Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#130399 - 11/12/2002 22:59 picture of remote
image
old hand

Registered: 28/04/2002
Posts: 770
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
anyone got a bitmap or gif of the rio remote? i really don't want to download and lineup all those little gifs in the button guide. i figured it was about time someone ported the remote to omniremote for palmos.

Top
#130400 - 11/12/2002 23:05 Re: picture of remote [Re: image]
Waterman981
old hand

Registered: 14/02/2002
Posts: 804
Loc: Salt Lake City, UT
How about the one in Charcoalgray99's web interface???
_________________________
-Michael

#040103696 on a shelf
Mk2a - 90 GB - Red - Illuminated buttons

Top
#130401 - 11/12/2002 23:13 Re: picture of remote [Re: image]
mcomb
pooh-bah

Registered: 31/08/1999
Posts: 1649
Loc: San Carlos, CA
Just take a screenshot of the button guide. Alt-printscreen on win, Shift-command-4 on a mac, god only knows on XWindows.

-Mike
_________________________
EmpMenuX - ext3 filesystem - Empeg iTunes integration

Top
#130402 - 11/12/2002 23:22 Re: picture of remote [Re: mcomb]
tonyc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
god only knows on XWindows.

In typical user-friendly X-windows style, it's:


import -w root screenshot.png

.

X windows Slogans:
One thousand monkeys. One thousand MicroVAXes. One thousand years. X windows.
The environment of today... tomorrow! X windows.
Hindenburg. Titanic. Edsel. X windows.
If it works, it isn't X windows.
Incompatibility. Shoddiness. Uselessness. X windows.
To err is X windows.
X windows. Elevating brain damage to an art form.
X windows. Accept any substitute.
X windows. If it's broke, don't fix it.
X windows. If it ain't broke, fix it.
X windows. Form follows malfunction.
X windows. The Cutting Edge of Obsolescence.
X windows. The trailing edge of software technology.
X windows. Armageddon never looked so good.
X windows. Japan's secret weapon.
X windows. You'll envy the dead.
X windows. Making the world safe for competing window systems.
X windows. Let it get in YOUR way.
X windows. The problem for your problem.
X windows. If it starts working, we'll fix it. Pronto.
X windows. It could be worse, but it'll take time.
X windows. Simplicity made complex.
X windows. The greatest productivity aid since typhoid.
X windows. Flakey and built to stay that way.
X windows. Something you can be ashamed of.
X windows. 30% more entropy than the leading window system.
X windows. The first fully modular software disaster.
X windows. Rome was destroyed in a day.
X windows. Warn your friends about it.
X windows. Climbing to new depths. Sinking to new heights.
X windows. An accident that couldn't wait to happen.
X windows. Don't wait for the movie.
X windows. Never use it after a big meal.
X windows. Need we say less?
X windows. Plumbing the depths of human incompetence.
X windows. It'll make your day.
X windows. Don't get frustrated without it.
X windows. Power tools for power losers.
X windows. A software disaster of Biblical proportions.
X windows. Never had it. Never will.
X windows. The software with no visible means of support.
X windows. More than just a generation behind.
X windows. The ultimate bottleneck.
X windows. Flawed beyond belief.
X windows. The only thing you have to fear.
X windows. Somewhere between chaos and insanity.
X windows. On autopilot to oblivion.
X windows. The joke that kills.
X windows. A disgrace you can be proud of.
X windows. A mistake carried out to perfection.
X windows. Belongs more to the problem set than the solution set.
X windows. Ignorance is our most important resource.
X windows. Complex nonsolutions to simple nonproblems.
X windows. Built to fall apart.
X windows. Nullifying centuries of progress.
X windows. Falling to new depths of inefficiency.
X windows. The last thing you need.
X windows. The defacto substandard.
X windows. We will dump no core before its time.
X windows. One good crash deserves another.
X windows. A bad idea whose time has come. And gone.
X windows. We make excuses.
X windows. It didn't even look good on paper.
X windows. You laugh now, but you'll be laughing harder later!
X windows. A new concept in abuser interfaces.
X windows. How can something get so bad, so quickly?
X windows. It could happen to you.
X windows. The art of incompetence.
X windows. You have nothing to lose but your lunch.
X windows. When uselessness just isn't enough.
X windows. More than a mere hindrance. It's a whole new barrier!
X windows. When you can't afford to be right.
X windows. And you thought we couldn't make it worse.
X windows. You'd better sit down.
X windows. Don't laugh. It could be YOUR thesis project.
X windows. Why do it right when you can do it wrong?
X windows. Live the nightmare.
X windows. Our bugs run faster.
X windows. When it absolutely, positively HAS to crash overnight.
X windows. There ARE no rules.
X windows. You'll wish we were kidding.
X windows. Everything you never wanted in a window system. And more.
X windows. Dissatisfaction guaranteed.
X windows. There's got to be a better way.
X windows. The next best thing to keypunching.
X windows. Leave the thrashing to us.
X windows. We wrote the book on core dumps.
X windows. Even your dog won't like it.
X windows. More than enough rope.
X windows. Garbage at your fingertips.


