroy it further in a time of crisis. When people have nothing, they have nothing to lose and everything to gain, and a crisis only gives them that opportunity. My point about red and blue is that the 'have-nots' are usually very reliant on the state, which is a staple of the 'blue' side.

I don't know how are why you are assuming what my name is or that I'm a troll. I'm just another person with an opinion. Everyone has their own. If your opinion differs from mine, and if in your view that makes me a troll, then if you have the power to ban me from this site, then so be it. I suppose you don't like the free exchange of ideas, and if that is indeed the case, then I'm sorry I joined your site to offer my humble view of the situation. Everyone's view is different... you don't have to agree with them all...

Billy
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 20:56

Quote:
Is Paul Dutch?


Good question. There are many dutch Pauls here

But I'm afraid I'm not your guy.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:01

Quote:
Yeah, I saw that, but doesn't utwente have some sort of open access?


Cool, are you familiar with the university? We do have VPN's that are given to students, however you'd see that in the hostname, and all students here are given free internet access through the univeristy network, which is very nice. ;p

Many people here in Holland have taken a special interest in this disaster, due to some of our 'polders' being in similar predicaments as New Orleans.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:07

Okay. Let's assume you're being honest. First off, I think a comparison of guns in red areas versus guns in blue areas would be interesting. Second, despite the fact that NO may well be a very blue area, that still means that you have at least 25% conservatives there, and that's probably a very low estimate. Third, most of the po-ass folks I know are very conservative. They don't seem to follow that that's probably pretty hypocritical to stupid, but them's the facts. Fourth, the reason these people are poor is because they were born poor, not because they chose to become poor or stay poor. When you're in a hole, it's pretty hard to get yourself out of it. It's even harder when you've never seen above it.

Basically, your argument is spurious and offensive. Pretty much the definition of the characteristics of a troll. Odd how trolls always claim they don't know what trolls are.

That said, you do have points about why certain things weren't done by NO itself before the fact. But those arguments, while intellectually important, aren't really relevant now. No more than why NO was built in a hole in the first place. The only people that can help at this point are people from elsewhere, and they're just not getting the job done. It's better to prevent fires than to fight them, but just because they weren't prevented doesn't mean you should ignore them when they burn, even if your only reason is to prevent damage to the rest.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:10

Quote:
Hmm, I've never heard of this type of thing happening in Idaho. Perhaps they do have militias - I don't know - but I'm not aware of any disasters, riots, or eruptions of anarchy.

Google for "montana militia". Idaho is right next to Montana, and they have very similar groups there. Despite their stated stances, they're effectively anarchist organizations.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:23

Quote:
Okay. Let's assume you're being honest. First off, I think a comparison of guns in red areas versus guns in blue areas would be interesting. Second, despite the fact that NO may well be a very blue area, that still means that you have at least 25% conservatives there, and that's probably a very low estimate. Third, most of the po-ass folks I know are very conservative. They don't seem to follow that that's probably pretty hypocritical to stupid, but them's the facts. Fourth, the reason these people are poor is because they were born poor, not because they chose to become poor or stay poor. When you're in a hole, it's pretty hard to get yourself out of it. It's even harder when you've never seen above it.

Basically, your argument is spurious and offensive. Pretty much the definition of the characteristics of a troll. Odd how trolls always claim they don't know what trolls are.

That said, you do have points about why certain things weren't done by NO itself before the fact. But those arguments, while intellectually important, aren't really relevant now. No more than why NO was built in a hole in the first place. The only people that can help at this point are people from elsewhere, and they're just not getting the job done. It's better to prevent fires than to fight them, but just because they weren't prevented doesn't mean you should ignore them when they burn, even if your only reason is to prevent damage to the rest.


Good points, though putting aside the larger red and blue sides of this issue, my understanding is that a large majority of the guns that are being used by the gangs ruling the streets of N.O. were looted from gun stores?

I agree that it's useless to point fingers when there are still people to be rescued, but I only brought up how NO could have done more because others brought up how the federal government could have done more. I really don't see how this inevitable disaster can be blamed on the president when the problem has been known for decades. From my view here, it doesn't appear that the president doesn't WANT to help, but just that the logistics of this situation is a nightmare. One thing the president could do is allow the dutch teams of dyke technicians to provide their support. I can understand turning down cash from other nations, but turning down technical assistance from the world's best dyke engineers doesn't seem to be wise.
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:25

Quote:
Why didn't mayor Nagin deploy these buses when the mandatory evacuation was ordered?

Hm, he should better have good explanation for that...
Posted by: Daria

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:31

Quote:
One thing the president could do is allow the dutch teams of dyke technicians to provide their support. I can understand turning down cash from other nations, but turning down technical assistance from the world's best dyke engineers doesn't seem to be wise.


There's a really huge joke here, but I can't bring myself to make it.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:37

Holland is full of big dykes (sp?), and we have an intimate knowledge of their uses.
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:40

Quote:
What Hurricane Katrina exposed was the psychological consequences of the welfare state.

Total rubish! As you might know (you are Duch, right?), calling USA 'welfare state' compared to almost anything in Europe (or at least its richer part) is comical. And yet, our disaters (like floods we just had in Switzerland and Germany, or those really catastrophical two (three?) years ago) look remarkably different.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:43

Quote:
Quote:
What Hurricane Katrina exposed was the psychological consequences of the welfare state.

Total rubish! As you might know (you are Duch, right?), calling USA 'welfare state' compared to almost anything in Europe (or at least its richer part) is comical. And yet, our disaters (like floods we just had in Switzerland and Germany, or those really catastrophical two (three?) years ago) look remarkably different.


Very interesting point. i think the difference is that in the large american cities, there are 'haves' and 'have-nots', but here everyone is a 'have'. And in NO, the haves and have-nots are also seperated by race, but here they largely are not. And it's strange that those that are supported by the government here are 'haves', but the people on welfare there are still dirt poor? It seems that the entire black population has become dependant on the government in america?
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 21:58

Quote:
And it's strange that those that are supported by the government here are 'haves', but the people on welfare there are still dirt poor?

See? The solution is more of welfare state, not less...

Quote:
It seems that the entire black population has become dependant on the government in america?

Now, this is extremely unfair and dangerous sweeping generalization.
Posted by: Mataglap

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:05

Quote:
I really don't see how this inevitable disaster can be blamed on the president when the problem has been known for decades.


We could start with President Bush's policies and Administration directly refusing to fund the maintanence and support of the New Orleans Levee system. We could continue with the Administraion's direct involvement of reducing the scope and ability of FEMA to do anything. We could continue with the Administration's continued budget cutting against specific warnings about situations like this.

What this Administration has done instead is to reduce the federal revenue by cutting taxes for the wealthy, and spending huge amounts of the rest of the budget on a poorly cosidered military activity. There is no funding or ability for the parts of the goverment that should be able to deal with this situation, to deal with this situation.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:08

Quote:
My point about red and blue is that the 'have-nots' are usually very reliant on the state, which is a staple of the 'blue' side.


I hate to break it you, but the myth that the poor vote Democrat and the rich vote Republican is just that, a myth. The poorest (and least educated) states are primarily Republican. Here are some links for your perusal:

http://uspolitics.about.com/library/bl_education_vote.htm
http://www.reachm.com/amstreet/archives/2005/05/02/median-income-by-state/

I read an interesting book about this recently, "What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America". It is quite interesting how the American people have been completely hoodwinked into supporting politicians that hurt them and the nation.
Posted by: Mataglap

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:08

Quote:
One thing the president could do is allow the dutch teams of dyke technicians to provide their support. I can understand turning down cash from other nations, but turning down technical assistance from the world's best dyke engineers doesn't seem to be wise.


That's one of the few things you've said that I can agree with completely.
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:14

I'm just waiting for Godwin's Law to kick in. We're perilously close.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:29

Well, you're right that the problems can't be completely contributed to welfare. I'm starting to think that there are huge racial problems under the surface in the US that are one day going to erupt into a race war. Just look at who owns the businesses in NO and who is conducting the rescue efforts - mostly white. And look at who is living in and controlling NO - mostly black. I'm not racist, but it would appear that race is playing a role in this situation, one way or another, eventhough i think people are afraid to say it.

Billy
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:33

Quote:
being used by the gangs ruling the streets of N.O. were looted from gun stores?


Phfffft, not likely.

Last year, university researchers conducted an experiment in which police fired 700 blank rounds in a New Orleans neighborhood in a single afternoon. No one called to report the gunfire.

From the same article above:

The city’s murder rate is still far lower than a decade ago, when New Orleans was the country’s murder capital. But in recent years, the city’s homicide rate has climbed again to nearly 10 times the national average.

I have a friend in the construction business (correction: was in the construction business ). The first 3 months of each year he was booked solid patching roofs because the custom is to shoot guns in the air on New Year's Eve.

Quote:
One New Orleans "tradition" which has been getting unwanted attention is the shooting of guns into the air for midnight. Despite the fact that authorities have been cracking down hard on the offenders, it still remains a problem – 5 people were hit on New Year's Eve 2001. Even the mayor himself once said, "I would take cover at midnight myself, and I know that's not possible for everyone to do in the French Quarter because of the density of people there... There are risks to being outside. I cannot guarantee anyone's safety."


http://www.bootsnall.com/articles/01-12/big-easy-holidays-new-orleans-louisiana-usa.html
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:35

Quote:
Quote:
My point about red and blue is that the 'have-nots' are usually very reliant on the state, which is a staple of the 'blue' side.


I hate to break it you, but the myth that the poor vote Democrat and the rich vote Republican is just that, a myth. The poorest (and least educated) states are primarily Republican. Here are some links for your perusal:

http://uspolitics.about.com/library/bl_education_vote.htm
http://www.reachm.com/amstreet/archives/2005/05/02/median-income-by-state/

I read an interesting book about this recently, "What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America". It is quite interesting how the American people have been completely hoodwinked into supporting politicians that hurt them and the nation.


That could be so, however, from my experience, most large towns in the US have a rich side and a poor side. I was in the US during the last election and it seemed that the poor sides were democratic and the rich sides were republican, judging by the political signs I saw. Although that could have just been restricted to the region I was in (the southeast).

