Thanks for all the replies, it's good to see there's a lot of developement on this player to make it faster. I may just wait a little longer for the next jemplode release to see if anything is implemented in that release in regards to speed. From my personal test, when I do large file transfers via ethernet and emplode2b11, I get errors after about 2 Gigs, so I was hoping that jemplode w/ hijack would be more a little more stable, which it does look like so far. Thanks again.