Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#271414 - 06/12/2005 19:09 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: bonzi]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
The reason that the US automakers sell a lot of bad cars is that they're cheap. They're making virtually no profit on them, as evidenced by their recent "anyone can buy at employee prices" promotions that have been going on for what seems to be a year or so.

Pickup trucks are really the only hauling vehicles that you can find at a normal dealership. The type of vans that you are talking about basically don't exist here and the sort that do don't generally seem to be available at consumer dealerships.

What he meant is that he wanted an inexpensive 200hp AWD. I hear it's different in Europe, but, in the US, European makes are almost exclusively in the "luxury" category, with VW being an exception, but even they are trying to go that way, starting with their prices. Given the fact that US automakers are ignoring large parts of the auto consumer market, namely people who actually like cars (they basically sell Trucks/SUVs, econoboxes, and land yachts, with a few exceptions), that probably was his only choice.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#271415 - 06/12/2005 19:22 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: bonzi]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Quote:
Audi quatro, Merc 4Matic, Passat what's-it-called-this-week...? Aren't they available across the pond?

Available, but all more expensive (especially the Merc). Volvos are the other choice, but they are also quite expensive for the fast 4wd ones. I bought a Subaru over a Passat wagon for the price - and I liked the drive of the Soobie better anyway.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#271416 - 06/12/2005 19:54 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: cushman]
petteri
addict

Registered: 02/08/2004
Posts: 434
Loc: Helsinki, Finland
One of the things I've noticed about the cars sold in the European market compared to the US is at the lower end of the market. It seems that small does not always equal cheap in Europe. It's hard to find a 'nice' small car here in the USA. The MINI is sold here of course but that's about it. No SMART, even Honda and Toyota have different low end models here. The European makes (the ones that operate in this martket) for the most part don't offer the smaller models for sale here at all. Its a shame.

Top
#271417 - 06/12/2005 20:16 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: cushman]
bonzi
pooh-bah

Registered: 13/09/1999
Posts: 2401
Loc: Croatia
Quote:
Available, but all more expensive (especially the Merc). Volvos are the other choice, but they are also quite expensive for the fast 4wd ones. I bought a Subaru over a Passat wagon for the price - and I liked the drive of the Soobie better anyway.

I see. Interesting, 225HP WRX is here only about 10% cheaper than 200HP Volvo XC70 (which I prefer to almost-SUV XC90); 275HP Passat 4Motion is almost 25% dearer than WRX. Anyway, I could stand any one of them (for out-of-town driving, anyway)...
_________________________
Dragi "Bonzi" Raos Q#5196 MkII #080000376, 18GB green MkIIa #040103247, 60GB blue

Top
#271418 - 06/12/2005 20:31 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: wfaulk]
TigerJimmy
old hand

Registered: 15/02/2002
Posts: 1049
Quote:
Pickup trucks are really the only hauling vehicles that you can find at a normal dealership. The type of vans that you are talking about basically don't exist here and the sort that do don't generally seem to be available at consumer dealerships.


The Mercedes Sprinter (joint partnership with Freightliner) is being sold in the US, and is also sold as a Dodge Sprinter. I drove one of these (the Mercedes version), and it is an amazing utility vehicle. If I needed to haul stuff, I would definitely get one of these as a work truck before a pickup. It has an incredibly tight turning circle, too; it feels like you are moving sideways in the driver's seat when turning around. The thing gets 25mpg on top of it all, due to the fantastic Mercedes diesel.

Top
#271419 - 06/12/2005 21:00 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: TigerJimmy]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
I thought I was seeing an odd number of those around recently. That is absolutely the first van of that type I've seen at a consumer dealership in ages. Besides that, it's pretty much the Chevy and Ford E-Series vans, which, as far as I can tell, haven't really been updated since 1973.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#271420 - 06/12/2005 21:05 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: TigerJimmy]
Robotic
pooh-bah

Registered: 06/04/2005
Posts: 2026
Loc: Seattle transplant
The Mercedes Sprinter is incredible to behold, but I must wonder (without doing *any* research) what the price is compared to a simple Ford E350 cargo van.
-Price comparison only-
I understand the differences in size, engine availability, quality, etc.
Vans like the Sprinter have been availalble in Europe forever, it seems. The closest thing you could find in the states is, well, maybe a UPS truck.
_________________________
10101311 (20GB- backup empeg)
10101466 (2x60GB, Eutronix/GreenLights Blue) (Stolen!)

Top
#271421 - 06/12/2005 21:20 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: Robotic]
robricc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Vans like the Sprinter have been availalble in Europe forever, it seems. The closest thing you could find in the states is, well, maybe a UPS truck.

If you say so....
Freightliner
Dodge
_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736

Top
#271422 - 06/12/2005 21:32 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: Robotic]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Looks like the E350 starts at $$27,815 and the Sprinter starts at $29,585. The E150 starts at $25,375
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#271423 - 06/12/2005 21:47 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: robricc]
Robotic
pooh-bah

Registered: 06/04/2005
Posts: 2026
Loc: Seattle transplant
Quote:
If you say so....

...before the introduction of the Sprinter here in the US, that is. Of course I read the posts earlier in the thread. Yes, I've seen a couple on the road.
Thrilled that it's here- also yes.
In the market for a good van- yes again.
Got $30k to drop on a vehicle of *any* type- not just now, sorry.

Nice links, though. Thanks for that! And thanks Bitt for the Ford prices, too!
_________________________
10101311 (20GB- backup empeg)
10101466 (2x60GB, Eutronix/GreenLights Blue) (Stolen!)

Top
#271424 - 06/12/2005 22:38 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: wfaulk]
rob
carpal tunnel

Registered: 21/05/1999
Posts: 5335
Loc: Cambridge UK
Quote:
Brits complaining about the US's lousy auto industry is quite a bit like, well, Brits complaining about the US's lousy space program.

I'm not sure I agree. Not having a mass market auto industry of our own would seem to eliminate national bias from the decision making process. Most Brits would recommend German or Japanese cars. From what I've seen driving around in the US, it seems most Americans agree!

However, the UK still makes the best taxi cabs in the world

Rob

Top
#271425 - 07/12/2005 00:40 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: frog51]
tanstaafl.
carpal tunnel

Registered: 08/07/1999
Posts: 5543
Loc: Ajijic, Mexico
while the Vette is a shockingly poor handling, brash, annoying thing

Show me the BMW (any BMW, regardless of model series) that will stay with a Z06 Corvette on any road or race course, and I'll be impressed.

The 'Vette will out-accelerate, out-brake, out-corner the M3, and cost less to buy and maintain while doing it.

There is no car selling for under $150,000 that will run with it. It will approach 30 MPG in highway driving. It is arguably the equal of Porsches and Ferraris that sell for two and three times the price.

No, I am not a Corvette owner, I don't even particularly like them -- but the new C6 series 'Vette is one hell of a car.

tanstaafl.
_________________________
"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch"

Top
#271426 - 07/12/2005 05:42 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: bonzi]
andy
carpal tunnel

Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5914
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
Quote:

I see. Interesting, 225HP WRX is here only about 10% cheaper than 200HP Volvo XC70 (which I prefer to almost-SUV XC90); 275HP Passat 4Motion is almost 25% dearer than WRX. Anyway, I could stand any one of them (for out-of-town driving, anyway)...


I don't really see how the XC70 is comparable to the WRX. It is 200kg heavier, which would explain why it is 3.5 seconds slower to sixty.
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday

Top
#271427 - 07/12/2005 06:00 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: tanstaafl.]
TigerJimmy
old hand

Registered: 15/02/2002
Posts: 1049
The new Z06 is a world-class car, no doubt. It is the rare exception to the rule that US cars suck.

Jim

Top
#271428 - 07/12/2005 06:01 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: tanstaafl.]
andy
carpal tunnel

Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5914
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
Quote:

The 'Vette will out-accelerate, out-brake, out-corner the M3, and cost less to buy and maintain while doing it.

There is no car selling for under $150,000 that will run with it. It will approach 30 MPG in highway driving. It is arguably the equal of Porsches and Ferraris that sell for two and three times the price.

No, I am not a Corvette owner, I don't even particularly like them -- but the new C6 series 'Vette is one hell of a car.



Every UK car reviewer (including the ones I trust) disagrees with you. It isn't a US/UK bias that causes this either, for example the excellent Evo magazine had their car of the year feature this month.

The placed the Corvette 12th out of 13, with the Roush Mustang at joint 3rd.

From the various reviews that I have read the conclusions seems to be that it is powerful, fast and desirable, but that it hates bumpy roads. To quote from Evo:

"...this is a seriously quick car..."

"...on smooth roads it'll maintain this thrilling pace, the steering meaty and direct, body control good and traction out of corners excellent..."

"You can sense a 'but' coming along soon, can't you? The C6's problem is that it doesn't like bumps. It's not too keen on sharp crests. And if you throw a less than ideal camber into the mix, it all turns rather ugly. First it gets agitated, then it starts to skip across the road..."

"Its composure is just too easily upset. It may well have double wishbone suspension at all four corners, but if you had to guess you'd say it was the Corvette rather than the Roush Mustang that had the live rear axle."

"All of that said, the C6 still has a hell of a lot going for it. Just think of it as a smooth-roar super-fast GT rather than a sports car and you'll not be disappointed."