Billy
Posted by: Mataglap

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 22:38

Oh, here's something else to look at. The Administration out-sourced and privitized disaster preperation for New Orleans.

http://leninology.blogspot.com/2005/09/politics-of-weather-3-shyness-of.html
Posted by: SE_Sport_Driver

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 02/09/2005 23:31

Quote:
Possible apologies to Brad here, but I agree with everything you say. And you can look to my sig to where I think all bucks stop. That doesn't mean blame for SELA can't be laid at the doorstep of previous administrations. Right now, though, somebody else has the ball.


No need to appologize. I didn't send you a PM saying your post was a good read because I thought that for once you and I were in total agreement on an issue. I tipped my hat to you because your post was very tasteful despite the fact that I assumed if you had verged into the political mud slinging you and I would have come up on opposing sides. You saw this for what it is. A tragety. Not a political opportunity.

But I'll admit I'm done with this thread. I only skimmed the pages to see if you had a follow up and to see if there was anything specific to me that needed attention. I'm sure many of you have great points but my stomache is aching over this devistation enough already. I don't need empegBBS Crossfire to make it any worse.

So does anyone think there will ever be an Alpha 12? Why does my empeg still smell like burnt electronics?
Posted by: shadow45

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 00:14

We have them here too, but I couldn't tell you the first thing about how to use one. good luck.

(sorry couldn't resist)
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 03:26

Quote:
I only brought up how NO could have done more because others brought up how the federal government could have done more.

There's no doubt that everyone could have done more, but just about the only group that could do more now is the Federal Government. This is why FEMA exists, and they seem to simply not be doing their jobs. To continue my previous analogy, it's like you're trying to say that the fire department shouldn't be being yelled at for standing by while a building burns because no one's complaining that the people in the building shouldn't have had that bad electrical wiring to begin with.
Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 04:09

Quote:
Who's going do the first "Nagin for President" T-shirts?

I'm not sure that I think Nagin is presidential material -- 'course lately you could be a Madagascar ring-tailed lemur and get yourself elected if you opposed gay marriage -- but I do at least appreciate that he seemed to be at least *trying* to do the right thing.

Poor Nagin, in good faith he was probably trying to follow all of the disaster plans that they had worked through with the state of Louisiana and FEMA. The notion of pulling the most vulnerable into the Superdome seemed to make a lot of sense. Piece of cake. Once the hurricane has passed, then you just sit tight and wait for the airdrop of bottled water and C-rats...

...hmmmm, seems that was too complicated.

I was reading a few BBS today and I was depressed to see some ignorami opine on how the locals trapped in New Orleans deserved their distress because they ignored directives to flee.

What a bunch of complacent shits. Good god I hope that when the tsunami shit hits the fan here that we get a little more sympathy.

Earth to ignorami: Some very good, salt-of-the-earth people - people who you would do well to emulate and who you would be lucky to be compared to -- don't have bus fare to flee hurricanes. Some others are old. Some are infirm. Many work two jobs just to make ends meet. Oh, that doesn't work for you! Let's try this: women, nurses, not even poor -- I mean *white* women if that's what it takes to get your attention -- let the network news folks know that they have been abandoned by their government. What is your spin on *that*?
Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 04:29

Quote:
Here's a Washington Post article about some of the very real consquences of Katrina beyond the obvious.

That is an impressive list. We are probably just figuring this out.

Quote:
We live in a complicated interconnected world, and our goverment needs to understand it and behave in a way that acknowledges it. The current administration doesn't, isn't, and refuses to acknowledge facts. They are not "reality-based"

Not to be *too* much of a snob, but this has been pretty obvious to some of us for a while. 'Course those folks who voted for Shrub call us effete elitists. Oh, I don't know. Do they call us that? They don't like us. I know they call us something!

Quote:
*Remember that gem from a quotation in an October 17 New York Times article by Ron Suskind quoting an unnamed aide to the (current) President.

Sadly, I remember this quote very,very well. But some proportion of voting-age Americans -- perhaps a majority! -- saw fit to vote for the ticket of the neocon empiric reality molders.

More sadly, I am concerned that these ignorami have won. Hurricanes or no, the DNC offers no real alternative. I think that I am going to gather up all my powdered milk, all of my beef jerky, all of my AA batteries, and all of my 9mm cartridges and just tip-toe up to the attic.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 05:59

I don't see why some people always try to villify those in power in situations like this. I might not like some things Bush does, but I can't see how he is responsible for this natural disaster. You should cut the man some slack, he is your president. You say it appears he's doing nothing, but he's probably just away from the cameras, getting down to business, where as the mayor of New Orleans has time to do interviews to rant about the Iraq war, which is just useless in a crisis like this. I don't think there's anyone who doesn't want to rescue the survivors, it's just a huge undertaking. A huge city is underwater, in a devasted region, supplies are short (even for the rescuers), and to make matters worse armed gangs are shooting at police, helicopters, and boats.

Here's a flashback to a news article from 28 August:
http://www.nola.com/newsflash/louisiana/...ylist=louisiana

Quote:
The mayor called the order unprecedented and said anyone who could leave the city should. He exempted hotels from the evacuation order because airlines had already cancelled all flights.


Quote:
Gov. Kathleen Blanco, standing beside the mayor at a news conference, said President Bush called and personally appealed for a mandatory evacuation for the low-lying city, which is prone to flooding.


I think some people just don't like George Bush, and anything bad that happens in the world gives them an opportunity to somehow lay the blame on him.

Billy
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 06:05

Here's streaming audio of the louisiana police and national guard radio traffic. http://ev1helps.net:8080/lspbtr

I've been listening to that for the last couple of days, and so far i think it's the best source of information, though it takes a bit of patience
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 07:07

Quote:
Here's streaming audio of the louisiana police and national guard radio traffic. http://ev1helps.net:8080/lspbtr

Some friends were listening to it, and said they had heard (among many other grim things) the direct reports of bad goings-on in the superdome. For instance, they heard the police calls that someone had been shot, the night before the Mayor was shown on television saying that there had been no shootings in the superdome and that it was a false rumor.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 12:56

The US had a faster response to the Christmas Tsunami halfway around the world than they're having to this, within its own borders. We have an organization explicitly dedicated to disaster management and they seem to not know what to do. We've been curtailing our civil liberties over the last four years so that the government might have a better response to disaster, and it seems that, at best, we are no more prepared to cope now than we were then. The time will come for people to point fingers at Nagin for not mobilizing those schoolbuses, at New Orleans and Louisiana for not having better levees, at those stupid enough not to leave who had the opportunity and means, but for now, we've got to complain that the people who have the power to fix these things, or at least help, are not doing enough.

Quote:
[Bush is] probably just away from the cameras

Nope. That's one of my problems. He felt the need to go down there to have a photo opportunity. But he didn't even bother to go to New Orleans. I'm sure that it's too devastated for his swagger to make it all feel good.

Now he's saying "The results are not acceptable," only to qualify that later with "I'm satisfied with the response, I'm not satisfied with all the results." And he says this like he's not the person in charge of getting this done. People in the US, and probably moreso in the rest of the world, don't seem to understand that it's not the President's job to make laws or pass a budget or declare war. It is explicitly his job to run the country, to deal with the actual events that make the country work. This is the most presidential duty there is, to protect and save his citizens, and he seems like he's busy not doing it. I suppose he did have to cut his vacation short.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 16:51

Argh. Just watching CNN and some FEMA official just said that the problem is not that there's not enough National Guardsmen, but that it takes time to deploy them, and I quote "we don't get them ready in 24 hours, unless, you know, it's some big emergency".

Apparently they still don't think that it's a big emergency.
Posted by: Laura

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 17:25

I haven't seen anyone post this link yet, but for those of you that are able to house some of the displaced victims, go to www.hurricanehousing.org and you can post how many people you can house, if they can bring animals and other questions. I know I live far from the south, but I posted that I could take in a couple of people. I'm sure there are others on the board that can do this. It's one way to help out.
Posted by: genixia

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 18:30

Quote:
I don't see why some people always try to villify those in power in situations like this. I might not like some things Bush does, but I can't see how he is responsible for this natural disaster. You should cut the man some slack, he is your president. You say it appears he's doing nothing, but he's probably just away from the cameras, getting down to business, where as the mayor of New Orleans has time to do interviews to rant about the Iraq war, which is just useless in a crisis like this. I don't think there's anyone who doesn't want to rescue the survivors, it's just a huge undertaking. A huge city is underwater, in a devasted region, supplies are short (even for the rescuers), and to make matters worse armed gangs are shooting at police, helicopters, and boats.
...

Billy


Well...

1) It took him two days to decide to end his vacation and do anything.

2) There'd be 8000 more Louisana and Mississippi National Guards if they weren't off in Eye-Raq fighting that war over WMD, oops, I meant Freedom. Oops. Terrorism. Oops, keeping the oil from Al Quaeda. Or whatever the excuse will be tomorrow.

3) He cut funding from the Army Corps of Engineers knowing that it would impact plans to strengthen the N.O. levees.

4) He cut FEMAs authority, budget and capability.

That's a pretty damning indictment right there. And then let's look at what he's said since Katrina;

1) He called for "Zero Tolerance" for lawlessness, including looting. He could have called for restraint. He could have called out specific crimes that we all agree shouldn't be happening - violence, gun crime, theft of non-essentials and valuables. He didn't - he told tens of thousands of people entering a scorching day 3 without water, food, shelter, medicines or means of escape, that they weren't allowed to provide for themselves.

2) He claimed that noone had predicted the breaching of the levees. Obviously he wasn't watching CNN or the Weather Channel last Saturday then because that concern was certainly raised then. Obviously he didn't listen to the Army Corps of Engineers when they were previously discussing strengthing the levees. If he had he would have known that they were only designed for category 3 hurricanes. Obviously he didn't get the memo in mid 2001 that spelled out the 3 worst disaster scenarios for the US. (It must have gotten lost along with the memo about known terrorists learning to fly planes and wanting to hijack planes in the US). Come on, cut me a break here. Do you really believe that after the Tsuami that no one briefed the President about potential storm surge risks?

3) “It’s devastating,” POTUS said as he watched, according to Scott McClellan. “It’s got to be doubly devastating on the ground.” Doubly?! I would think that sitting on your rooftop for 3 days without food or water, knowing that everything that you owned is gone, is a little more that 'doubly' devastating that seeing the destruction from the luxury of your private 747 during a 30 minute flyby.


