If you'll remember, one of my complaints is that they continually stated that they had good intelligence supporting their claims, but then refused to tell us what any of it was. Many of you apologists claimed that it was because it might damage war efforts. Well, the war, by all accounts, is basically over. Any remaining fighting is certainly not centrally controlled, and there's no reason that intelligence should continue to be hidden, except for the potentiality that it doesn't exist.

Quick clarification - the damage of revealing any intelligence received isn't limited to a 'war effort'. The damage extends further than that. There is a very real possibility of compromising that intelligence source. If that source is compromised, it because useless (in the event the source is technology), or terminated (in the event it is HUMINT).

Personally, I'm surprised they let out as much information as they did during Powell's speech to the UN.