Quote:
I can understand the desire for better signal strength.

My router is usually placed on a wall in the exact middle of the apartment. For testing purposes, I placed the 300N on one end of the apartment, closed all doors, and went to the other end. I got a signal strength ranging from 13% to 35%, at 54Mbps (802.11G), which is the less performing but most likely scenario. This is a pretty good result compared to current WRT54G, which is usually not powerful enough to reach my laptop in similar conditions.
Considering I'll be placing the 300N in the middle of the partment too, I am hoping to get at least good signal everywhere. Possibly excellent.
It is interesting that either the three antenna system, or simply the power of them, is improving performances of 802.11G too.
I am now curious to test my 802.11N card.

However, I really think I'll switch to this 300N. What I don't know is its reliablity. WRT54G is simply rock-solid. You can stay connected for days without problems. Daily usage will tell me if the 300N is just as good.
_________________________
= Taym =
MK2a #040103216 * 100Gb *All/Colors* Radio * 3.0a11 * Hijack = taympeg