Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#129201 - 04/12/2002 23:27 looking at jemplode's source
image
old hand

Registered: 28/04/2002
Posts: 770
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
i'm kind of lost, being that the last time i looked at java code was a very long time (freshman in college, 1998). i tried to use a text editor, but that proved unwieldy. what IDE should i get to look at this code.

quick google search reveals netbeans. is it the best choice?

Top
#129202 - 05/12/2002 01:35 Re: looking at jemplode's source [Re: image]
mcomb
pooh-bah

Registered: 31/08/1999
Posts: 1649
Loc: San Carlos, CA
In reply to:

is it the best choice?




That really depends on the person. Most of the developers I work with use the free version of Borland's JBuilder, or a glorified text editor which is named Kava I think. Personally I use a combination of Apple's Project Builder, BBEdit, and vi for coding. Last time I tried netbeans it seemed slow and overly complicated for my needs, but that was a year or more ago.

-Mike
_________________________
EmpMenuX - ext3 filesystem - Empeg iTunes integration

Top
#129203 - 05/12/2002 11:30 Re: looking at jemplode's source [Re: mcomb]
mschrag
pooh-bah

Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
Eclipse Eclipse Eclipse... It's the only way (TM). I used to try every IDE that came out and all sucked for different reasons. Since I started working on Eclipse, I haven't even looked for another. It does native rendering, so it's many times faster than JBuilder, plus it has all the core technology from VisualAge (local change history, incremental compiling, etc). CVS integration is great. It's open source. It runs on just about every platform you can imagine (while Eclipse itself is 100% Java, it uses SWT, a "replacement" for AWT that provides a lot of compelling features, thus the SWT backend must be ported to your platform-of-choice for Eclipse to run).

I recommend downloading the 2.1M3 stable release (even though it's not final, it's enough better than 2.0 that it's worth using).

Mike

Top