Frankly, this president is completely ineffective. He's zero for three. Osama, Iraq, Katrina. IMO, the only reason that he hasn't been, and won't be, impeached is because nobody wants Cheney either.
Posted by: canuckInOR

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 21:01

Quote:
I might not like some things Bush does, but I can't see how he is responsible for this natural disaster.

That's right, Bush is not responsible for the natural disaster. He is however, responsible for making sure that the country is adequately prepared for a natural disaster, not to mention allocating funds and developing programs to mitigate the disastrousness of any potential disaster before it strikes. Contingency plans. Heard of 'em? Good leaders are supposed to have them.

Quote:
You should cut the man some slack, he is your president.

[censored], this country has done nothing but cut him slack since he swore the oath and took office... as Governor of Texas. It's about time that the country stop cutting him slack, and start pointing out what a miserable failure the man really is, and has been.

What kind of president continues his vacation another two days before surveying the damage from one of the most powerful storms to ever hit the US, and meeting the affected people to offer some words of support?

And it took another day or two to pledge any support at all. This is a guy that has a big plane fly him around at a moments notice. They knew this storm was the biggest storm to hit the US in years. They predicted it was a cat 5 storm. Why the hell wasn't he on standby? It's not like this storm was some sort of surprise -- they tracked the damn thing across the Gulf. Where was he? This is his job, and he sure as hell wasn't doing it.

[censored] that.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 03/09/2005 21:50

I'm not a violent person, but if I hear one more person say it's the fault of those who didn't get out that they have been neglected and starving for 4-5 DAYS after this disaster, I'm going to punch them in the fucking face. How arrogant can you possibly be? How lacking in any sort of empathy can you possibly be? How can you look at video of a mother holding a child that is dying of dehydration and tell her to her face she deserved it??! And on top of that that it's her fault she's poor?!

It's the governments responsibility to protect the life and health of it's citizens. If you take that attitude and take it to it's end then you'd advocate that we leave the elderly to die... that we leave those who have ZERO dollars in their pocket to die. But I guess they could have walked to Baton Rouge eh? Or maybe wheeled themselves? If you want to ask the question of why transportation wasn't provided to those in need, hey I'm all for it, but don't take such a pompous out of touch stance in front of me.

I have family who've lost everything they own. They've lost their CITY. And they are amongst the lucky ones. They had a CAR and MONEY and FAMILY to get out.

(not directed at canuckInLA)

edit:
read this: diary of EMT in NOLA
and this: quick breakdown from someone who DECIDED to stay.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 00:13

Just talked to my Mom... my cousin who is NOPD finally checked in, said he had to shoot someone who drew a gun on him today. They are giving him a 3 DAY leave. A lot of cops are just walking away, quitting. Two of his sergeants COMMITTED SUICIDE because they couldn't deal with it. The first hand reports of rapes and murders and child molestations are only beginning to break the surface. Tens of thousands of people have witnessed things that most soldiers never see. How are they going to mentally deal with this? It's just never ending. I'm so angry and helpless. Going to be looking for flights home tomorrow.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 00:32

Quote:

I think some people just don't like George Bush, and anything bad that happens in the world gives them an opportunity to somehow lay the blame on him.

Billy


If you don't think he is partially to blame, go look up his job definition. Commander in Chief last I looked. You see... that's the way the entire structure works... the guy at the top is responsible for everyone below him. I don't care if Kerry was in there, if this is what happened, he'd be responsible. This isn't a retarded Democrat v. Republican bunch of tripe, everyone in power holds responsibility. You can spin it however you want. It doesn't change direct factual involvement in policy decisions that led to the multiple horrible outcomes.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 06:27

One part of the culture of New Orleans was crime, murder, and the life of a thug. The vast majority (not all) of the people who stayed behind were the welfare and criminal class whose role models were Tupac, C-Murder, and other thugs.

When a white person can't walk down the streets of a black neighborhood without fear of being shot, it's no surprise that no one is shedding a tear for them. It's a disgrace that the NG and police have to be armed with M-16's to rescue these people. They came to help, not to fight a war.

This isn't racism. It's the hard truth. If you want to see racism, drive to the blackest and poorest Detroit neighborhood you can find, and ask them what they think of white people. I'll be surprised if you come out alive.

Politicians and officials should be blamed for late action or inadequate planning, but you can't blame them for the anarchy in NO that has hampered the rescue. You can't help people who refuse to help themselves.
Posted by: mcomb

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 07:41

Quote:
You can't help people who refuse to help themselves.

Dude, please learn to show some empathy or find another board to express your views. Thousands of people are dieing here. It doesn't matter if they were warned, had a chance to get out, where told to leave, whatever. The time for that is passed and now it is time to do what we can to take care of those who didn't leave, regardless of their reasons and regardless of your political slant. We are talking about people stuck in a hellish situation that many of us can't really imagine and have no idea how we would cope with. This is not the time to chastise them for being poor or black.

There is politics that can and should be discussed in regards to this situation, but please don't blame the people trapped in this catastrophe for it.

-Mike
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 08:08

Quote:
the welfare and criminal class

Here we go again: jobless = criminal

Quote:
blackest and poorest Detroit neighborhood

Of course, Blacks are poor by choice, right? Their ancestors also came to America by choice.

BTW, when showing us web sources explaining the true roots of this, you forgot to mention that all this mess is doing of DNC, ACLU and UN!

Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 08:31

Ugh, Loren, I realy do hope your folks will emerge from this in one piece, physically and phycologically.

Again, this is totally surreal!
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 08:37

Quote:


BTW, when showing us web sources explaining the true roots of this, you forgot to mention that all this mess is doing of DNC, ACLU and UN!




I thought it was the doing of Bush?
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 11:06

Greetings.

Agreed. I hope that Loren's family, Stu's family, Lectric's, and everyone else are able to come out of this as well as can be expected.

If there is anything that can be done to help out, post the request on the board. If we can help to send people to Amersfoort or arrange international curry deliveries, I am sure we can help out on a more personal level than just the ARC or America's Second Harvest (my charity of choice).

As for the politicians and the political debates, discussions of responsibility, accusations of racism or of economic discrimiation, who to blame, etc. - I am sure there will be plenty of time after everyone is safe and people's lives are stabilized to congratulate each other, provide spin, debate "should have / would have / could have" and point fingers. For now, politicians who whould be directly involved should get to [censored] work! If the politicians are not directly involved, then get out of the way and let those who should be working do their jobs! The debate right now is a distraction and a delay to those who need help now.

Sorry. I have heard a few too many debates on this in the news lately. I prefer to think, perhaps incorrectly, that it was a combination of the severity of the disaster combined with the chaos of the sitation and destruction of communication, roads and infrastructure compounded by mistakes or miscommunications on the part of local, city, county, state, federal and executive governments and agencies that have probably not slept a night since before the storm hit that made a lot of this worst than it should have been than some dastardly plot to deliberately withhold aid in a bit to secretly perform ethnic, political or economic cleansing on a targeted population.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 12:09

Hey guys, I'm alive. I actually live in Kenner, outside of NO. I am CURRENTLY living in my office as my house is still flooded. Working as part of the government through this lends a different perspective of what's going on. For the record, then National Guard WAS deployed before the storm hit. I have become friends with our contingent here as is bound to happen to people when they are living under these conditions. Unfortunately, the NG was intended to be here on a humanitarian effort only. They were not planning on needing ANYTHING like they need now. Despite what is being reported, I have seen massive federal aid coming in. For a long while it was more than our airport could handle. Our government is not holding out on us, it as just caught ith its pants down.
Also, communications here are a complete nightmare. We cannot make phone calls out from here. We can only recieve some phone calls. This will vastly slow response time.
One thing I am grateful for is that I have no access to TV. I don't think I could handle atching hat is going on. 2 police officers here commited suicide last night as a result of the stress. I know of 5 other people personally who did the same because they couldn't take it.
Yesterday I was assigned to escort our media person to the media trucks. I had to see first hand the destruction in Orleans Parish. The pictures you are seeing are still likely current. As of last night, the water is still past the rooflines of all the homes I saw. I also had to go to the airport. I can't describe the suffering I've seen. Ya'll, please, we need your support. Forget about placing blame for now, please. We need your efforts to be used in a better manner. Understand, we have FEMA and police and firefighters being fired upon while they're trying to help save people. I just recieved word that the police chief of NO committed suicide. Still a rumor at this point, but unfortunately a believeable one.

As to the numbers of people dying, the initial estimates are ranging from 15-20 thousand, but that number will surely rise as more people are found trapped in their attics and drowned and further still from the disease that is sure to come.

I'm trying but words fail to describe what horror I'm being witness to. My access is very spotty, but I'll try and give updates when I can.
Posted by: JeffS

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 12:15

Quote:
Hey guys, I'm alive.
Thanks for the update. I've been worried about you since your last post. It's good to know you're alive and holding up, and thanks for the update about how things are going on the ground. Of all the noise being thrown about the internet and telivision, yours is a voice I know I can trust. My wife and I will continue to pray for you.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 12:20

As to showing empathy for the people trapped here, it's getting harder for me to do for a certain element. There are thousands upon thousands who cannot afford to evacuate. There are also thousands who stayed because we've been through this a thousand times, and it's never been like this. Finally, there are thousands who chose to stay to take advantage of the city's vulnerability. I wouldn't mind terribly if the last group was rounded and marched into the ocean. They are the ones responsible the evacuation tragedy that is happening now. There are still FAAAAR more honest people trapped here than criminals, unfortunately, it just takes a few criminals to cause they pullout of relief crews.
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 13:10

It is good to hear you are okay for now. Hang in there!

Edit: Looking at the map / pin system from the other thread, Kenner looks like it escaped most if not all of the flooding, but has a bit of wind damage.

Edit 2: Wow. Knowing Lectric's name from his public BBS user information, I was able to internet search, got a possible address, found out where it was on Google Maps and cross referenced it with the Katrina Map. The good news is that there does not look like there was any flooding in this area, except for isolated reports (less than one inch, already gone) the next street over. There were a few people asking for information, but the reports seemed to show all was mostly dry. The bad news is that this is really, really scary from a Big Brother paranoia front...
Posted by: Laura

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 13:22

Let us know how we can help the most.
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 13:46

I am personally thinking in two waves at the moment: first, right now with the major charities (ARC, ASH, etc.); second, when folks have a chance to return to their homes (or what is left of them) and helping more local charities - churches, hospitals, libraries, individuals, etc.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 19:43

Quote:
One part of the culture of New Orleans was crime, murder, and the life of a thug. The vast majority (not all) of the people who stayed behind were the welfare and criminal class whose role models were Tupac, C-Murder, and other thugs.


