#231145 - 20/08/2004 13:00
Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 30/04/2000
Posts: 3810
|
Canon seems to have leapfrogged over Nikon. The new Canon 20D body is 8 megapixels, has 9 autofocus zones that work with less ambient light, and can support a 5fps frame rate (23 frame buffer with JPEG, only 6 with RAW). Perhaps more important, Canon has announced two new EF-S lenses (17-85mm with image stabilization and 10-22mm) that only work on the 20D and the D-Rebel / 300D. Up to this announcement, Nikon has had a significant lead in wide-angle lenses for D-SLRs (the DX series of lenses), but this announcement significantly helps Canon close the gap. In particular, the Nikon D70 kit includes an 18-70mm lens, and Canon now offers a lens with a wider range and image stabilization. If somebody were newly getting into digital photography and wanted to go the SLR route, a Canon 20D plus the 17-85mm lens would be a fantastic way to get started.
Now we just have to see how / when Nikon responds with a successor to the D100.
All the information is over at DPReview.com or Luminous Landscape.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231146 - 20/08/2004 15:51
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
Speaking of which..
Does anyone here want a slightly used BG-ED3 battery/grip accessory for their 10D/D60/D30 camera? My new 20D wants it's own new version of this, so..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231147 - 20/08/2004 18:44
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: mlord]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 25/08/2000
Posts: 2413
Loc: NH USA
|
You have one already? Huh?
-Zeke
_________________________
WWFSMD?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231148 - 21/08/2004 00:00
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
addict
Registered: 13/06/2000
Posts: 429
Loc: Berlin, DE
|
Mmmm.. yess.. the 20D looks very nice. Just when I was thinking about getting a D70, this thing pops up in the list.. darnit!
_________________________
80gig red mk2 -- 080000125 (No, I don't actually hate Alan Cox)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231149 - 21/08/2004 02:05
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: SuperQ]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 17/12/2000
Posts: 2665
Loc: Manteca, California
|
This buying of digital cameras is worse than buying computers! I have 3 cameras so far.
_________________________
Glenn
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231150 - 21/08/2004 09:25
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
addict
Registered: 23/12/2002
Posts: 652
Loc: Winston Salem, NC
|
Ooo, no turn on delay! [drools]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231151 - 21/08/2004 13:06
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: SuperQ]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 30/04/2000
Posts: 3810
|
Quote: Mmmm.. yess.. the 20D looks very nice. Just when I was thinking about getting a D70, this thing pops up in the list.. darnit!
Of course, they're not for sale yet, and by the time they are, there may well be some new Nikon gear on the market as well.
The thing to remember with SLR's, as opposed to point-and-shoots, is that you're not just buying a camera. You're buying a system. At this point, hardly a few months after buying my D70 with the 18-70mm kit lens, I've also bought a 105mm macro lens and a 70-300mm (f4-f5.6) zoom. I've also bought the fancy Nikon SB-800 flash. I've already got some serious friction standing between me and a jump to Canon gear, so minor feature improvements wouldn't be enough to sway me.
However, if you're starting from scratch, how do you decide which system is for you?
The benefits of Canon seem to be:
- more lenses with image stabilization (although Nikon has several good ones now)
- more lenses with ultrasonic ring motors (faster/quieter focusing)
- higher resolution sensors at the high end
- maybe a 3-6 month lead on shipping camera bodies with any given generation of sensor technology
The benefits of Nikon seem to be:
- better / more accurate auto-exposure systems (possibly a subject of debate)
- faster flash sync (probably irrelevant to many people)
- better buffering and frame rates (at a given price point)
- better wide-angle lenses, particularly for digital camera
- a wider variety of obscure / used lenses and accessories
- a possible more useful auto-ISO system than Canon
- radically better PC and Mac software
EDIT: I originally said that Canon's autofocus system is better. I've read more web sites, including Rob Galbraith's review of the 20D, and the Nikon vs. Canon autofocus quality issues seem to be unclear. Galbraith claims an advantage for Nikon that this newest Canon may or may not improve upon.
As many DP Review fanatics have pointed out, it's not really fair to compare a Nikon D70 to a Canon 20D. By all reports, the Nikon D70 kit creams the Canon 300D / D-Rebel kit, but you pay $1300 for the Nikon versus $1000 for the Canon. Nikon is rumored to be announcing a successor to the current D100 in September. One can imagine that this future Nikon will have comparable specs and prices to the Canon 20D. Of course, there's plenty of debate at the professional end (Canon 1D Mark2 vs. Nikon D2H and Canon 1Ds vs. assorted Nikon competition, including the new Fuji S3 Pro), but that's all out of the price range (and necessary feature set) of most people on this board.
