Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#78751 - 08/03/2002 14:46 New bass / treble functionality
fusto
addict

Registered: 27/12/2001
Posts: 504
Loc: Lummi Island, WA
I posted this on the wish list and my wish was granted just yesterday, so I figured I'd move it on over here to programming.
Heres the background if your curious.

I've downloaded the kernel and with a little help have successfully set the number 9 and 10 EQ channels to the recommended settings.
Set the ninth band of each channel to have dB=0, f=100Hz, q=0.2 and the tenth band to have dB=0, f=10KHz, q=0.2

Now remember I'm totally ignorant so I'm probably going to make an ass of myself, but whatever...

The frequency settings I assume are for the bass and treble range adjustments, so If I wanted more or less bass from my increment changes in the bass slider in Hijack I could change that frequency to something else, right?
Bass is low frequencies so the 100hz setting on channel 9 is for the bass settings right?
If I did want to change it whats the theoretical maximum or minimum that I would use? 200hz? 50hz? And what about treble?
And on the same topic how did you (genixia) come up with your default recommendations?

I'm not really sure how all this works, I just know that it does and I'm thrilled.
I'll probably never change the recomended settings, but I'm still curious.

Thanks, again genixia!

Z~
_________________________
...all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by.

Top
#78752 - 08/03/2002 14:49 Re: New bass / treble functionality [Re: fusto]
fusto
addict

Registered: 27/12/2001
Posts: 504
Loc: Lummi Island, WA
_________________________
...all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by.

Top
#78753 - 08/03/2002 15:24 Re: New bass / treble functionality [Re: fusto]
genixia
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 08/02/2002
Posts: 3411
Put my settings down to experience, guesstimate and trial & error. I studied electronics and worked as a sound tech at university, so that gave me a starting point.

Q factor is defined as f/bandwidth, where the bandwidth is delimited by the -3dB points. So if you're adding +3db, you'll get a 2nd order parametric curve that ranges from 0dB gain at f-(BW/2) to +3dB at f and back down to 0dB at f+(BW/2)

With my suggested values, that means the -3dB points should be -150Hz and 350Hz for the bass, and -40KHz and 60KHz for the treble, which looks really wrong, but certainly doesn't sound that wrong. I'm getting more convinced that there is a bug in the player's eq code. The fact that the Q defaults to 0.55 is strange...

Anyway I'm still looking into these values and the player behaviour. It'll be interesting to see what the consensus is on the best values to use. I wouldn't push bass below 75 or above 200, likewise 6KHz and 12KHz for treble.

I'm going to have to download a white noise file to my empeg and dig out that FFT program on my laptop soon...



_________________________
Mk2a 60GB Blue. Serial 030102962 sig.mp3: File Format not Valid.

Top