In order that I start ripping MP3's now in preparation which CD -> MP3 Ripper would you guys recommend ?

Must be free and run on Win 2000 and NT.

Cheers

LTJ

Exact Audio Copy + lame

Peter

This is one of the few items I've actually spent money when it comes to software, so I'll immediately ignore the freeware requirement and
recommend AudioGrabber with the Lame encoder
See this url

/Michael

What do you guys think of Audio Catalyst? If any of you like it, what settings would he/she recommend?

Thanx :)

Taym
_________________________
MK II BLUE/RED 12GB #923

I used to be using Audio Catalyst. Best settings are probably a matter of taste, I usually use variable bitrate and set it to a max bitrate of 192kbs.

However, I have been told numerous times that LAME would be much better in terms of sound quality than Xing's encoder, even though Xing is much faster.

I cannot hear a big difference with my simple ears, but I didn't really compare seriously yet.

Till

I use the comercial software Easy CD-DA Extractor from Poikosoft also with Lame 3.89 decoder!


CrazyMelki

I just use Audiocatalyst. It doesn't require any thought, which is good for me

Try a few programs and see what you like. I like the speed and usability of AC, but the majority of people here are much more picky about the quality of their MP3's. For me, fast and easy AC is the way to go.

DiGNAN
Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da, etc.

I like MusicMatch Jukebox. It's got quite a nice tag editor now as well. See www.musicmatch.com

Andy

26GB MKII Blue #090000727

Personally I have been VERY happy with MusicMatch Jukebox. The encoder is good (I use 76%VBR), it keeps our quite extensive music collection in order, and searchable. Basically, it's almost everything you could want for dealing with your mp3's all in one program.
Now if only there was some nifty interface between it and the empeg...

Hi.

Take a look at http://www.incase.de/lame-xing-compare/ for a (now rather old) compare between Xing (AudioCatalyst) and lame encoding quality.

cu,
sven

proud MkII owner (12GB blue/green/smoked, #080000113)

Audiograbber & Lame have been what I was using. A LONG time back I purchased Audiograbber. I switched to Audiocatalyst when it was released. The Xing encoder really leaves some pretty bad artifacts in the MP3s. Also, the Lame encoder has nearly caught up with Xing speed-wise... without significant artifacts. The Audiocatalyst code development has stopped, so they will never add new features.... so forget about things like ID3v2 tags.

Audiograbber, however, is still being actively worked on. It is a rock solid application that I have used for years. I'd gladly pay much more than $20 (recently lowered from $25) for this app. The CD audio ripping engine has also come a long way since audiocatalyst. I NEVER get any errors ripping around 24x most of the time.

Buy audiograbber & download LAME!

-Jeremy

Mk2/40GB/Blue

I have been told numerous times that LAME would be much better in terms of sound quality than Xing's encoder, even though Xing is much faster. I cannot hear a big difference with my simple ears, but I didn't really compare seriously yet.

Me too. I can't hear a difference between the Xing encoder at a high VBR rate and LAME at a similar rate. Nonetheless, I've been using LAME lately as everyone keeps slamming Xing. Bowing to peer pressure, I suppose.

___________
Tony Fabris

I think using musicmatch breaks ff/rw on the empeg though. :-(

Sean

I use audiograbber and lame, but if it must be free, then I think your best option would be EAC and lame. EAC takes some configuring to get things set up right, but there are some excellent step by step directions for this. EAC uses secure ripping, so its great for scratched cds. There are a bunch of lame command lines around, so if you need one, let me know. If you decide to use lame, try to use the command line exe rather than the dll, because the dll hasn't changed much since 3.87.

Sean

With a Plexwriter comes Plextools, at least here in Europe. It will rip your CD's to WAV excellently, as to be expected of Plextor. Then again, you could add the LAME dll to it and end up with MP3's! WMA is supported also.
I actually use Feurio! Professional since it also has nice database functionality for organizing your audio CDs. Of course, with some help of the LAME dll out come the MP3s.

Edwin de Vaan
mk2 rev.7 # 080000263 (queue 1232) 6+20Gb blue/red

I think using musicmatch breaks ff/rw on the empeg though. :-(

No, using Variable Bit Rate encoding is what breaks FF/RW. It's not Musicmatch's fault, it's the empeg's fault. This bug will be fixed on the empeg with the next software release.

Variable Bit Rate encoding is a good thing, don't let the FF/RW bug scare you away from VBR.

___________
Tony Fabris

You are right, I got things mixed up. Most of my lame encoded vbr files work fine. Heres a quote from the release notes.

"It appears that Audio Catalyst will produce files with incorrect VBR
headers if Real Player 7 is also installed. It is not possible to fast
forward or rewind such files, the time display will not update and the
player will not remember where it was in the track if powered
off. Apparently the latest version of MP3 Tag Studio can repair these files
although we have not tested it."

Sean

Oh, I see. You were referring to a different issue where the files are actually corrupted. Sorry, I forgot about that one.

Even if the files are correctly encoded and fixed, the empeg currently has trouble doing FF/RW in VBR files. This will be taken care of with version 2.0 software.

___________
Tony Fabris

I have to put my vote in for EAC + Lame. I've been using them for about a year now. I _CAN_ hear a difference between Lame and Xing... Or at least I think I can Maybe that's why it's called psycho-acoustics?

-Trevor

-----
Mk 2, Green 12GB 080000349

In reply to:

---

There are a bunch of lame command lines around, so if you need one, let me know. If you decide to use lame, try to use the command line exe rather than the dll, because the dll hasn't changed much since 3.87.

---

I'd be interested in some of those lame command lines. I just switched to using the dll last week instead of the exe for the simple reason that whatever way I had the exe configured, it was taking about 30-35 minutes to encode a ripped .wav file compared with the dll ripping and encoding at between 0.5x - 0.7x (about 5 minutes for a 3.5min track)

(I'm using EAC 0.9 prebeta 11 and lame 3.89 MMX, encoding to 192k VBR)

Geoff
---- -------
Got one of the first Mark 2 empegs...

I'd be interested in some of those lame command lines. I just switched to using the dll last week instead of the exe for the simple reason that whatever way I had the exe configured, it was taking about 30-35 minutes to encode a ripped .wav file compared with the dll ripping and encoding at between 0.5x - 0.7x (about 5 minutes for a 3.5min track)


From abcde (linux using cdparanoia and lame) I use the following command arguments:

-m a -q 2 -h -v -V 2 -b 96 -k --add-id3v2

There is a bit of redundancy in the arguments, but it works very well for me. Basically, I'm setting it to (in order)

Automatically decide stereo format (joint or separate)
quality 2 (1-10 scale, 1 being absolute best)
High quality switch (Vbr automatically turns this on I think)
vbr mode
VBR quality of compression (1-10 scale, 1 being bigger files, 10 being crappy sound)
Minimum bitrate of 96kbs
kill the high-pass filter
force writing id3v2 tags (lame will write v1 tags by default only)

I used to use -mj -h -q2 -V1 -b96 -B320, but have recently switched to --r3mix -b96 --add-id3v2. From www.r3mix.net: "--r3mix -b112" is synonym for "-V1 -mj -h --athtype 3 --lowpass 19.5 -b112"

I changed to -b96, just to stick with my previous minimum bitrate.

I highly recommend this site for a good read on MP3 encoding.

-Trevor

-----
Mk 2, Green 12GB 080000349

Hi.

My lame commandline option is configured as follows within EAC:
-v -h %h-V 0 -q 2%h%l-V 4 -q 5%l -ms -b 128 -B %r %c-p%c %s %d
All that % stuff is for using the switches EAC provides to configure the encoder. With my current settings, the above commandline equals to:
-v -h -V 0 -q 2 -ms -b 128 -B 320

cu,
sven

proud MkII owner (12GB blue/green/smoked, #080000113)

Damn, I guess that rules out my first choice.. ripit.pl :)

12gig red mk2 -- 080000125

In reply to:

---

There is a bit of redundancy in the arguments, but it works very well for me.

---

Just out of interest, how long does lame take to encode files using your settings? (and what spec is the machine?)

I just find it hard to believe that on my 300MHz P2 (with 384MB RAM!) lame is still estimating 40 minutes to encode a 6 minute .wav - admittedly it's running Win98SE, but even that can't be the problem!!

I know about the reported problems with Audiocatalyst, but it ripped and encoded a CD faster than the playing time. EAC & lame (at the minute) is taking about 5 hours to do one disc... it's getting to be an overnight job to rip a couple of CDs!!

I must be doing something very wrong!

Geoff
---- -------
Got one of the first Mark 2 empegs...

I recommend Easy cd-da

I tried audio catalyst but it was hard to get to work because it requires aspi plus easy cd-da gives free updates

32Gig MK2 In 2001 VW Golf TDI

Just out of interest, how long does lame take to encode files using your settings? (and what spec is the machine?)



I'm ripping at approximately 5x realtime (Pioneer DVD drive). Encoding is being done at about 1.75x realtime on my main (at the house) fileserver.

Now, Specs... that machine is a Dual P3 550, .5G ram, with significant drive IO.

I'm ripping with abcde (a better CD encoder), which pulls the tracks as fast as cdparanoia can get them (as perfectly as possible), and then fires off encoders in the background to process the files. So, a full CD takes around 20-25 minutes to encode, thanks to the 2 processors.

I can't see lame taking that long to encode a file on a 300mhz... It's certainly not going to do it realtime at VBR, but I don't get it taking that long... I'll run a test on my backup server and see what it does...

Ok... Did a quick test on my backup server (P2 300, 128M ram)

Ripped an ~5 minute track, fed it to lame with -m a -q 2 -h -v -V 2 -b 96 -k as the options...

Encoding at .6599x realtime... so, about 8 minutes.

This is with the most recent version of lame, on a Debian linux box.

Gotta say something is up with your setup...

i can do direct CD to mp3 rips at 8-9x. am using audiograbber and lame set to 192 High Quality. set on normal quality i get about 13x

Machine is 1.2GHz Athlon, 512mb, Teac 32x SCSI CD-Rom

almost my exact setup, i have a 1.3 with more ram, and i am using audio catalyst as it came packaged. i get 9x-10x usually(cd in good shape)