One thing that's quite clear is that Nikon and Canon are frantically improving their products, and leaving the rest of the D-SLR vendors in the dust. I can't imagine why you'd want to buy the Olympus, Pentax, or Konica-Minolta D-SLRs unless you already had a big investment in those lenses.
I figure buying a camera these days is a lot like buying a PC, where there's always something better around the corner. You buy when you need one. You're buying into a whole system, not just a body, so you have to think further out.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231152 - 23/08/2004 01:04
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
Quote: The benefits of Nikon seem to be:
- better / more accurate auto-exposure systems (possibly a subject of debate)
- faster flash sync (probably irrelevant to many people)
- better buffering and frame rates (at a given price point)
- better wide-angle lenses, particularly for digital camera
- a wider variety of obscure / used lenses and accessories
- a possible more useful auto-ISO system than Canon
- radically better PC and Mac software
Err, no. The s/w is about equal between the two, and the wide-angle options are also now the same between the two. Canon's have *always* been better at high ISO, so no gain there. The buffering/frame rate of the 20D blows away *anything* from Nikon below the D2H, so no advantage there.
It's just getting more difficult for a ma&pa operation (Nikon) to keep up with the huge behemoth known as Canon. Canon has been seriously out-classing all-comers in the DSLR market for some time now, usually enjoying at least a 10-14 month lead on all models since 2000. Once in a while something like the D70 pops up to place a competitor back in the game, but then a few months later Canon reclaims the crown with a big leap product like the 20D.
Great for us purchasers, having some real competition, but Canon really dominates this segment.
EDIT: Now if only Canon could get decent metering on their sub 1-series cameras..
Cheers
Edited by mlord (23/08/2004 01:05)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231153 - 23/08/2004 13:01
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 30/04/2000
Posts: 3810
|
Quote: The s/w is about equal between the two, and the wide-angle options are also now the same between the two. Canon's have *always* been better at high ISO, so no gain there. The buffering/frame rate of the 20D blows away *anything* from Nikon below the D2H, so no advantage there.
Having using both Canon and Nikon software, it's my opinion that Nikon's software blows Canon's away. Nikon View is just far more flexible in every way than Canon ZoomBrowser, although Canon's new software may be better. These days, I mostly use Adobe Photoshop's Camera Raw, which blows both of those out of the water.
When you talk about Canon vs. Nikon parity, it's important to consider gear that's actually for sale. Canon has pre-announced the gear they'll have on sale for Christmas. Nikon will probably do its announcements next month prior to Photokina (which starts September 28). All the gear will probably be on sale at the same time. Likewise, I qualified my satements about buffering and frame rate with "at a given price point". For the ~$1000 body (Canon 300D vs. Nikon D70), Nikon blew Canon out of the water. For the ~$1500 body, the Canon 10D has some advantages over the Nikon D100, but it's unclear how the Canon 20D will stack up against the rumored forthcoming Nikon D200. At the pro end (1D Mark II vs. D2H), both cameras do an amazing 8fps, but I don't really follow those cameras too closely. Sports photographers seem to be mostly Canon users, but I've seen lots of other press shooting with Nikon.
For lenses, again, we don't know what Nikon will announce for Photokina. In recent years, Canon has had an advantage with longer lenses, but Nikon has had an advantage with wide angles and both are catching up to each other in the areas that they're weak. Canon has finally announced some new EF-S lenses, but they still lack a competitor to the Nikon 10.55mm DX fisheye. Conversely, Nikon lacks the ultrasonic motors and image stabilization that Canon has in more of its product line, although Nikon has shipped several of these sorts of lenses in the past year and may well have new ones up their sleeve.
All of this is picking nits. The high-level bit is that Nikon and Canon are far, far ahead of the rest of the D-SLR market. For some tasks, Canon is the camera of choice. For others, it's Nikon. I don't disagree that Canon is the one to beat, particularly for pro sports photography, but I also think that Nikon is very much in the game and an investment in Nikon gear is just as reasonable as an investment in Canon gear for most people's needs.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231154 - 24/08/2004 18:57
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
old hand
Registered: 14/04/2002
Posts: 1172
Loc: Hants, UK
|
Ok, I think I'm gonna spring for a new camera, a DSLR, possibly a D70.
