> I don't care whether he's saying it's positive or negative.
> I say it's bullshit, period, his basic premise is wrong.

I agree with Tony here: did this Linux SATA guy not notice they made a 510GB drive out of a 200GB one using this procedure? Clearly the procedure being used in this article needs to be debunked BIG TIME. They've f**ked with the partition map plain and simple, and created and invalid map of the drive. If he's so clever, how can he miss commenting on that?

-brendan