Very useless observation

Posted by: ithoughti

Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 11:18

Did you know that Mr. Fabris has 11.6% (and rising) of all the posts in this BBS?

wow

i think i'm at about .0005%

//matt
Posted by: Dignan

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 11:20

Oh my god! Over 7000? I remember when he had 3000. And that was only yesterday
Posted by: fusto

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 11:34

I wonder what percentage of those posts are pointing people to the faq?

Posted by: PaulH

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 12:26

Top ten is here http://empeg.comms.net/php/addons/ubbtposters.php
Posted by: tfabris

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 12:36

Guess that means I'm responsible for most of the "noise".
Posted by: Dignan

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 13:12

Ah darn, I've been pushed out of the top ten. I was #7 at one point.

That's just as well. Everyone on the top ten helps people out a lot and contributes a great amount to the board. Keep it up, guys!

(hooray, soon I will also have over 1000
Posted by: rob

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 16:34

It looks like Tony has almost three times as much time on his hands as I do

Rob
Posted by: hybrid8

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 16:35

I think I'm going to have to slow down posting. Otherwise I'll be on that hit-list soon.

I just wish there were a way for Tony to premptively tell people to check the FAQ. We need some type of mind-ray. Of course then there are those folks with the tinfoil hats...

Bruno
Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 17:47

Bruno: Of course then there are those folks with the tinfoil hats...


Bruno,

Anyone wearing a tinfoil hat is by definition crazy! They are completely ineffective!!!! It is well known that [censored] have increased the Gamma! Your only hope is to rush to Home Depot and buy some [censored] with very high [censored] content and use that.

This should be in the FAQ!
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 20:04

Greetings!

Actually, I find Mu_Metal foil (typically used in reducing radiated noise in car installations) very effective against the long range ray devices. It doesn't help with the close range / hand held devices, but if you are letting THEM get that close, you already have problems... Search for item 127COF2 on Crutchfield. Just don't buy too much at any one time - it looks suspicious...
Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 20:27

Hmmm. We'va had a few messages about Mu_Metal, but I just assumed it was disnoise from [censored]. Anything would be better than the [censored] -based [censored] from Home Depot. It's heavy! My neck is always sore.

Paul, we'd like to just trust you on this, but would it be OK if I set up a video conference with [censored] to get a look at your pinkie finger???
Posted by: BAKup

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 21:18

Does this have anything to do with the [censored], [censored] and [censored] projects that the Empeg team are working on? If not, I could tell you about [censored] project, but then I'd have to [censored] you, then go commit [censored].

Posted by: jimhogan

Re: Very useless observation - 01/02/2002 23:10

BAKup: Does this have anything to do with the.... projects that the Empeg team are working on?

We're not sure. I was able to get a fairly good snapshot of Rob and Hugo's hands one time but then  5 Ÿ ŸOJ QJ ^J aJ #h³S, B*CJ OJ QJ ^J aJ ph ÿ hå,Ý CJ OJ QJ ^J aJ h³S, CJ
·

 , ­ Ì Z ‡ û    y ’ ` k s ¾ Î K X h u
Posted by: gbeer

Re: EXTRA Very useless observation - 02/02/2002 13:49

Looks like Tony has just about out posted the next five combined!!!
Posted by: dionysus

Re: Very useless observation - 03/02/2002 14:51

Hmm... I'm slacking; starting to fall off the list:)-mark