Yeah, I've given up hope on the Foveon getting anywhere. It's sad, really, because the technology is, IMHO, far superior -- or, rather, it could be, if it was allocated the same amount of development dollars that are pouring into CMOS and CCD development.

Quote:
So long as the resulting image is beautiful, do you really care how it got that way?

No, I suppose not. It's just that the geek in me is disturbed by the way CCD and CMOS have to do the sampling to get the final image -- I could be getting even more beautiful pictures.