P.S. all the UK reviewers seem to argee however that the latest Corvette is vastly improved over previous ones
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday

Top
#271429 - 07/12/2005 07:06 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: SE_Sport_Driver]
thinfourth2
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 13/04/2001
Posts: 1742
Loc: The land of the pale blue peop...
Quote:

Are you guys getting the 84 Vette over there??? The new Z06 is going head to head with Ferraris in publications here, with instrumented tests, and is in the same leage (not to mention the 1/3 cost). You can drive the thing in the winter and people can actually afford to race the things.

Kind of reminds me of how the Lotus Eclipse was legendary for being the best handleing car in the world. Until some magazines actually started hooking instrumentation upto it and found this wasn't the case at all.



Don't get handling and grip confused this is one of the reasons that the vette over here stinks and in the USA it rules.

American magazines with an obsession with figures straps a G-meter to a car and then goes round and round in circles on beautifully flat smooth piece of tarmac till it unsticks. This then gives them their G reading. The car might be understeering like a pig but it might still give a high reading.

In europe they get a car and throw it down a road and from there asses its handling.

Now in the EVO test that was mentioned earlier a small front wheel drive hatch beat a load of established supercars not because it gets better figures but because it drives better and is more fun.

Handling is not something that can be measured and quantized it can only be felt. its not how much G a car can produce its how the car feedback whether the steering lets you know what is happening, how it reacts to inputs, what happens when you lit off can it slide and is it predictable.

My caterham is brilliant in this aspect it gives huge amounts of feedback and it is completely adjustable. You want to go through a corner with understeer it will do that, you want neutral it will do that, you want to go completely sideways it will do that too. By adjustable i mean not that you can change the suspension settings but by playing with weight transfer you can adjust the attitude of the car in corners. You trail brake into a corner and you can drift the car sideways through an entire bend. I don't do this on the road as you would be going just too damn fast.

America car industry is learning about ride and handling and are starting to bring cars over to europe to get them set-up. While the uk might not have a car industry to talk of in the same way as USA does. The uk does however still live on the cutting edge of automotive technology a large amount of cars are developed in the UK.

Also don't forget the good old indy car circuit, just how many of those cars are built in the UK?
_________________________
P.Allison fixer of big engines Mk2+Mk2a signed by God / Hacked by the Lord Aberdeen Scotland

Top
#271430 - 07/12/2005 07:37 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: tanstaafl.]
thinfourth2
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 13/04/2001
Posts: 1742
Loc: The land of the pale blue peop...
Quote:
Show me the BMW (any BMW, regardless of model series) that will stay with a Z06 Corvette on any road or race course, and I'll be impressed.



okay lets be impressed then

Nurburgring in germany

corvette C6 is 8:15

BMW M3 CSL 7:50
BMW M6 8:06
BMW M5 8:13

Now i could not find a laptime for a production Z06 but a prototype based on the Z06 did it in 7:40 but it is in no way is it a Z06 http://www.autocar.co.uk/news_article.asp?na_id=216013

Now if you want to talk cheap speed then radical have done it in 6:55http://www.radicalextremesportscars.com/news_folder/nord0905/index.php and that is under $150,000 and road legal.
_________________________
P.Allison fixer of big engines Mk2+Mk2a signed by God / Hacked by the Lord Aberdeen Scotland

Top
#271431 - 07/12/2005 08:05 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: thinfourth2]
sein
old hand

Registered: 07/01/2005
Posts: 893
Loc: Sector ZZ9pZa
Quote:
okay lets be impressed then

Nurburgring in germany

corvette C6 is 8:15

BMW M3 CSL 7:50
BMW M6 8:06
BMW M5 8:13



According to this thread, the "official" time for a Z06 is 7.42.99. How standard that car is, I don't know. Pretty damn fast though!
_________________________
Hussein

Top
#271432 - 07/12/2005 08:27 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: sein]
sein
old hand

Registered: 07/01/2005
Posts: 893
Loc: Sector ZZ9pZa
Quote:
According to this thread...


Oh, a conversation here has someone pointing out that the blue Z06 on the 'ring had a supercharger and ~600bhp.

Its obviously not quite easy to get numbers for these things from the salty world of the Internet.
_________________________
Hussein

Top
#271433 - 07/12/2005 10:46 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: TigerJimmy]
SE_Sport_Driver
carpal tunnel

Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
Quote:
If I needed to haul stuff, I would definitely get one of these as a work truck before a pickup. It has an incredibly tight turning circle, too; it feels like you are moving sideways in the driver's seat when turning around. The thing gets 25mpg on top of it all, due to the fantastic Mercedes diesel.


I don't just haul stuff, I haul a LOT of stuff. And I need an open top to do it. I have forklifts drop cubes of masonry block, ceramic tile, scaffolding, etc into my bed. I need an open top to do that.

