Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#325737 - 06/09/2009 23:06 Linux install question?
gbeer
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/12/2000
Posts: 2665
Loc: Manteca, California
Are there any linux images available that can be copied to a hard drive, creating something like the restore partition that so many pc vendors are doing these days?

Reason for the question is that I have a Sony PCG-SR33k laptop that can only be booted from the installed hard drive. It used to be bootable via a pcmcia connected cd player, except that the pcmcia slot was destroyed, eliminating that option.
_________________________
Glenn

Top
#325739 - 06/09/2009 23:42 Re: Linux install question? [Re: gbeer]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14478
Loc: Canada
Yes.

But instead, just yank the hard drive, use another (faster!) PC to do the install, and then put it back again.

Cheers

Top
#325740 - 07/09/2009 00:53 Re: Linux install question? [Re: mlord]
gbeer
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/12/2000
Posts: 2665
Loc: Manteca, California
But would not the install be configured to run on the computer where the install was done?

The sony is intel Mobile Celeron, while the desktop is a 2 core AMD x64?
_________________________
Glenn

Top
#325741 - 07/09/2009 01:21 Re: Linux install question? [Re: gbeer]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14478
Loc: Canada
Originally Posted By: gbeer
But would not the install be configured to run on the computer where the install was done?

Dunno about the other distros, but we use Ubuntu exclusively here now. And it is plug and play.

Move a disk to a new system? No problem. smile

One of my standard tools now is a bootable Ubuntu USB stick. It works on any system I've tried it in yet. This is not the typical USB-installer, but rather a full-blown Ubuntu system installed on a USB stick. There's a difference.

Cheers


Edited by mlord (07/09/2009 01:23)

Top
#325744 - 07/09/2009 03:16 Re: Linux install question? [Re: mlord]
gbeer
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/12/2000
Posts: 2665
Loc: Manteca, California
That's what I needed to hear. Thanks much! smile
_________________________
Glenn

Top
#325746 - 07/09/2009 12:46 Re: Linux install question? [Re: gbeer]
tman
carpal tunnel

Registered: 24/12/2001
Posts: 5528
Unless you've got weird hardware, the generic kernel in most Linux distributions will be able to handle it. It isn't like Windows which has a meltdown if you change anything.

Top
#325771 - 08/09/2009 15:48 Re: Linux install question? [Re: gbeer]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31566
Loc: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted By: gbeer
But would not the install be configured to run on the computer where the install was done?


Yeah, that's Windows you're thinking of there. smile
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#325779 - 08/09/2009 16:41 Re: Linux install question? [Re: tfabris]
peter
carpal tunnel

Registered: 13/07/2000
Posts: 4172
Loc: Cambridge, England
Originally Posted By: tfabris
Yeah, that's Windows you're thinking of there. smile

It's a shame that Windows has gone backwards in this regard. I remember pulling this trick on Windows 95 and on boot it came up with a series of dialog boxes starting with "Windows has detected new hardware: Motherboard" and carried on fine from there.

Peter

Top
#325793 - 09/09/2009 00:17 Re: Linux install question? [Re: tfabris]
gbeer
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/12/2000
Posts: 2665
Loc: Manteca, California
Originally Posted By: tfabris
Originally Posted By: gbeer
But would not the install be configured to run on the computer where the install was done?


Yeah, that's Windows you're thinking of there. smile


Am I wrong it remembering that older versions of linux were not this friendly?
_________________________
Glenn

Top
#325801 - 09/09/2009 06:43 Re: Linux install question? [Re: gbeer]
andy
carpal tunnel

Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5914
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
Originally Posted By: gbeer
Originally Posted By: tfabris
Originally Posted By: gbeer
But would not the install be configured to run on the computer where the install was done?


Yeah, that's Windows you're thinking of there. smile


Am I wrong it remembering that older versions of linux were not this friendly?

I'm still running an old RedHat 7.1 box and that is less friendly. However it can still be moved to other hardware, you just have to manually run the hardware detection tool after booting from a CD (of from the hard disk if you get lucky and it will boot that far).
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday

Top
#325804 - 09/09/2009 09:53 Re: Linux install question? [Re: gbeer]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14478
Loc: Canada
Originally Posted By: gbeer
Am I wrong it remembering that older versions of linux were not this friendly?

Yes. Redhat in particular set Linux back many years with its pathetic half-attempts at a desktop.

Thank goodness somebody else showed up to do it right.