You, sir, are an ignorant, racist, cold-hearted, callous, evil, soulless shell of a man. I wish that I believed that true Karma really existed so you would find yourself in these people's shoes one day.


lectric, I'm glad your OK man. Stay safe and sane, I'm sorry you have to be there for this.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 19:51

Hey, cool it guys. Billy was mostly just stating what public officials and other people on the spot are saying.

There's some real scum with guns and drugs in NO, and it would be very tempting to just leave them there until they starved to death.

Except there is/were a lot of innocent people-of-no-means there too.

Cheers
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 04/09/2005 23:28

That actually was cool, you don't want to see what I wrote and erased before writing that. The guy is scum, and he should take his racist ignorant mean-spirited trolling somewhere else. I know there is an unwritten rule to be nice around here, but come on, this guy doesn't deserve any of that.
Posted by: gbeer

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 00:51

Quote:
It is good to hear you are okay for now. Hang in there!

Edit: Looking at the map / pin system from the other thread, Kenner looks like it escaped most if not all of the flooding, but has a bit of wind damage.

Edit 2: Wow. Knowing Lectric's name from his public BBS user information, I was able to internet search, got a possible address, found out where it was on Google Maps and cross referenced it with the Katrina Map. The good news is that there does not look like there was any flooding in this area, except for isolated reports (less than one inch, already gone) the next street over. There were a few people asking for information, but the reports seemed to show all was mostly dry. The bad news is that this is really, really scary from a Big Brother paranoia front...

It looks like the pin map is gone now.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 01:24

Works for me.
Posted by: gbeer

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 01:44

http://www.scipionus.com/ right?

All I get is a note from the web host saying that there is no website configured at the address. Cleared the cache. Same same.

Edit: 11PM; Ok now must have been a temporary thing.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 02:30

Wow, I'll be passing that info out NOW.. Very cool web site. Unfortunately, although you likely were looking at my house, I do, in fact, have 2" of water currently standing in it. But after visiting N.O. proper, I could really give a schit. I'll replace the missing parts of my home. Many many people have no home to rebuild anymore, and if they do, it's likely so contaminated by the toxic sludge it will never be inhabitable again, they will have to start from scratch.

As to what Billie was saying, he is, unfortunately, right. It is a simple fact that when I was at the airport, working my way through a festering mass of people, I was able to walk pretty much anywhere I wanted because of one fact. I was white. I, too, haven't showered in 6 days, hair dissheveled, was wearing a nasty old t-shirt. I COULD go wherever I want since I have a badge from the mayor's office, but I was never required to show it. Call it profiling if you like, but understand, our cops are over 50% black in New Orleans. Hard to accuse them of racism, just that they know reality. That is absolutely not to say that all blacks are criminal, far from it. Or that no whites are. I know better. But the ratio here is undeniable. (By the way, our mayor is black and he is constantly talking about the problem of black on black crime as one of the major problems here).

One bit of good news. The National Guard is here in full force, and looting has been all but stopped. They have now started opening fire on looters and have killed at least fifteen today. This is a good thing as the looters are the ones preventing emergency workers from doing their jobs. So, the less looters there are, the more lives can be saved.
Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 02:54

Quote:
Hey guys, I'm alive. I actually live in Kenner, outside of NO. I am CURRENTLY living in my office as my house is still flooded. Working as part of the government through this lends a different perspective of what's going on.

Hey, lectric, you Louisiana Republican! It is very excellent to read your post here. And I mean that. There is so much 2nd and 3rd hand information.
Quote:
For the record, then National Guard WAS deployed before the storm hit. I have become friends with our contingent here as is bound to happen to people when they are living under these conditions. Unfortunately, the NG was intended to be here on a humanitarian effort only. They were not planning on needing ANYTHING like they need now. Despite what is being reported, I have seen massive federal aid coming in. For a long while it was more than our airport could handle. Our government is not holding out on us, it as just caught ith its pants down.

What I have to say comes from an unaffected citizen sitting high and dry in the Northwest, so you can keep your grain of salt handy.....

I have nothing but thanks for the members of the NG who are trying to do what they can. I do have issues with the "pants down" problem, though. DHS' Chertoff said something like "Katrina broke the mold...blah, blah, blah" but I think that is complete BS. DHS and their diminished stepchild FEMA ran sand table exercises and from what I can tell (and I wait to be contradicted) the parties simply were not interested in following the scenarios through to their worst conclusions. Mad Max anarchy conclusions. That is too bad.

Quote:
Also, communications here are a complete nightmare. We cannot make phone calls out from here. We can only recieve some phone calls. This will vastly slow response time.
One thing I am grateful for is that I have no access to TV. I don't think I could handle atching hat is going on. 2 police officers here commited suicide last night as a result of the stress. I know of 5 other people personally who did the same because they couldn't take it.


This is really, really bad. I don't know what else to say.
Quote:

Yesterday I was assigned to escort our media person to the media trucks. I had to see first hand the destruction in Orleans Parish. The pictures you are seeing are still likely current. As of last night, the water is still past the rooflines of all the homes I saw. I also had to go to the airport. I can't describe the suffering I've seen. Ya'll, please, we need your support. Forget about placing blame for now, please. We need your efforts to be used in a better manner. Understand, we have FEMA and police and firefighters being fired upon while they're trying to help save people. I just recieved word that the police chief of NO committed suicide. Still a rumor at this point, but unfortunately a believeable one.

I hope any such rumors at this point are just rumors -- that help is being felt.

Quote:
As to the numbers of people dying, the initial estimates are ranging from 15-20 thousand, but that number will surely rise as more people are found trapped in their attics and drowned and further still from the disease that is sure to come.

I'm trying but words fail to describe what horror I'm being witness to. My access is very spotty, but I'll try and give updates when I can.

Thanks very much for what you've told us. I can't imagine the words that would describe.

I should probably apologize. I think that there are times whn I take all of this personally - like the pains of Katrina are designed to bring Jim down. As if I Jim should feel so sorry for himself as he sits here in high-and-dry Seattle sipping lemonade. I do feel really sad over all of this, though. I sooo wish that we could have done better. But enough...

I have tried to figure out how to respond/help in my very limited terms. I have to say -- so shoot me -- that I wouldn't give a freaking *dime* to the Red Cross given their horrible track record over the past decade. So what is a secular humanist to do? Giving money to "faith-based" soup kitchens is not an option....

So a few mights I watched news coverage of a town in Louisiana as they took in refugees and set them up on cots in the high school gym. The folks fluffing the pillows all seemed like really nice people just trying to help other humans - white, black, yellow, brown -- in need. So I emailed the Chamber of Commerce and they emailed back right away saying "You bet, we're gonna have a fund at the local bank starting Tuesday AM" and the woman included the phone number. So Tuesday I can send a few bucks to Louisiana to help out the folks camped out in the gym. I am not sure this is the best, most systematic way to respond. I would like to think that there is a very scientific, carefully-thought-out way to support these folks in need. And what about all of the other towns in Louisiana and elsewhere that didn't manage to get their names on network news? So maybe there's a place to develop a Katrina sister city program. In the meantime, I figure I can direct a few bucks to real people and, for better or worse, they can figure out who could use the help.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 03:22

Quote:
I have tried to figure out how to respond/help in my very limited terms. I have to say -- so shoot me -- that I wouldn't give a freaking *dime* to the Red Cross given their horrible track record over the past decade. So what is a secular humanist to do? Giving money to "faith-based" soup kitchens is not an option....


Try Americares . According to http://www.charitynavigator.org/ , they have less waste than just about anyone, I have heard a lot of good things about them from other boards, and they don't look religious at all.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 11:40

link
Quote:
EXCLUSIVE: BRITS' HELL INSIDE THE TERROR DOME
British students, Sarah Yorston, Jane Wheeldon, Jamie Trout, Marisa Haigh
TERRIFIED British students tell of dead bodies, rape, crack, gunshots, filth and a sickening stench filling the thick air.
From Ryan Parry, Us Correspondent, Inside The New Orleans Superdome

BRITISH students told yesterday how they stepped out of the horror of Hurricane Katrina into the hell of their Superdome "shelter".

A place of refuge became a terrifying trap, where knives and guns, crack cocaine use, threats of violence and racial abuse were rife.

Jamie Trout, 22, who kept a record of his four days there, said: "It was like something out of Lord of the Flies - one minute everything is calm and civil, the next it descends into chaos."

In one diary entry, he said: "A man has been arrested for raping a seven-year-old in the toilet, this place is hell, I feel sick. The smell is horrendous, there are toilets overflowing and people everywhere."

As the evacuation of the 70,000- capacity arena continued yesterday, the swamped city of New Orleans descended into near barbarism.

The looting and carjacking of recent days showed no sign of slowing. Gunfire was aimed at police and helicopters attempting to ferry the sick from hospitals, accompanied by shouts of: "You better come get my family."

Advertisement
Falk AdSolution

Ten thousand National Guardsmen were sent in from across the US to the flood-ravaged Gulf coast.

At least seven bodies lay unclaimed in the streets around the New Orleans Convention Centre - one a woman in a wheelchair covered by a blanket.

Daniel Edwards, 47, pointed at her and said: "I don't treat my dog like that...I buried my dog."

Amid criticism of government inaction, he added: "You can do everything for other countries but you can't do nothing for your own people.

"You can go overseas with the military but you can't get them down here."

Thousands of storm refugees massed outside the convention building, waiting for buses that never came. They had no food, water or medicines.

The Rev Issac Clark, 68, said: "We are out here like pure animals. We don't have help."

In what may be America's worst natural disaster for a century, 80 per cent of a city of 500,000 people was under water up to 20ft deep. Thousands could be dead.

At the Superdome, at least 25,000 people were moved out yesterday as New Orleans Mayor Nagin vowed: "Come hell or high water we will evacuate people today, I'll march them out if I have to." Soldiers with M16 assault rifles and grenade launchers tried to control crowds desperate to get out.