Those vans seem like they'd be perfect for our plumbers, electricans and the like. As far back as 1992, I remember seeing Ford drive these vans around (I could have sworn they had Escort in the title even though they were not Escorts). Ford brings over a ton of cool toys to play with including some from Australia and Cosworth Escorts. But I'm not sure why. They never bother to offer them to us. That may be changin with the new Dodge Sprinter however. The one I see driving around is from a dealership and has "I'm a Dodge Sprinter" painted on it in 12" tall letters.

I wonder if they're offered in AWD. Many of the construction sites are so muddy that you need 4x4 to not get stuck.
_________________________
Brad B.

Top
#271434 - 07/12/2005 11:24 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: andy]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14484
Loc: Canada
Quote:
The placed the Corvette 12th out of 13, with the Roush Mustang at joint 3rd.


Or, if you like, 12th among all production car models on the planet.

Top
#271435 - 07/12/2005 11:28 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: mlord]
andy
carpal tunnel

Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5914
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
Quote:

Or, if you like, 12th among all production car models on the planet.


Maybe, but they didn't test all the production cars on the planet, just 13 of them...

_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday

Top
#271436 - 07/12/2005 14:17 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: thinfourth2]
g_attrill
old hand

Registered: 14/04/2002
Posts: 1172
Loc: Hants, UK
They recently reviewed the standard C6 and the M5 on Top Gear - the M5 was 1:26.2 around the test track, the C6 1:26.8, I expect the Z06 would be quite a bit faster.

M5 review:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5363968757069908445

C6 review:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1218157444012227484

Gareth

Top
#271437 - 07/12/2005 14:40 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: g_attrill]
andy
carpal tunnel

Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5914
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
The standard M3 was 1:31.8 (dry), the M3 CSL (in the wet) was 1:28.0

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8679415418600912857&q=top+gear+m3

The Top Gear track of course is nice and smooth, not a bump in sight.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/powerlaps/
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday

Top
#271438 - 07/12/2005 15:02 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: g_attrill]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14484
Loc: Canada
Anyone out there know of a way to save these videos to disk for playback when I'm elsewhere, away from my internet connection?

Top
#271439 - 07/12/2005 16:46 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: mlord]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
IIRC, mplayer has an output option that will let you write it to a file instead of displaying it. That's hearsay, though.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#271440 - 07/12/2005 17:18 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: rob]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Of course you're right, but there is a distinct anti-American tone to the article that seems, well, unnecessary. And not just anti-American-car, which is certainly well-deserved of late.

I'm honestly still not sure who buys these American cars. Trucks I can understand, and some of the conpact cars I can understand. And there are a few cars or imprints here and there that are at least interesting on some level, like the Corvette, the Mustang, the Buick line, and a good number of Dodge/Chrysler cars. But I just don't understand who's buying any Pontiac or non-compact Chevy or Ford.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#271441 - 07/12/2005 17:30 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: wfaulk]
rob
carpal tunnel

Registered: 21/05/1999
Posts: 5335
Loc: Cambridge UK
Quote:
Of course you're right, but there is a distinct anti-American tone to the article that seems, well, unnecessary.

It's just a bit of tongue in cheek racism - most automotive hacks write like that. It's nothing personal. The most outspoken American-car-hating journalist in the world bought a GT40 - twice! (The second time after regretting sending it back following a few break downs).

Rob

Top
#271442 - 07/12/2005 18:27 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: wfaulk]
boxer
pooh-bah

Registered: 16/04/2002
Posts: 2011
Loc: Yorkshire UK
Come on, now, I seem to remember sitting in Palm Beach, the night of the milennium celebrations and every time London's fireworks came on, we were treated to a load of "Once Great Nation" and "former colonialists" stuff, so much that my brother-in-law turned off the television and changed the subject to avoid more embarrassment.

Pot, kettle, black!

But I'll never be an Inde. reader, I don't like the self righteous pitch that they take on a whole load of issues, apart from motoring.

Incidentally, we had the first 4x4 in a ditch here in North Yorkshire, today: Woman taking two kids to school who thought it was invincible. 4x4 is the same as any other car on sheet ice, possibly worse, unless it's got very clever traction control.
_________________________
Politics and Ideology: Not my bag

Top
#271443 - 07/12/2005 18:31 Re: Are most British car reviews this pompous? [Re: boxer]
drakino
carpal tunnel

Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
Quote:
4x4 is the same as any other car on sheet ice, possibly worse, unless it's got very clever traction control.


Very true. Doesn't help much when all 4 wheels are spinning the same. Having a proper traction control system in my car I got in 2000 has made a big difference in the snow and ice. I won't buy a car without it again for winter driving.

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >