Really. I've never heard of anyone judging a university on the quality of the university-provided entertainment before. Lack of local drinking establishments and nude nightclubs, yes, but student union, no.

Yeah, the university I went to didn't even have a student union in any real sense (there was a stationery shop, but that was basically it). Of course, the fatal flaw in that theory is that the rest of Cambridge didn't have any decent nightlife in those days either. What was I thinking?

Peter