Edited by yn0t_ (11/12/2002 23:36)
_________________________
- Tony C
my empeg stuff

Top
#130403 - 11/12/2002 23:49 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31583
Loc: Seattle, WA
Tell us how you really feel.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#130404 - 12/12/2002 00:13 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
mcomb
pooh-bah

Registered: 31/08/1999
Posts: 1649
Loc: San Carlos, CA
X windows Slogans:

ROFL Some of those are just beautiful.
_________________________
EmpMenuX - ext3 filesystem - Empeg iTunes integration

Top
#130405 - 12/12/2002 00:38 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
elvis
enthusiast

Registered: 18/01/2002
Posts: 270
Loc: Arizona USA
Dude, OW!
_________________________
Elvis

Top
#130406 - 12/12/2002 00:56 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
mtempsch
pooh-bah

Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
    

The X Consortium requests that the following names be used
when referring to this software:

X
X Window System
X Version 11
X Window System, Version 11
X11




/Michael
_________________________
/Michael

Top
#130407 - 12/12/2002 04:32 Re: picture of remote [Re: mtempsch]
tonyc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Tell that to the hundreds of people who wrote the fortunes...

Oh yeah, and in your profile, where it says "Linux, Paintball" don't you mean "GNU/Linux, Paintball?"


Edited by yn0t_ (12/12/2002 04:41)
_________________________
- Tony C
my empeg stuff

Top
#130408 - 12/12/2002 04:40 Re: picture of remote [Re: image]
303
enthusiast

Registered: 24/04/2002
Posts: 305
Loc: Germany
4 U





Attachments
129251-Rio_Car_Remote_RGB.jpg (111 downloads)


Top
#130409 - 12/12/2002 05:04 Re: picture of remote [Re: 303]
pgrzelak
carpal tunnel

Registered: 15/08/2000
Posts: 4859
Loc: New Jersey, USA


Wrong remote. That is the famous "stun/kill" remote.
_________________________
Paul Grzelak
200GB with 48MB RAM, Illuminated Buttons and Digital Outputs

Top
#130410 - 12/12/2002 06:58 Re: picture of remote [Re: image]
David
addict

Registered: 05/05/2000
Posts: 623
Loc: Cambridge
email me if you want the original vector artwork.

Tony - do you want to make this a download on riocar.org?

Top
#130411 - 12/12/2002 07:45 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Hmmm. I don't find import on any of my systems. It's likely to be Gnome-specific or something. The real X way is:
xwd -root | xpr > screenshot.ps
Or you can leave out the `-root' and interactively select the individual window you want to capture.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#130412 - 12/12/2002 07:53 Re: picture of remote [Re: wfaulk]
tonyc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Thanks, Bitt, your addendum shores up my indictment of "The X Window System, Version 11."
_________________________
- Tony C
my empeg stuff

Top
#130413 - 12/12/2002 08:06 Re: picture of remote [Re: image]
mrfixit
enthusiast

Registered: 14/06/2002
Posts: 337
Ok how about this one.

oops... look at the next post


Attachments
129275-rioremote.bmp (60 downloads)



Edited by mrfixit (12/12/2002 08:08)
_________________________
Ben
mk2a 60gig green/Greenlights Buttons
mk2a 60gig green/Greenlights Buttons
mk2a 40gig blue no illumination....yet
hijacked

Top
#130414 - 12/12/2002 08:08 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
frog51
pooh-bah

Registered: 09/08/2000
Posts: 2091
Loc: Edinburgh, Scotland
The implementation on Irix is just brilliant, though. SO easy to work with. Okay, there are some wonderfully esoteric flags/options, but hey...that's why we love Unix, right?
_________________________
Rory
MkIIa, blue lit buttons, memory upgrade, 1Tb in Subaru Forester STi
MkII, 240Gb in Mark Lord dock
MkII, 80Gb SSD in dock

Top
#130415 - 12/12/2002 08:08 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
It's still better than pretty much any GUI system out there, though, at least in terms of features.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#130416 - 12/12/2002 08:09 Re: picture of remote [Re: frog51]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
I always hated that red mouse cursor, though.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#130417 - 12/12/2002 08:11 Re: picture of remote [Re: image]
mrfixit
enthusiast

