Why for and how come is this not a copyright concern? This sounds like a "photocopy" of a published article. I'm not trying to be difficult but it seems kind of like selective interpretation to me. We seem to have lots of "police" here and sometimes they are kind of anally rigid, and sometimes not!!!

I'm interested to hear if there is a quasi-legal distinction in this case. Personally, I do not really object to disseminating technical information this way as long as it is not for profit.

Lynn