Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#164693 - 08/06/2003 18:00 Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
Items in the Crutchfield catalog for a long time, but I stupidly did not notice until today:

OmniFi DMS1

OmniFi MP1

Discuss.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#164694 - 08/06/2003 18:30 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: tfabris]
robricc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
Looks interesting. I'm sure it won't work as smooth as they make it out to be. Transfering MP3s over 802.11b is slow as hell... not to mention the receiving device being in the garage (or in the driveway).

I'd love to see it in action though.

_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736

Top
#164695 - 08/06/2003 21:45 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: robricc]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
Gee, that system diagram looks eerily familiar. I wonder if there are any other products that'll work like that?
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#164696 - 12/06/2003 01:45 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: robricc]
JaBZ
addict

Registered: 08/08/2001
Posts: 452
Loc: NZ
good concept, but transferring over 802.11b is DAMN slow, 802.11a or g would be better.

Top
#164697 - 12/06/2003 06:12 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: JaBZ]
robricc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
802.11a or g would be better
802.11a wouldn't make it through the walls of your house and/or car and G is really flakey right now.
_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736

Top
#164698 - 12/06/2003 07:56 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: robricc]
Daria
carpal tunnel

Registered: 24/01/2002
Posts: 3937
Loc: Providence, RI
I routinely transfer over 802.11b, as long as you're not trying to upload your collection instead of an album it's tolerable.

Top
#164699 - 12/06/2003 10:23 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: Daria]
robricc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
In my experience, 10baseT is 2-3 times faster than 802.11b. Moving more than a couple albums at a time is horribly slow.

802.11a on the other hand is wicked fast.

802.11g is fast... when it works.
_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736

Top
#164700 - 12/06/2003 10:44 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: robricc]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
In my experience, 10baseT is 2-3 times faster than 802.11b.
You know, it's funny how we're supposed to judge transfer speed based on the "MBPS" rating of the equipment, and it never seems to really go by that number.

10baseT=10mbps/sec
802.11b=11mbps/sec
USB=12mbps/sec

But actual data throughput ends up being exactly the opposite order...
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#164701 - 10/11/2003 13:27 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: tfabris]
svferris
addict

Registered: 06/11/2001
Posts: 700
Loc: San Diego, CA, USA
These appear to be launching this week (according to Crutchfield and other press releases).

http://www.omnifimedia.com/home/
_________________________
__________________ Scott MKIIa 10GB - 2.0b11 w/Hijack MKIIa 60GB - 2.0 final w/Hijack

Top
#164702 - 10/11/2003 20:44 Re: Rockford Fosgate Wireless stuff [Re: tfabris]
tman
carpal tunnel

Registered: 24/12/2001
Posts: 5528
All of the wireless LAN technologies quote the signalling rate. The maximum actual throughput is half the quoted rate.

So with 802.11b you're looking to get about 4-5mbps and 802.11a/g is around 25. Some manufacturers implement their own systems and double the standard rates.

Overhead is greatest on 802.11b then USB and finally Ethernet has the lowest. You'll never get the full bandwidth because the protocol being used sucks up some of it.

Top