Yeah. Her penultimate point was that there have been instances where weapons with "no legitimate use" have legitimately been used for defensive situations. Her last point was that the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting, sport, or anything else along those lines, it's there to allow the people to defend themselves from an oppressive government. Which, if the amendment is to have any teeth, means that people are allowed to have weapons that serve no purpose other than to efficiently kill people, and that is a legitimate use.

Also not a gun nut, but learned to shoot in church camp.