jEmplode 52

Posted by: mschrag

jEmplode 52 - 19/01/2004 09:12

http://www.inzyme.com/rio/empeg

new search query parser ( http://www.inzyme.com/rio/empeg/QueriesAndTagNames.html )

double click on playlist in "Add To Playlist" dialog selects playlist

free space progress bar turns into overall sync progress bar during a sync

soups totally rewritten -- should be significantly faster (and maybe broken, but it looks OK)

download logo in logoedit

rebuild on PC option (this is slow, but seems more reliable than the fast rebuild option for me on alpha 5 -- your mileage may vary)

reboot after rebuild

refreshing connection selection dialog should work a lot better now

fixed bug with Add To Playlist creating a soup playlist in the tree

setting artist, album, year, or genre on a playlist "rolls down" to all the children of the playlist
Posted by: Jerz

Re: jEmplode 52 - 19/01/2004 11:22

Is it just me or are we creating soups backwards now?

For example if I want an Artist/Album playlist by first letter of the Artist I have to now:

Create Album tag then Artist Tag then First Letter by Artist Tag.

Before it was backwards creating First letter by artist tag, artist tag, then album.

??
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 19/01/2004 11:39

Whoops. Give me a minute to fix that ...
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 19/01/2004 11:42

reuploading now ... give it like 10 minutes
Posted by: image

Re: jEmplode 52 - 19/01/2004 12:34

rebuild on PC option
is this basically the commmand line rebuild included in the GUI? i'm at work so i haven't gotten a chance to mess with it.
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 19/01/2004 13:02

yep ...
Posted by: Jerz

Re: jEmplode 52 - 19/01/2004 21:00

NICE! The PC build option seems work very well with my alpha player...

Edit: Well it seemed to build the a playlist the first time anyway. Oh well, still a nice improvement to work with v2.00 final.
Posted by: Micman2b

Re: jEmplode 52 - 20/01/2004 20:25

I've got a slightly irritating question.. what is the best way of installing v52 on a win XP machine? Is this as simple as replacing the .zip'ped files and the jar file to the existing jemplode folder? (C:\Program Files\jEmplode)

Sean in NC
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 20/01/2004 20:31

Well, to me, the easiest way is just install java from http://www.java.com and then you can just double-click jemplode.jar and put it wherever you want. But if you want the .exe file to run it, then you can just replace jemplode.jar, but you'll want to delete graphics.jar from the plugins folder (I rolled that back into the main jar).
Posted by: mlord

Re: jEmplode 52 - 27/01/2004 18:12

Mmm... "Revert Changes" doesn't work like I expected.

I futzed around in Jemplode, without doing a sync, and then clicked on "Revert Changes". It promptly initiated a sync.

What the fsck.. ?
Posted by: tfabris

Re: jEmplode 52 - 27/01/2004 18:14

I futzed around in Jemplode, without doing a sync, and then clicked on "Revert Changes". It promptly initiated a sync.
Are you sure it was a sync? Maybe it was just downloading the database again from scratch. That's what it's supposed to do.
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 27/01/2004 18:28

It /should/ be a download. If it's not that's definitely a bug.
Posted by: mlord

Re: jEmplode 52 - 27/01/2004 18:39

It checked for the need for an fsck, and then rebuilt the databases on the player. Looked like a sync to me. I don't think any of the changes I was discarding were actually applied.

Cheers
Posted by: image

Re: jEmplode 52 - 29/01/2004 00:49

switching on fast rebuild in v52 does not work at all. doesn't seem to upload the database. bleh

[edit]ok, i found out that BOTH fast rebuild and pc rebuild has to be on for it to work. weir... er, odd.[/edit]
Posted by: image

Re: jEmplode 52 - 09/02/2004 15:31

hmm, seems like jemplode53 has been out for a little while now. what is it this week with unannounced releases =).
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 09/02/2004 15:35

http://empeg.comms.net/php/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=hackers_prog&Number=200815 ?
Posted by: image

Re: jEmplode 52 - 09/02/2004 16:02

i'm tripping. monday stinks.
Posted by: zexpe

Re: jEmplode 52 - 10/02/2004 07:45

With all versions of jEmplode since v47 I haven't been able to download songs that are stored on the second hard disc in my empeg. I just get the error message "unable to get input stream". No such problem with v44.

Ross
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 12/02/2004 06:47

Weird ... I'm guessing there's a bug in the FTP code that figures out what drive your tune is on. You could temporarily turn off Use Hijack When Possible and I bet it would work. I'll look into it also when I finish the project I'm working on now.
Posted by: mlord

Re: jEmplode 52 - 12/02/2004 09:39

Mmm.. Just doing a get from /empeg/fids0/ will work, regardless of the drive..
Posted by: mschrag

Re: jEmplode 52 - 12/02/2004 09:43

So that's really weird then .. I was guessing that I was accidentally asking for the file on fids0 when it was on fids1, but if you're saying that would work regardless, then I'm at a bit of a loss. I'll have to look into this more.

Anyone else with two drives having this problem?
Posted by: mlord

Re: jEmplode 52 - 12/02/2004 09:53

Well, if Jemplode asks for /drive0/fids/xxxx then it will NOT automatically try both drives. It only works for /empeg/fids0/xxxx (and fids1).

Or at least I think it still works that way..

cheers
Posted by: mlord

Re: jEmplode 52 - 12/02/2004 10:00

Ahh.. nevermind.. I just looked at the code, and if the file request is from kftpd, then it does NOT mangle the pathnames. But if HTTP is used, it WILL automatically try both drives.

Cheers
Posted by: Daria

Re: jEmplode 52 - 12/02/2004 10:20

Is that deliberate?
Posted by: mlord

Re: jEmplode 52 - 12/02/2004 11:02

Yes, it is deliberate.

FTP is used for backups and stuff, and so has to be accurate.

HTTP is used by various web interfaces for playlist browsing, and has to transparently find the FIDS when asked.

Cheers