I thought the logic was:
1.0 - first mainstream release
1.0x - minor bug fixes
1.1 - major restructuring and product polishing
1.x - additional revisions and fine tuning, feature adding
2.0 - VR added
2.0x - minor bug fixes
2.x - major revisions
... ...

does this not seem right?

Or you could conform to current M$ initiated trends and call it empegcar 2001, 2003 etc


Murray 06000047
I don't think, therefore I am not.