At least one person died in the arms of a soldier. A National Guardsman was wounded in the leg by his own gun in a struggle with two men and a military helicopter was shot at while ferrying away a casualty.

Brit diary-writer Jamie had been coaching football to disabled children as part of the Camp America scheme.

Jamie, who was with two friends, said: "We were in Miami for three or four days when Katrina first hit.

"We rode that storm out and then decided to go to New Orleans. We didn't realise the storm was heading that way."

He said of his eventual Superdome refuge: "There was a lot of heat from the people in there, people shouting racial abuse about us being white.

"The army warned us to keep our bags close to us and to grip them tight."

Jamie, an economics student from Sunderland, said he saw crack cocaine being used in the filthy toilets, youngsters breaking into soft drink machines and men brawling. Urine and excrement spilled into corridors where they were sleeping.

At one point, up to 30 British students gathered in the dome were so terrified of attack when the power went down that they set up a makeshift security cordon.

Zoe Smith, 21, from Hull, said: "All us girls sat in the middle while the boys sat on the outside, with chairs as protection.


"We were absolutely terrified, the situation had descended into chaos, people were very hostile and the living conditions were horrendous.

"We had to wash with tiny bottles of water, the sink was blocked and full of gunk. Even when we offered to help with the cleaning, the locals gave us abuse."

Some students said they saw an 18-inch knife confiscated from one man and many others had guns and other weapons.

Marisa Haigh, 23, from Guildford, who is studying at Birmingham University, and Claire Watkins, 23, a student from Bradford, had arrived in New Orleans last Saturday after a trip across the US.

Claire said: "We went out drinking on Saturday night and had an awesome time.

"On Sunday we had hangovers and hadn't heard or read anything about the hurricane coming in. We only realised there was something wrong when we went out in the street and no one was around, everywhere was shut or boarded up."

They were in the Superdome when Katrina hit. Marisa said: "There was a series of almighty bangs when the roof went and a panel flew off.

"There was a woman screaming, 'We're gonna die, we're all gonna die'."

Eventually many of the students were moved to the nearby basketball arena, thanks to Sgt Garland Ogden, a full-timer with the National Guard.

Jane Wheeldon, 20, said: "He went against a lot of rules to get us moved."

Yesterday Texas was ready to house 50,000 flood refugees - 25,000 of them in the Houston Astrodome, 350 miles away. The rest will go to San Antonio.

Rescue in some areas was suspended as looters ran amok.

Coast Guard Lt Cmdr Cheri Ben-Iesan said at emergency HQ: "Hospitals are trying to evacuate. At every one of them, there are reports that as the helicopters come in people are shooting at them, telling them, 'You better come get my family'. City leader Mitch Landrieu toured stricken areas and was besieged by rescued people begging him to pass information to their families.

His pocket was full of scraps of paper on which he had scribbled down their phone numbers.

He contacted a woman whose father had been saved and told her: "Your daddy's alive, and he said to tell you he loves you."

Landrieu added: "She just started crying. She said, 'I thought he was dead'."

In Britain, worried relatives of the Superdome students were told by the Mirror their loved ones were safe.

From details given to our reporters at the scene, we passed on messages to families nationwide.

Zoe Smith's mother Sharon said in Hull: "That's brilliant. It's been horrendous not knowing what on earth has happened to her. I have barely slept."

Fine art publisher Janet Murray, 55, from Frome, Somerset, whose daughter Hannah was stranded, said: "I had not heard anything, thanks so much for letting me know."


Who are the real racists?

Let me tell you my life story real quick. While I now reside in Europe, I grew up in the southern US, and I went to a predominantly (80-90%) black school in a poor neighborhood from 6th to 8th grade, and I saw more blatent racism there than I've seen anywhere else. And guess what... it was all black on white racism. Yes, I, a white male have experienced racism first hand. Never in my life have I seen a group of whites taunt, tease, and threat a black person for being black, but I've seen it - and experienced it - the other way around numerous times. Maybe you haven't realized it yet, but people colored other than white are capable of racism too. I know how blacks in parts of this country must have felt a few generations ago. I was the 'nigger' in that neighborhood.

So think first before you call me a racist just because I'm not afraid to point out a few obvious facts.

FACT - most of the refugees in NO and the superdome were poor. FACT - most of the refugees in NO and the superdome were black. FACT - there have been reports of murder, rape, utter chaos, pillaging of the city, and attacks on rescue workers. My opinion - many of the refugees have acted like savages, in a manner that I'd call uncivilized and unnormal. Whether it's because they're black, or because they're poor, or because of another reason, who knows - come to your own conclusion - but something is definitely wrong here. Unfoturnately, the acts of a few in that community are causing the lives of their own neighbors to be lost.


Billy
Posted by: tahir

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 11:46

I'd have to say that I agree at least partly with Billy's take on racism, I'm of Pakistani descent and a muslim, yes I've had racist abuse and discrimination, but then I know loads of Indian/pakistani/Black people that are just as racist and bigotted. Racism is not an exclusuively white problem.

Don't know enough about any of the rest of it to make an informed comment, haven't really followed it on the news.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 12:02

I have experienced the exact same thing. I lived in a predominantly black neighborhood when I moved here and have never been harassed like that for being white ever in my life. It's just hard to say that and not be labeled a racist. I have plenty of friends that are black and work with quite a few others. But most of the people that live in the projects are a completely different animal.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 12:18

By the way, a 7 year old girl was gang-raped at the convention center. Animals.
Posted by: genixia

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 13:22

Quote:
I have tried to figure out how to respond/help in my very limited terms. I have to say -- so shoot me -- that I wouldn't give a freaking *dime* to the Red Cross given their horrible track record over the past decade. So what is a secular humanist to do? Giving money to "faith-based" soup kitchens is not an option....


Habitat for Humanity?

I'm thinking about a more direct option too - rumors are that 2500 people are being evacuated to Boston's convention center. I'm contemplating walking in there once they arrive, randomly choosing a family and going clothes shopping for them.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 14:53

Quote:
While I now reside in Europe, I grew up in the southern US, and I went to a predominantly (80-90%) black school in a poor neighborhood from 6th to 8th grade, and I saw more blatent racism there than I've seen anywhere else.


Ah ha, I knew you weren't Dutch. After visiting there several times and knowing a couple of others in my life, I thought it was exceptionally odd that you were spouting the crap you were; the Dutch I know are better than that.

Quote:
Maybe you haven't realized it yet, but people colored other than white are capable of racism too.


Oh, I would certainly never deny that fact. But when you spout stuff like "the entire black population has become dependant" and "the vast majority (not all) of the people who stayed behind were the welfare and criminal class" and imply that Darwinism means these people should die, well, congratulations, you are one too.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 15:29

Quote:

Oh, I would certainly never deny that fact. But when you spout stuff like "the entire black population has become dependant" and "the vast majority (not all) of the people who stayed behind were the welfare and criminal class" and imply that Darwinism means these people should die, well, congratulations, you are one too.


Careful. I don't know what you have personally against this dude, but you have yet to put anything but emotion into the words.

My understanding from the online media, politicians, and local and law-enforcement officials, and somebody earlier in this thread who is THERE, was that "the vast majority (not all) of the people who stayed behind were the welfare and criminal class" is a fairly accurate assessment.

Slightly awkward wording perhaps, I might suggest using "classes" rather than class, just to emphasize potential differences and non-overlap between the welfare and criminal classes. But poverty (welfare class) and street crime (criminal class) have been proven across the USA (the world?) to have a high overlap.

EDIT: wait.. follow-up posting in the works

Cheers
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 15:44

Okay, I went back a page in this thread and re-read a number of posts by Billy.

Quote:
Maybe Springer should ask "if this happened in Idaho, would armed gangs be looting, murdering, raping, and attacking search and rescue teams?" Face it, this anarchy wouldn't happen in a 'red' county, and Orleans parish looks to be solidly 'blue':
...
My point about red and blue is that the 'have-nots' are usually very reliant on the state, which is a staple of the 'blue' side.



I don't know. I personally think the same chaos would have happened in any hot (temperature), densely populated USA city that was left without food, water, power, and policing for as long as NO was after the hurricane. But we won't know until it happens elsewhere.

Quote:
Politicians and officials should be blamed for late action or inadequate planning, but you can't blame them for the anarchy in NO that has hampered the rescue. You can't help people who refuse to help themselves.


That last remark is inflammatory. I feel that the vast majority of folks who were still in NO at the time of that remark were good people who simply wanted to be helped out of a very bad situation. A number of them might be not so good people, but still in need of assistance. They weren't hampering the rescue, and would aid themselves as much as they could.

The violent people with guns were/are far fewer, and are the ones in the way of the rescue operations (even today). It was a bad and tasteless generalization to lump them together with the others.

-ml
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 15:56

You know, the things that really bugs me about the discussion here is the belief of some that the violence in New Orleans was the result of all the black people, rather than the result of just plain anarchy. The fact is that violence is not a black condition, it is a human condition. Any society that has broken down erupts in violence, no matter what race the people are. To believe that if the people of New Orleans were white this wouldn't have happened is racist, as well as not having any basis in history. It was compared to Lord of the Flies in a post above, but that book was not written about black kids, but white ones. Certainly enough examples of lawless anarchy turning into violence can be found for any race of people throughout history. Any time that an area devolves into lawlessness, violence always follows, and the bigger the area the worse the problem. People die in riots all over the world all the time, and they don't have anywhere close to the number of people involved in this.

The problem isn't the fact these people are black or poor, it is that the goverment failed them on a massive scale not seen before in American history. The superdome was a hellhole no doubt, but where the hell were the cops? Where were the National Guard? Why were they there so long? Did they just take 25,000 traumatized and angry people that have just lost everything they owned, and in some cases everyone they loved, crowd them into a small space and then leave? The results should have been obvious, no matter what race they were.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 16:09

Quote:
Slightly awkward wording perhaps, I might suggest using "classes" rather than class, just to emphasize potential differences and non-overlap between the welfare and criminal classes.


