Any New Jemplode Considerations? | Programming

You are not logged in. [Log In] empegbbs.com » Forums » empeg-car » Programming » Any New Jemplode Considerations?

Topic Options

#184570 - 15/10/2003 10:34 Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations? [Re: Terminator]
jbauer veteran Registered: 08/05/2000 Posts: 1429 Loc: San Francisco, CA	I've been praying for him to add genre and year into the tags of files downloaded through Jemplode... Seems like an easy fix...? - Jon
Top

Previous Topic

Index

Next Topic

Entire topic
Subject	Posted by	Posted
Any New Jemplode Considerations?	TedP	15/10/2003 07:50
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	Terminator	15/10/2003 08:28
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	jbauer	15/10/2003 10:34
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mcomb	15/10/2003 15:20
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mschrag	15/10/2003 15:39
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	jbauer	15/10/2003 15:39
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mcomb	15/10/2003 15:45
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	jbauer	15/10/2003 16:01
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mcomb	15/10/2003 16:06
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mlord	15/10/2003 16:15
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	tfabris	15/10/2003 16:20
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mlord	15/10/2003 16:28
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mschrag	15/10/2003 20:39
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mlord	15/10/2003 20:45
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	jbauer	15/10/2003 16:17
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	jbauer	16/10/2003 14:31
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mschrag	16/10/2003 14:53
Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mlord	16/10/2003 15:40
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	crazymelki	16/10/2003 22:27
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mschrag	17/10/2003 07:11
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mlord	17/10/2003 08:35
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mlord	17/10/2003 08:38
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mschrag	17/10/2003 09:33
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mlord	17/10/2003 11:37
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	wfaulk	17/10/2003 11:39
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mlord	17/10/2003 11:45
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mschrag	17/10/2003 14:15
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mlord	17/10/2003 16:55
Re: Hijack v345: workaround for JEmplode (?)	mlord	17/10/2003 16:58
Re: Any New Jemplode Considerations?	mschrag	15/10/2003 10:43