Registered: 14/06/2002
Posts: 337
This one, (I had uploaded the wrong file)
Darn.. its alittle sideways but it's there


Attachments
129280-rioremote.jpg (107 downloads)



Edited by mrfixit (12/12/2002 08:14)
_________________________
Ben
mk2a 60gig green/Greenlights Buttons
mk2a 60gig green/Greenlights Buttons
mk2a 40gig blue no illumination....yet
hijacked

Top
#130418 - 12/12/2002 08:22 Re: picture of remote [Re: wfaulk]
tonyc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
It's still better than pretty much any GUI system out there, though, at least in terms of features.

You're joking, right?
_________________________
- Tony C
my empeg stuff

Top
#130419 - 12/12/2002 08:26 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Show me one better.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#130420 - 12/12/2002 08:32 Re: picture of remote [Re: wfaulk]
tonyc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Well let me first backtrack and understand your "more features" argument. Mind putting a sharper point on that? I don't want to make a case only to find out you weren't saying what I thought you were.

_________________________
- Tony C
my empeg stuff

Top
#130421 - 12/12/2002 08:37 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
RobotCaleb
pooh-bah

Registered: 15/01/2002
Posts: 1866
Loc: Austin
good cover yn0t_

Top
#130422 - 12/12/2002 08:38 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
The big one for me is the ability to remotely display windows. And VNC doesn't count, as that's not really the same thing. There are a number of other things as well. Extensibility, platform agnosticism, avoidance of integration into the OS, etc.

I will freely admit that there are a huge number of problems with X, from inconsistency (Xaw, Xm, Gtk, etc.) to usability (xwd | xpr), ugliness (bitmap-only font renderers) and any number of other things. But as far as being able to actually do just about anything, nothing else comes close (except, possibly, NeWS, which I haven't used in so long, I couldn't make a reasonable comparison).
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#130423 - 12/12/2002 08:50 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
mtempsch
pooh-bah

Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
people who wrote the fortunes...

Hmmm, maybe a bug report against the fortune package.... Nah, I ain't that religious about it.

And about GNU/Linux - I'm not a disciple of Stallman. Besides, the name would get ridiculously long if every involved party was to be recognized in the name. I can like and respect them anyway...

/Michael
_________________________
/Michael

Top
#130424 - 12/12/2002 08:51 Re: picture of remote [Re: wfaulk]
tonyc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Extensibility, platform agnosticism, avoidance of integration into the OS, etc.

Hmm. I for one think GUI integration into the OS is what could actually make Linux a viable option on the desktop. Apple and Microsoft GUI's are integrated into the OS, and they work. They're simple, they do what users want.

X is a big fat pig, and it, along with the many incompatible GUI layers on top of it (some of which you've mentioned) are the main reason why *NIX will never be able to make inroads on the desktop.
_________________________
- Tony C
my empeg stuff

Top
#130425 - 12/12/2002 08:52 Re: picture of remote [Re: mtempsch]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Really! It's not like anyone's pressing AT&T/SCO/whoever owns Unix these days to call it BSD/SVR4 just because it incorporates some BSD utilities and ideas.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#130426 - 12/12/2002 08:54 Re: picture of remote [Re: wfaulk]
mtempsch
pooh-bah

Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
It's likely to be Gnome-specific or something

import is part of the imagemagick package - lots of nice converters etc.

/Michael
_________________________
/Michael

Top
#130427 - 12/12/2002 08:59 Re: picture of remote [Re: tonyc]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
I didn't know that ``making inroads on the desktop'' was what made something better.

I don't think that X is much more of a pig than MS Windows' GUI is. And I have the option of not running it.

Also, there are multiple depths of OS integration. There's MS Windows' and MacOS 9's idea, where it's pretty much one-and-the-same. There's MacOS X's, where it's the only one, but it's not 100% required to make the OS run. There's X's, where it's related to the OS no more than any hardware accessing application. And there's XFree86's, where you can have some hardware drivers in the kernel closely related to the GUI. I think that the correct approach is the middle ground where MacOS X and XFree86 are. (Not that their approaches are very similar -- convergent evolution, I suppose.)
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#130428 - 12/12/2002 09:11 Re: picture of remote [Re: wfaulk]
tonyc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
I didn't know that ``making inroads on the desktop'' was what made something better.

Seems to me they're very related. Sure, marketing is involved, but the GUI is central to the user experience, and there is NO consistency in *IX user interfaces.
_________________________
- Tony C
my empeg stuff

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >