The problem is that they clearly advertise being a Peer to Peer network built for one exact purpose. Sharing complete music albums. And their example on the front page shows not an independant artist granting redistribution rights, but instead the name of an artist who has signed with a music label. Their intent is very clear.

The one network to be shut down to date has been Napster. It also had one purpose, to share music.

I also don't appreciate the invite for anyone to get this information from you about this service using the resources of the board here. This community in general does not endorse the illegal transfer of music.

To respond to your PM, I will edit my post as well.