v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200 | Programming | unofficial empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

You are not logged in. [Log In] empegbbs.com » Forums » empeg-car » Programming » v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200

Topic Options

#70565 - 12/02/2002 22:58 Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200 [Re: SE_Sport_Driver]
jnmunsey member Registered: 10/01/2002 Posts: 139 Loc: Houston, TX, USA	v2.00? Hmm, usually in most software releases, a new integer change indicates te new version is a complete revamping of the software.. Otherwise the change is a decimal or alpha change.. Is this the case with the v2.00 HiJack? Cool if true..
Top

View All Topics

Entire topic
Subject	Posted by	Posted
v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	mlord	12/02/2002 20:51
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	mlord	12/02/2002 20:51
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	loren	12/02/2002 20:53
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	cshuttle43	12/02/2002 21:03
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	tfabris	12/02/2002 21:05
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	SE_Sport_Driver	12/02/2002 21:14
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	rtundo	21/02/2002 07:57
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	rtundo	21/02/2002 08:01
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	SE_Sport_Driver	21/02/2002 08:28
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	Gary	12/02/2002 21:19
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	SE_Sport_Driver	12/02/2002 21:26
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	jnmunsey	12/02/2002 22:58
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	loren	12/02/2002 23:06
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	kimbotha	12/02/2002 23:06
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	djc	13/02/2002 13:49
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200	Gary	13/02/2002 00:08
Re: v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v200v2	adavidw	13/02/2002 11:34