That's the whole point. It is not the first time that he implied there was no non-overlap and those two classes are one and the same. black=poor=criminal.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 18:48

Yeah, I see where you're coming from. Each statement by itself isn't really all that bad (except for that last one, possibly), but the overall tone doesn't come across as decent.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 21:41

Yes, I did mean to use the word classes, eventhough those two groups overlap quite a bit. I don't understand why it's considered racist in the US these days to state facts like the majority of prison inmates are black, or the majority of black neighborhoods are poor, or that most of the refugees are black. Racism is a feeling of hatred, but these are facts. I don't hate black people - in fact I've had several very good black friends - but I'm honest enough with myself to observe that there's something wrong in the black community. Personally, I think it's their lack of family structures and their thug-like role models.

I don't think this would have happened in a white community. Perhaps it's because whites are on average wealthier than blacks in the US, so they don't see the need to steal a new TV, but who knows. People in europe seem less hesitant to point out racial differences than people in the US, but you're only fooling yourself if you think race hasn't played a role in NO in the last week. You have mostly white national guard units and most white (you call them rednecks) hunters and fishermen conducting the rescue effort, and mostly black refugees mixed in with mostly black criminals. The state of LA isn't like the city LA where people of every race live next to eachother in posh apartments. These black people in NO have lived only among other blacks for probably generations, and have a strong distrust of whitey, and then you have white people who have a strong distaste of blacks going back generations. It's two completely different cultures living side by side. It's no wonder that they're clashing in this situation.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 05/09/2005 21:53

Quote:
.. I'm honest enough with myself to observe that there's something wrong in the black community. Personally, I think it's their lack of family structures ..


Now, that is the first clear racist remark I've seen from you. Wrong, too. My experience with black americans is that their family ties are way stronger than I've observed from most non-black families. These people really feel their history and roots, and care deeply about feelings and personal relationships.

But so do a lot of other people.

Quote:
.. and their thug-like role models.


Whereas us non-blacks just have nice role models like Saddam Hussein, Dubya, The UniBomber, Terry Nichols, and that David Koresh guy.

Seriously, you were treading water (just) until that last tirade. Gotta learn to quit while you're still ahead in a few of our eyes. Too late.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 02:45

The National guard cordoned themselves in a corridor and protected themselves after one was killed when his rifle was forcibly removed and then used against him. 30 gard against 30000 refugees are NOT good odds. They had to pull back to protect themselves. I had a nice long chat with two of the thirty on Saturday. The police, btw, were riding the streets trying to save as many people as possible. For 72 hours straight without rest. Heros in MY book.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 04:42

Quote:
30 gard against 30000 refugees are NOT good odds.


Please don't get me wrong, I didn't mean to place any of the blame on the police forces in New Orleans, which I am sure were overstretched to the breaking point. I was thinking about why more weren't more brought in quickly from outside. I heard the police force in NO got hit really hard and their numbers were way down from normal from defections and other reasons. The stress of these days will haunt the ones that reported for the rest of their lives. They are indeed real heros. My anger is directed at the lack of support from the goverment.

Please tell me that you were exaggerating and that there were more than 30. I haven't seen the number of how many were supposed to be there, but it is clear regardless that a lots of people, in every branch of goverment, screwed up very very badly.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 05:59

Quote:
I don't understand why it's considered racist in the US these days to state facts like the majority of prison inmates are black, or the majority of black neighborhoods are poor, or that most of the refugees are black. Racism is a feeling of hatred, but these are facts.


Racism, as I've always understood it and as it is usually defined, doesn't necessarily have anything to do with hate. Lets see... here's a dictionary definition:
the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

So your walking the thin line of stating statistics that may indeed be factual, and extrapolating from that into statements like "Personally, I think it's their lack of family structures and their thug-like role models." I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you in fact DON'T believe that your statement applies to all black people in the US.

Being from LA I have also experienced racism from both sides more than I'd like to recall. It happens, but you can't let it define a people. It's a struggle when it's something you experience more times than not. It's a tough topic in general. Ugh... I've had to fight racist thoughts my whole life based on experience and being around racist family members growing up, implanting things at a young age. Do you count yourself among those who have a strong distaste of blacks going back generations? Be honest.

I just wish you had a bit more empathy for those affected by all this who aren't there by choice, and understanding that a majority of those left behind weren't looters, thugs, murderers, etc, but victims of them.

In the end, people are people are people. It serves no real purpose to separate everyone into color groups, because each community affects the other, they aren't worlds unto themselves. Those raping and pillaging were also Americans... does that really mean anything? Does it define us that they were a product of this country?

Classicism, that's the differentiating factor. Lack of money = lack of power = lack of education = lack of scope = desperation = etc etc etc...
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 07:25

Quote:

So your walking the thin line of stating statistics that may indeed be factual, and extrapolating from that into statements like "Personally, I think it's their lack of family structures and their thug-like role models." I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you in fact DON'T believe that your statement applies to all black people in the US.


I know for a fact that it doesn't apply to all black people. I have absolutely nothing against an individual black person based on the color of their skin. I'm just trying to point out that there are some big problems in their society.



Quote:
It's a struggle when it's something you experience more times than not. It's a tough topic in general. Ugh... I've had to fight racist thoughts my whole life based on experience and being around racist family members growing up, implanting things at a young age. Do you count yourself among those who have a strong distaste of blacks going back generations? Be honest.


Honestly, I wasn't brought up to dislike black people, so if there is some racism in me, it's based solely on personal experiences. Personally, I've found that skin color is no indication of what's in a person's heart. There are good people in every race, but it's hard not to have a distaste for parts of some races' culture.

I guess what I'm saying is if I meet a black person, I won't have anything against him and I might become friends with him, but I wouldn't want to live in a black neighborhood... I guess that is a little bit racist though...

Quote:

I just wish you had a bit more empathy for those affected by all this who aren't there by choice, and understanding that a majority of those left behind weren't looters, thugs, murderers, etc, but victims of them.

In the end, people are people are people. It serves no real purpose to separate everyone into color groups, because each community affects the other, they aren't worlds unto themselves. Those raping and pillaging were also Americans... does that really mean anything? Does it define us that they were a product of this country?


Well said. This disaster probably hit closer to home for you than for most people. If I came off as callous, I apologize. This whole disaster is a tragedy.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 07:36

Quote:
Quote:
.. I'm honest enough with myself to observe that there's something wrong in the black community. Personally, I think it's their lack of family structures ..


Now, that is the first clear racist remark I've seen from you. Wrong, too. My experience with black americans is that their family ties are way stronger than I've observed from most non-black families. These people really feel their history and roots, and care deeply about feelings and personal relationships.

But so do a lot of other people.

Quote:
.. and their thug-like role models.


Whereas us non-blacks just have nice role models like Saddam Hussein, Dubya, The UniBomber, Terry Nichols, and that David Koresh guy.

Seriously, you were treading water (just) until that last tirade. Gotta learn to quit while you're still ahead in a few of our eyes. Too late.


What I mean by lack of family structure is children with no father around. And by role models, I'm talking about the rap stars that have glorified murder and stealing for the last 20 years.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 13:08

Unfortunately, I am not exagerating. There were 30. Their contingent was intended to be a humanitarian effort, not a peace-keeping one. Things just got real ugly real fast. That situation has been rectified now. There are thousands there now.
Posted by: mlord

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 14:01

Quote:
children with no father around.


So, like your average CEO of any major corporation.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 06/09/2005 14:59

Read this editorial by Anne Rice in the NYT (don't worry, it's short). Pretty well sums the situation up in my eyes.
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 06/09/2005 20:49

"My first thought was, he lied in every word"

I don't typically share in the political side of these discussion as that's how I feel about every politician I've ever encountered. Nagin, Blanco, Edwards, Roemer, Morial, Bush, Clinton...names change but lies and spin seems to be the only consistent things. I first registered to vote in New Orleans so my cynicism is well founded and I feel like some finger pointing is due me too.

During the Northridge or Loma Prieta earthquake or Mount St. Helen's eruption, how fast was response by state and federal authorities? Or on the other coast, after Hurricane Andrew wiped out Homestead, how quickly did the various agencies show up? What is done for disaster planning in other areas prone to natural disasters? What are FEMA responsibilities vs what are local authorities' responsibilities and when? Help me understand what was supposed to happen after the levees breached.

It boggles my mind that the New Orleans mayor and the LA governor did not have this scenario as priority number 1? The city is surrounded by water on 3 sides making relief efforts difficult if not impossible in the event of a direct strike. The city is 8 feet below sea level and Category 3 surges at 9-12 feet above normal. You do the math.

Since 1965, the Army Corp of Engineers and anyone who picked up the Times-Picayune knew even a Cat 3 hurricane stalled over the city would breach the levees. Federal funding for levee improvements? It would have taken 10-15 years to raise the levees. Why wasn't this an issue 15 years ago, when it would have made a difference?

Then someone tell me what was supposed to happen before the levees breached??? I ask because I am obviously missing something here. I've listened to the Nagin sound bite. I read the Anne Rice editorial that Loren posted. I keep coming back to the question. Why are state and city officials not being painted with the same brush as Bush and FEMA? They deserve it, doubly so.

How the hell do you have 20% of the people living below the poverty line and not have a plan to get them out of the city? How could there not have been a contingency plan by local and state officials to evacuate people who had no means to do so themselves? Nagin issued a mandatory evacuation order on Sunday with a Cat 4 hurricane a day away. Every study that I've seen says it takes at least 72 hours to evacuate the 400,000+ residents of New Orleans. Please hold on to those "Nagin for President" bumper stickers. They'll be as valuable as those "Vote for the Crook. It's important!" ones.

When I moved from New Orleans in 1997, the hottest political topic was not hurricanes or that the city was sinking, but instead speculation over who hadn't bribed who in the closing of the new Harrah's Casino. A long line of politicians abandoned New Orleanians years before Katrina made landfall last week.

The people of New Orleans did not ask for or deserve what happened, regardless of who they are or where they lived. I'm sure that they will rebuild, much like people in San Francisco or Pensacola rebuilt but I truly hope that their memories are long.
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 06/09/2005 21:11

What he said...

Blame Amid the Tragedy

Quote:
In addition, unlike the governors of New York, Oklahoma and California in past disasters, Gov. Blanco failed to take charge of the situation and ensure that the state emergency operation facility was in constant contact with Mayor Nagin and FEMA. It is likely that thousands of people died because of the failure of Gov. Blanco to implement the state plan, which mentions the possible need to evacuate up to one million people. The plan clearly gives the governor the authority for declaring an emergency, sending in state resources to the disaster area and requesting necessary federal assistance.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 06/09/2005 22:04

Quote:
Why are state and city officials not being painted with the same brush as Bush and FEMA?