Now my boss said he's going to New York in a couple of weeks for a shopping/sight-seeing trip of undetermined length.
Can anybody recommend a place where he could pick up a camera for me, somewhere a short distance from the tourist areas, or near somewhere that I can pursuade him to visit!?
Gareth
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231155 - 24/08/2004 19:05
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: g_attrill]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
I think Rob has suggested J&R before, which is right across from City Hall. They're also a reasonably large mail-order house, so you should be able to check for it online (they seem to be out of stock).
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231156 - 25/08/2004 01:46
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: g_attrill]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 25/08/2000
Posts: 2413
Loc: NH USA
|
B&H Photo Video (www.bhphotovideo.com) is a photographic equipment Disney World. 33rd to 34th & 9th (IIRC). Closed Saturday (you'll figure that one out the second you walk in).
-Zeke
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231157 - 25/08/2004 02:19
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
addict
Registered: 13/06/2000
Posts: 429
Loc: Berlin, DE
|
yes.. I'm starting from scratch, so it's a big decision to make.. I know 2 people with D70's and one with an older Canon D60. I like the canon for the better (atleast in the older 10D reviews) night/low light shots. the CMOS sensors seem to be better for that kind of shooting, tho people say the D70 catches up a signifigant ammount on the noise front.
Since I really won't be able to afford any until xmas anyway.. I'll wait for the reviews and comparisons to come out.
I like the price point of the 300D/D70, but I figure I should spend the extra $300 USD to get the next level up to get a higher quality body. the D70 is much better feel than the 300D, but it's not a nice solid metal feeling like some other film cams I've used.
_________________________
80gig red mk2 -- 080000125 (No, I don't actually hate Alan Cox)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231158 - 25/08/2004 13:00
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: SuperQ]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 30/04/2000
Posts: 3810
|
First, I agree with the plug for B&H Photo. I've bought lots of gear from them. If they say it's in stock, they mean it and you'll get it right away. There's always somebody with the camera for less money, but never a whole lot less. Honestly, both Nikon or Canon will make you happy. In terms of night photography, I can't speak for Canon, but here's what a D70 can do. I took this picture on July 4. These are some locals who like to blow things to bits. This guy is wearing a custom metal hat, loaded with all manner of fireworks. He's dancing around while the fireworks are shooting out of his head. (The hat has a WW1-era helmet welded into it for safety, and he's also wearing earplugs and welder's leathers.) I was about two meters away, laying on the ground and shooting as fast as I possibly could, despite the occasional embers falling on me. They didn't give me a chance to run back to my car to grab my tripod ("we're doing this now, you ready?"), so this is hand-held at 1/30 second (using the kit lens, wide open), bracing my forearm between the ground and the camera. The camera, in its own auto-ISO wisdom, decided to expose the image at ISO 640, which turned out to be a bit underexposed for the background foliage, and a bit bright for the fireworks -- probably the right compromise. Luckily, I always shoot raw, so I had plenty to work with. First, here's a draft of the image, color corrected and cranked up to 3200ASA or so using Adobe Photoshop CS: At 3200 ASA (not even officially supported by the camera but easy to do after the fact), the blue channel is pretty much useless noise in the dark bits, but there's still good signal in the highlights. I redeveloped the image at a lower speed but imported the full 16-bit data into Photoshop, where I then played lots of games with layers, channel mixers, and masks so I could work separately on the dark parts and the bright parts. Here's the result: In short, it took maybe ten minutes of work, but the end result was better than I could have ever expected. So, I ain't saying Nikon is better or worse than Canon. I'm saying that either camera could have taken this image, but to really perfect it, you've got to work it afterward. Sure, there's some noise (one-to-one pixels of the final image below), but it's quite acceptable, all things considered. The only question is whether the camera can correctly pick good exposure and focus settings, since you're potentially far too busy to worry about those things.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231159 - 10/09/2004 12:30
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: mlord]
|
new poster
Registered: 10/09/2004
Posts: 2
|
Hi,
I need a BG-ED3 grip! Do you still have it and how much would you sell it for?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231160 - 12/09/2004 00:37
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: Gene Yuger]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
I still have the whole kit here, grip included. A buddy of my has first dibs on the D60, but I don't think he'll want the grip. Make a nice offer, please!
