Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#116545 - 16/09/2002 03:19 Enforcing Win 98 Login security
schofiel
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/06/1999
Posts: 2993
Loc: Wareham, Dorset, UK
If you get a Win 98 login screen, by just pressing Cancel you can bypass the login and get to the default desktop with no personalised settings.

Is there a way to nail it so that you are a) required to log on with a valid name b) unable to bypass the login?
_________________________
One of the few remaining Mk1 owners... #00015

Top
#116546 - 16/09/2002 07:20 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: schofiel]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5682
Loc: London, UK
Yes, install Windows NT4 or Windows 2000, or Windows XP. Otherwise, not as far as I know. There might be add-on programs for this, but I don't think there's a way to do it in the base OS.

_________________________
-- roger

Top
#116547 - 16/09/2002 07:45 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: schofiel]
JBjorgen
carpal tunnel

Registered: 19/01/2002
Posts: 3583
Loc: Columbus, OH
Is this a networked or standalone PC? If networked, is it a member of a windows NT or 2000 domain or is it a member of a peer-to-peer network? There are solutions to your problem more info is needed.

If you want to keep others from using a stand-alone machine, a simple startup password in the bios will usually suffice.
_________________________
~ John

Top
#116548 - 16/09/2002 09:17 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: schofiel]
Gareth
stranger

Registered: 24/10/2001
Posts: 45
Loc: Peterborough, UK
If you are in a domain, use the policy editor. See http://www.windows2000faq.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=15201

If you are standalone, use this reg hack: http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/629/

Top
#116549 - 16/09/2002 09:59 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: Gareth]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31578
Loc: Seattle, WA
If you are standalone, use this reg hack: http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/629/

Whoa, cool. I didn't know that could be done at all. I was about to post that it can't be done at all in 95/98.

Of course, you can get around it by hacking the registry in Safe Mode, so it's not particularly secure. But to prevent casual poking around, that's very cool.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#116550 - 16/09/2002 10:02 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: tfabris]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31578
Loc: Seattle, WA
If you want to keep others from using a stand-alone machine, a simple startup password in the bios will usually suffice.

Which is what I've been doing, but it's a pain to have to hit the power button, wait for it to partially boot, enter the bios password, wait for the machine to fully boot, then enter your windows password. I'd rather just hit the power button and go get something to drink, then come back to a booted windows with the password box waiting for me.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#116551 - 16/09/2002 12:22 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: JBjorgen]
schofiel
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/06/1999
Posts: 2993
Loc: Wareham, Dorset, UK
It's networked, Peer-peer. All 98 machines except on NT 4 WS (not server). There's no domain controller.
_________________________
One of the few remaining Mk1 owners... #00015

Top
#116552 - 16/09/2002 12:25 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: Roger]
schofiel
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/06/1999
Posts: 2993
Loc: Wareham, Dorset, UK
My immediate instinct also, I confess. I really wanted to bung FreeBSD onto it, but it's a company machine so I can't, unforch
_________________________
One of the few remaining Mk1 owners... #00015

Top
#116553 - 18/09/2002 02:39 Re: Enforcing Win 98 Login security [Re: Gareth]
schofiel
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/06/1999
Posts: 2993
Loc: Wareham, Dorset, UK
This one's the business, thanks very much for an excellent link (with lots of extra goodies!). I owe you one.
_________________________
One of the few remaining Mk1 owners... #00015

Top