You're right, and I'm sure they will be. However, right now, only FEMA can actually do anything about it, and the overwhelming opinion is that they have failed to do so in a timely manner, despite the fact that this is precisely what they exist to do.

Steps should have been taken years ago by all involved, from local to federal, but now that the shit has hit the fan, the shitcleaners seem to be staring at it wondering what to do. The reason that people should be complaining about that specifically right now is to get them off of their asses and do their jobs.

To put it in terms with which we're probably mostly more familiar, what if your computer network was the victim of a virus and the people in charge of restoring data were just sitting there as if nothing was amiss? Would you yell at the storage folks or would you yell at the network admins?
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 06/09/2005 22:10

This hurricane could have come 10 or 20 years ago and even more people would have died. New Orleans was a doomed city. Everyone knew it. It was just a question of when. Technology just couldn't keep up with mother nature.
If they rebuild NO, it can be flooded by another hurricane next year. I bet more people will heed the evactuation order then.
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 06/09/2005 23:36

This debate will boil down to when aid was requested vs when it was delivered which is why I was asking what happened in other areas ie "timely manner". IIRC, based on the drill done 13 months ago, it was planned to take 3 days to mobilize the people necessary to respond to the crisis to be coordinated by local and state resources. Why 3 days and why work wasn't done to respond faster than 3 days? I wouldn't want to wait 3 days for data retrieval or to be cut out of my attic when I was drowning.
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 06/09/2005 23:51

I agree it was a question of when a hurricane of significant size would hit in the right location. Doomed though? No I don't think so.

Quote:
"I bet more people will heed the evactuation order then".


Nice. You've got my troll vote.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 00:20

Well, the other side of the coin is that, notionally, the federal government has been specifically preparing for four years for a huge disaster, albeit one prompted by terrorism as opposed to weather. But what if the levees had been destroyed by terrorist bombs instead of by a hurricane? The results would have been virtually identical, and they still would have performed poorly. Why have we been giving up our civil liberties if this is the best they can do?

Again, though, I think you're correct in that the Federal Government is not the only one at fault here.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 05:51

Definitely. As much as I want to get behind Nagin in all of this, it was a ginormous failure of government and bureaucracy on all levels. The disconnect is just astounding, and now they are all putting off the inevitable blame game and maybe rightfully so. The worst part is that they all acknowledge a lot went wrong... every single official on every level I've seen asked a grilling question comes up with that answer: "Yes, things went wrong. There will be a time to investigate what did and how to fix it, that time is not now" but we all know that in the end no heads will roll. They'll all just pat themselves and each other on the back and move on, most definitely so at the higher levels. At least on the lower levels you can SEE the guilt in the faces of those in charge... at least I feel like I can in Blanco's. I think the anger of a lot of the local officials, Parish Presidents, Nagin, et al. is misplaced guilt. Not that they don't truly have the lack of Federal response to be angry at...

I'm rambling, but at any rate, I agree. The breakdown on all levels is staggering and most of all scary as all hell.

I just bought my ticket to New Baton Rouge this morning... one way. I'm headed home to see what I can do.

Does anyone have any ideas on how some like me could contribute in a specialized way? I'm thinking along the lines of organizing getting net access in a shelter, or some things along that line.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 06:05

Quote:
I don't typically share in the political side of these discussion as that's how I feel about every politician I've ever encountered. Nagin, Blanco, Edwards, Roemer, Morial, Bush, Clinton...names change but lies and spin seems to be the only consistent things. n it would have made a difference?


Funny, one of my best friends from high school is Buddy Roemer's son. He posts on my website now and again... he mentioned something about how his dad was pacing and pissed and how if HE was governor still, things would be different. Had to laugh at that.
Posted by: JeffS

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 07/09/2005 09:36

Sigh. Perhaps I am completely insensitive, but this just seems silly. Are the people who just lost everything really concerned about being called "refugees"? In what way is this a "racist" term? Even Bush seems to think that there is some problem with the word (I wonder if he's just trying to show his sensitive side).

I'll tell you, there were a ton of real people in our church this Sunday, some with family who'd lost everything and others who actually came from NO. The sheer numbers were overwhelming. We had no sermon- rather we spend the entire worship service listening to people's stories and praying for them.

Those stories are the real deal. The people suffering and dying in NO right now are the real deal. And I don't think any of them care one lick whether you call them "refugees", "flood victims", or "survivors". They have more important things going on right now.
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 10:26

Quote:
I just bought my ticket to New Baton Rouge this morning... one way. I'm headed home to see what I can do


Bravo. I'm headed down with a group from my church with a load of supplies this evening. A couple hundred gallons of gas, baby supplies (diapers, formula), feminine supplies, etc. Stuff that is highly needed but not to the point of being distributed by the govmt. Probably won't get much further west then Biloxi. I'll try to document the trip as best I can if anyone is interested.
Posted by: frog51

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 10:43

Actually, I know I am pretty much a no-religion atheist type but this is one thing that I do approve of...church groups can be so amazingly kind, caring and giving to those in real need.

I'm not saying atheists aren't, but a church can give a good focus for care...
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 13:48

Hmm. It seems the Bush administration declared a state of emergency for the Louisiana Gulf Coast on August 27 (before Katrina's landfall in Louisiana, and well before the levees breached) which gave authority to FEMA.

To quote, in case that goes away:
Quote:
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
August 27, 2005

Statement on Federal Emergency Assistance for Louisiana

The President today declared an emergency exists in the State of Louisiana and ordered Federal aid to supplement state and local response efforts in the parishes located in the path of Hurricane Katrina beginning on August 26, 2005, and continuing.

The President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives, protect property and public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the parishes of Allen, Avoyelles, Beauregard, Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Claiborne, Catahoula, Concordia, De Soto, East Baton Rouge, East Carroll, East Feliciana, Evangeline, Franklin, Grant, Jackson, LaSalle, Lincoln, Livingston, Madison, Morehouse, Natchitoches, Pointe Coupee, Ouachita, Rapides, Red River, Richland, Sabine, St. Helena, St. Landry, Tensas, Union, Vernon, Webster, West Carroll, West Feliciana, and Winn.

Specifically, FEMA is authorized to identify, mobilize, and provide at its discretion, equipment and resources necessary to alleviate the impacts of the emergency. Debris removal and emergency protective measures, including direct Federal assistance, will be provided at 75 percent Federal funding.

Representing FEMA, Michael D. Brown, Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, named William Lokey as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 13:56

And FEMA recruited 1500 firefighters across the country to go into New Orleans. To hand out flyers. Oh, and appear at Bush photo-ops.
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 14:54

Quote:
lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the parishes of...

... neither Orleans, nor Jefferson, nor Plaquemines. Were these worst-hit parishes already under a state of emergency, then?

Peter
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 15:08

That's weird. Didn't notice that the most-affected ones were left out. They were added on the 29th, which is still before the levee broke.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 16:28

Quote:
I'll try to document the trip as best I can if anyone is interested.


I would be. I have another friend of a friend making a trip down there with a 50 foot truck filled with stuff we bought and am awaiting word from them as well.
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 16:54

Check out the latest news. They're one step away from a forced evacuation of New Orleans. I'd suggest that a drive-in-and-help-out mission would be effective for other coastal communities where no such evacation is in effect.

Meanwhile, my wife had a great idea for how we can help out, once things settle down. She teaches communication and presentation skills. That includes resume writing and mock interviews. I can round up undergrads with computers and printers to help out. Hopefully, we can help set up some of the Houston refugees with jobs.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 07/09/2005 17:02

Here's some interesting stuff:

The Guardian says that there is no substantiation of murder and rape in the Superdome, and have a quote from the NO Chief of Police.

The FAA says "We're controlling every single aircraft in that airspace and none of them reported being fired on".
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 07/09/2005 17:27

I wondered about that because of how I heard the story. First it was a woman was raped. Then a woman was raped in the Superdome. Then it was a 7yr. old raped in the Superdome. Then it was a 7yr. old gang-raped in the Superdome.

It seemed to be getting embellished each time. And I was thinking...when you're shoved into a stadium with 20000 odd people and a load of national guard, where do you find somewhere to do that without someone stepping in?
Posted by: peter

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 18:02

Quote:
Nagin issued a mandatory evacuation order on Sunday with a Cat 4 hurricane a day away. Every study that I've seen says it takes at least 72 hours to evacuate the 400,000+ residents of New Orleans.

Unfortunately, 72 hours before landfall was Friday morning, when it was neither Category 4 nor headed for New Orleans. NHC's landfall forecast wandered substantially westwards over time: 72 hours before landfall, Katrina was headed to the Florida panhandle (hit Stop and advance to Frame 12), as a Category 1.

Peter
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 07/09/2005 18:38

Quote:
And I was thinking...when you're shoved into a stadium with 20000 odd people and a load of national guard, where do you find somewhere to do that without someone stepping in?

While I agree that the urban-legend effect is clearly at work, there was little authority presence in the Superdome and utterly none whatsoever in the Convention Center. It's not implausible that some sort of crime may have occured at the Superdome.
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 20:43

I understand but once the hurricane re-entered the Gulf on Saturday, it was clear to all concerned that evacuation should begin but nothing was done for the people they knew couldn't leave on their own. At that point, 20,000 people could have evacuated using public buses. Buses should have been staged on the upper deck of the Superdome to evacuate people instead of sitting in flooded lots.

AT 10 AM CDT...1500Z...A HURRICANE WATCH IS IN EFFECT FOR THE
SOUTHEASTERN COAST OF LOUISIANA EAST OF MORGAN CITY TO THE MOUTH OF
THE PEARL RIVER...INCLUDING METROPOLITAN NEW ORLEANS AND LAKE
PONCHARTRAIN. A HURRICANE WATCH MEANS THAT HURRICANE CONDITIONS
ARE POSSIBLE WITHIN THE WATCH AREA...GENERALLY WITHIN 36 HOURS.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR 115 MPH...185 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER
GUSTS. KATRINA IS A CATEGORY THREE HURRICANE ON THE SAFFIR-SIMPSON
SCALE. SOME STRENGTHENING IS FORECAST DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS...
AND KATRINA COULD BECOME A CATEGORY FOUR HURRICANE.

"Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a test. This is the real deal," New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin said at a news conference.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 20:52

I totally agree, especially given that picture of school buses in a flooded parking lot linked above.

But, in all honesty, where were they going to bus these people to? If people hadn't gotten stranded in New Orleans, if the city had gotten flooded and everyone got out safely beforehand, there wouldn't be all these cities and private citizens opening up to them. And if they'd had somewhere to go, many of them probably would have gone there to begin with. But the desperately poor don't have family and friends in far-flung places, nor can they afford to rent a hotel room.
Posted by: Mach

Re: Hurricane Katrina Questions - 07/09/2005 21:12

The Lafayette Cajundome would be the first place that come to mind. Worst case scenario, the buses could have been there after the hurricane blew through for driving people out. Whether they had some place to go or could afford to get there should have been taken into account by city disaster planning.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 08/09/2005 14:08

Quote:
[Michael Brown] has no prior emergency management experience prior to taking his current post

Well, he held another position inside FEMA for a while, but only for a year or two.

The best part, the part that's absurd to the point of hilarity (if hundreds of thousands of lives hadn't been potentially affected or ended by it, that is) is that his job before FEMA, for eleven years, was as the Commisioner of Judges and Stewards for the International Arabian Horse Association. That's right: he was in charge of horse shows. And almost as good is the fact that he was forced to resign because of lawsuits over disciplinary actions that the IAHA won, but was eventually bankrupted by.

Maybe he worked for the AKC at one point, too, because this sure feels like a dog and pony show.
Posted by: CrackersMcCheese

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 03:49

Sky News I think have it all summed up nicely:



Maybe because he did this? ....

Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 04:15

It appears that Brown's resume is exaggerated according to Time Magazine. Not only does it suck ass, but he had to lie just to get it to the current state of suckassedness. Fascinating.

Other Katrina-related outrages of the day:

Bush suspends minimum wage requirements so that the rebuilding effort can be done on the cheap (CNN Money)

White folk ponder a New New Orleans without those pesky brown people (Wall Street Journal by way of Raw Story)

And, finally, some comic relief from a particularly zealous Dick Cheney fan.
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 05:00

Nice Photoshop, but you don't need to exaggerate things to make him look bad though.

Still, 35% of Americans say the goverment did a good or great job. The disconnect from reality is amazing. a completely parallel universe. My anger has once again mellowed and melted into disgust. I really need to get the hell out of this crazy-ass country, I can't see how there is any hope that people will come to their senses.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 05:21

Quote:

Bush suspends minimum wage requirements so that the rebuilding effort can be done on the cheap (CNN Money)

That's pretty unreal. Is there any way this is a good thing? Why not make the rebuilding a huge public works project? Let the people of the city rebuild their city instead of allowing contractors to make a bundle and pay unfair wages. Man. WTF is going on in this country.. the disconnect of the wealthy is just mind blowing.
Posted by: BAKup

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 13:14

I see those two articles, and raise you thiss.

White House Enacts a Plan to Ease Political Damage

This is the NYT, not the Onion.
Posted by: matthew_k

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 13:25

To be fair, he didn't suspend the minimum wage laws, he suspended the prevailing wage laws. The only time prevailing wage laws do anything is when non-union employees work on a federal job, they're paid union rates. I'm not saying this is all right, but I was initially horrified that he would suspend the federal minimum wage.

Matthew
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 14:20

Thank you, that explains it a bit more.
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 15:16


Quote:
Maybe because he did this? ....

Did what? Played the G chord at the wrong fret?

(Sorry. Guitarists always look for that sort of thing. )
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 15:17

Ah, I didn't appreciate the difference between prevailing and minimum wages. Guess I should have read the article a little closer. Still a very questionable decision.
Posted by: BAKup

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 15:36

And now this.

FEMA Chief Taken Off Hurricane Relief Efforts

I think the spin is going to be faster than the hurricane itself, and this is just the beginning.
Posted by: DWallach

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 17:02

But... will he get a medal?
Posted by: BAKup

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 18:24

Quote:
But... will he get a medal?


You've been reading too much Fark
Posted by: JeffS

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 19:38

Quote:
Sorry. Guitarists always look for that sort of thing.
Hey, I represent that remark!

My first thought was- "what chord does he think he's playing?" Then- "oh, I guess that's not really the point of these photos, is it?"
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 19:41

I kept looking for a capo.

Maybe that's why the guy in the background looks concerned and is reaching for Bush's hands:

Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 20:28

...And that guitar was purchased with your tax dollars. Note the presidential seal?
Posted by: Robotic

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 20:52

Quote:
...And that guitar was purchased with your tax dollars. Note the presidential seal?

That would be funny, but actually the instrument was a gift from the performer. Yahoo news link.
Posted by: canuckInOR

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 22:44

Quote:

Quote:
Maybe because he did this? ....

Did what? Played the G chord at the wrong fret?

I think you're reading too much into that... that was just something he does with his fingers when playing air guitar. Any resemblance to a real chord is coincidental.
Posted by: canuckInOR

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 09/09/2005 22:45

Quote:
Maybe because he did this? ...

I'll one up you on the silly photo department...

Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 10/09/2005 00:49

Quote:
I'll one up you on the silly photo department...

Why, that fish is...

...white!
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 08:16

An interesting article on law and order keeping in NOLA.
Posted by: bbowman

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 11:31

He's not trying to play a chord, he's flipping us off!
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 11:59

No, Clapton is flipping us off each time he plays an A-family barre chord.



I haven't seen any other guitarists finger those chords quite that way, but I always giggle a little every time I see Clapton play.
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 12:51

I seem to remember an interview with him in which he stated that he specifically learned to play that barre chord that way when he was a kid just for that reason.
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 18:24

Well, it looks like we have a fall guy. Look for him to pop up in a week or two as either a lobbyist or a representative of a corporation looking to profit off of the rebuilding of the affected areas, as his predecessor was.
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 18:49

In the article tonyc posted:
Quote:
Some homes along Bush's route were marked "0 D 0 A," meaning searchers had found no people inside dead or alive.


Did anyone else immediately think "carriage return, line feed"?
Posted by: tonyc

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 19:26

Quote:
Did anyone else immediately think "carriage return, line feed"?


"You know you're a geek when..."
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 20:04

Quote:
I seem to remember an interview with him in which he stated that he specifically learned to play that barre chord that way when he was a kid just for that reason.

Okay, that's utterly hilarious. I had no idea.
Posted by: JBjorgen

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 21:59

Ok...back on topic...I've posted pictures of my trip and started filling in the commentary here.
Posted by: visuvius

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 12/09/2005 22:10

Nice documentation. Wow, just wow. The destruction of the McDonalds is insane. Its like the enire middle was blown out.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 13/09/2005 01:24

My cousin's second story was removed and placed not-so-gently on his neighbor's house. My bosses shed was thrown OVER his 3 story house. The metal gates on the sides of the house were intact, so it had to go over. Weird stuff.
Posted by: frog51

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 13/09/2005 05:55

I thought everyone did it...I certainly do, but then Clapton was my idol when learning guitar so maybe I picked it up subconsciously?
Posted by: bonzi

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 13/09/2005 09:59

I certainly hope this Mail on Sunday article is at least exaggerated
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 13/09/2005 21:34

Argh. I walked out of the Red Cross headquarters here in Baton Rouge early today... sick of doing busy work. I've been helping run phone and data lines for IP phones for the past two days, but Vic, the retired phone guy I've been shadowing, ran out of things for me to do and had me taping up cables to the bottoms of the fold out tables they had covering the expanse of the gutted closed down Wal Mart. Combined with the feeling of wasting my time, I overheard a couple of families at the fenced in entrance asking for assistance. That being the operational headquarters, they don't have any services there for "clients" (what the Red Cross calls those they help)... so I saw them turned away and being told to call a 1-800 number, a number close to no one has been able to get through on for 3 days. One guy was pretty pissed and for good reason, he has been trying to get a family into shelters for days, and said that since the phone numbers weren't working he figured he'd come down in person to get the info... and they had nothing for him. The guy guarding the gate just avoided his questions... it was pretty appalling. I also witnessed the waste and glut of money the Red Cross has at it's disposal: We had started setting up a small call center on the fold out tables that were setup. We went to take a break and when we came back, all the tables we had sort of wired up were gone and were being replaced with brand new ones that some guy had ordered because the old ones were "too old"... which was ridiculous. They were in perfect shape, just not glossy on top. "There goes someone's relief card," said Sherman, the retired engineer and long time Red Cross volunteer I was working with.

The Red Cross had tons of satellite and database problems today and it showed... I witnessed a lot of calls being dropped. Can you imagine calling a number for DAYS at a time and finally getting through, only to have the call cut out on you?!

All that said, for the geek side of me the tech behind the operation was pretty cool to see and be a part of. Servers in shock mount crates with sat. uplinks that were plug and play, with Cisco IP phones EVERYWHERE. I wish I had my digital camera with me to show some photos of the operation floor. Pretty crazy, and very ad hoc with cables strung from the ceiling and running all over the place.

Monday morning before Mom and I went to the Red Cross we shuttled goods around for VOA which felt like helping at least. So... I'm gonna find somewhere else to give a hand. Not having my own car is a real issue around here... and traffic is ungodly. If I had my own car I think I'd head to the Gulf Coast... seems like they still have some areas in desperate need. Haven't figured out what I'll be doing tomorrow yet. Maybe I'll go back to the Red Cross and get in with another group, but the corporate feel of the place is sort of stymieing.
Posted by: Robotic

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 13/09/2005 22:48

GO LOREN!!
YAY!
Posted by: ninti

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 14/09/2005 04:32

Quote:
I also witnessed the waste and glut of money the Red Cross has at it's disposal


You know, I have heard more and more first-hand stories like that about how bad the Red Cross is. Makes me very glad I gave my money to other groups instead.
Posted by: lectric

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 14/09/2005 12:46

Thanks Loren, we really do appreciate it.
Posted by: loren

Re: Hurricane Katrina - 14/09/2005 22:52

Quote:
Thanks Loren, we really do appreciate it.


You're welcome. I'm in touch with the CU Wireless guys... I'll post an explanation and request for some stuff shortly!