Cheers
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231161 - 13/09/2004 11:09
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: mlord]
|
new poster
Registered: 10/09/2004
Posts: 2
|
Hi, I'd like to get one without going over $100, the reason is - I need it for a used D30 which I just bought online and don't even know how long the camera will last so investing into a brand new grip does not make much sense. To give you a clue, I can just tell you that the best price I coud find online for a used one is $130. Thanks, Gene
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231162 - 16/09/2004 22:06
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: Gene Yuger]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
Mmm.. I can ship you mine for US$120 (shipping incl).
??
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231163 - 17/09/2004 02:19
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
My 20D with 17-85mm IS lens is due here either Friday or Monday...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231164 - 17/09/2004 13:19
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: mlord]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 25/08/2000
Posts: 2413
Loc: NH USA
|
Do let us know your opinions!
-Zeke
_________________________
WWFSMD?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231165 - 03/10/2004 21:41
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: Ezekiel]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
Well, I've had the 20D for about three weeks now, and my opinion is.. too busy snapping photos to write about it! I absolutely love it!
My D60 was no slouch, and there was a huge step up in responsiveness and capabilities when I got the D60 to supplant my Nikon 990.
The difference with the 20D is every bit as big a leap in usability. That's my opinion in a nutshell. This camera never makes me wait for anything, even with a quite slow 1GB CF card for storage. It is fast, fast, fast, and that is far more important than I thought it would be before getting the 20D. Makes a massive difference for me.
More later.
Cheers
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231166 - 04/10/2004 13:19
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: mlord]
|
addict
Registered: 23/12/2002
Posts: 652
Loc: Winston Salem, NC
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231167 - 04/10/2004 16:17
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: Cybjorg]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
Of course, I couldn't buy *just* the new body.. now I have way too many nice lenses here... what to do.. what to do..
EDIT: Speaking of lenses, the new 17-85-IS is suprisingly well built. Quite solid construction, much much more so than the 28-135-IS had. It's even better built (mechanically) than my also new 70-300-DO-IS is.
So far, photos are good with both of those new lenses, though neither is going to rival my L lenses for colour/contrast. On the other hand, the two of them together are about the size of just one of my L lenses.. guess which ones I'll choose to walk around Oz with this fall..
Cheers
Edited by mlord (04/10/2004 16:22)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231168 - 18/02/2005 09:23
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5916
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
|
Canon have now done it again at the bottom end of the DSLR market.
Their new 350D / Digital Rebel XT gets all of the speed improvement of the 20D, plus 8 mega pixels and gains most of the manual controls that were removed from the 300D when compared to the 10D it was based on.
Oh and it is quite a bit smaller and 17% lighter than the 300D.
...and most importantly, it is available in black from the outset
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos350d/
and it still doesn't have a permanently visible ISO value. Why the hell not ?!
Edited by andy (18/02/2005 09:26)
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231170 - 18/02/2005 13:00
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: andy]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
Yup, the new DRebel/Kiss/350/whatevertheycalledit is one heck of a nice camera -- were I buying today, I'd get it instead of the 20D. No question. The 20D has a number of minor features over it's baby bro, including a real Prism viewfinder (as opposed to the "penta mirror"), but not enough for me to want to pay US$500-600 extra for now!
Cheers!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231171 - 18/02/2005 13:02
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
Quote: guess which ones I'll choose to walk around Oz with this fall..
Speaking of which.
Cheers
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231172 - 18/02/2005 17:56
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: andy]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 30/04/2000
Posts: 3810
|
Quote: Canon have now done it again at the bottom end of the DSLR market.
Disappointingly, Nikon hasn't announced anything new, whatsoever, in the consumer space. They're continuing to sell the perfectly good D70, but all of the rumors that they'd have a cheaper D50 and/or more expensive D90 have not come to pass. There's some new stuff at the high end, but that's not really interesting unless you're a professional photographer.
The new Canon 350D / Digital Rebel XT now has rough feature parity with the Nikon D70. Two megapixels of additional resolution is a moderate improvement, but the instant-on, the deeper buffer, and whatnot are far more important. The fact that Canon is selling it for such a cheap price is going to put a huge amount of pressure on all of their competition.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231173 - 18/02/2005 20:36
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: DWallach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5916
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
|
I was suprised to hear that Canon will not be discontinuing the 300D/Digital Rebel, they are going to keep it as the bottom of the range model.
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#231174 - 19/02/2005 01:21
Re: Cool new Canon D-SLR and lenses
[Re: andy]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14491
Loc: Canada
|
That's just marketing-speak for "we can't say it's being discontinued until stock levels finally ease off, as otherwise we'd be stuck with tons of stock as dealers await firesale pricing on it all".
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|