The odd thing is, Redhat and everyone else use exactly the same software. They just misconfigure the hell out of things by default. Ubuntu is no saint, but they get most of it right.

Cheers

Top
#325807 - 09/09/2009 10:53 Re: Linux install question? [Re: mlord]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Ooh! Another Redhat hater!
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#325818 - 09/09/2009 16:55 Re: Linux install question? [Re: wfaulk]
canuckInOR
carpal tunnel

Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
Originally Posted By: wfaulk
Ooh! Another Redhat hater!

Another here, too. :-p

Top
#325837 - 09/09/2009 19:06 Re: Linux install question? [Re: canuckInOR]
ricin
veteran

Registered: 19/06/2000
Posts: 1495
Loc: US: CA
redhat--
_________________________
Donato
MkII/080000565
MkIIa/010101253
ricin.us

Top
#325848 - 09/09/2009 21:00 Re: Linux install question? [Re: ricin]
JBjorgen
carpal tunnel

Registered: 19/01/2002
Posts: 3582
Loc: Columbus, OH
Redhat is the only distro I've ever administrated on servers in 10+ years of working with Linux (since RH3). I'm so used to it, I don't really know what I'm missing I guess.

I've used Ubuntu, Debian, and other distros at various times but only for hobby stuff.

I will agree though, that I would never run the GUI on redhat because it's so awful.
_________________________
~ John

Top
#325852 - 09/09/2009 23:00 Re: Linux install question? [Re: tfabris]
Taym
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/06/2001
Posts: 2504
Loc: Roma, Italy
Originally Posted By: tfabris
Originally Posted By: gbeer
But would not the install be configured to run on the computer where the install was done?


Yeah, that's Windows you're thinking of there. smile

I've moved Vista 64 to different hardware by simply booting in safe mode and having the OS re-detect all changes. And, I've done the same with Windows 7 64bits. Not just "plug and play" by definition, but not a problem either. Was I just luky?
And actually I've been doing stuff like this since Windows 2000, as I usually never reinstall windows for years, until I upgrade to a new OS; so when I get a newer machine every 1 or 2 years, I always try to avoid reinstallations as well.

I actually remembered having one problem once with a ACPI disk based installation moved to a non-ACPI older machine, but I found an easy workaround on line which consisted in having to change the disk configuration on the old machine before the move. Of course, that was not plug and play at all.


Edited by taym (09/09/2009 23:04)
_________________________
= Taym =
MK2a #040103216 * 100Gb *All/Colors* Radio * 3.0a11 * Hijack = taympeg

Top
#325861 - 10/09/2009 04:29 Re: Linux install question? [Re: Taym]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5680
Loc: London, UK
Originally Posted By: taym
I've moved Vista 64 to different hardware by simply booting in safe mode and having the OS re-detect all changes.


Older versions of Windows used different HALs for ACPI/non-ACPI, UP/MP. This is (AFAICT) no longer the case. Where you're likely to run into problems is with mass-storage controllers. Other than that, it'll probably just work.

It's all moot for me anyway, because all of the PCs I care about are virtual, so I can migrate those to new hardware trivially.

Edit: Oh, and although I've not used RedHat for many years, the hate's never left me...


Edited by Roger (10/09/2009 04:30)
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#325865 - 10/09/2009 10:00 Re: Linux install question? [Re: Roger]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14478
Loc: Canada
Originally Posted By: Roger
Where you're likely to run into problems is with mass-storage controllers.

.. and licensing.

Top
#325874 - 10/09/2009 12:19 Re: Linux install question? [Re: mlord]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5680
Loc: London, UK
Originally Posted By: mlord
Originally Posted By: Roger
Where you're likely to run into problems is with mass-storage controllers.

.. and licensing.


That's a problem on OEM-licensed copies of Windows (as, arguably, it should be). For retail, just reactivate it. If you have to call the number (and you probably won't), they're usually OK with "machine died, moved the disk to a new one".
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#325875 - 10/09/2009 12:31 Re: Linux install question? [Re: Roger]
tman
carpal tunnel

Registered: 24/12/2001
Posts: 5528
Originally Posted By: Roger
For retail, just reactivate it. If you have to call the number (and you probably won't), they're usually OK with "machine died, moved the disk to a new one".

Yeah. I've called them several times and they've been okay each time. Just tell them that you changed some component and need to reactivate. The only hassle is reading out and then typing in a long number.

Top