No, I didn't say that. I said I don't trust them. I agreed with you that the evidence was far from concrete.

And DDoSing someone's server is very different from attempting to spy on a specific Stanford student's GMail account. At least in my book.

So dude, chill. I think I'm agreeing with you more than you're seeing. I'd like more evidence but I concede that there's not as much as they said there was. What I said was that to me it seems more likely that China did it, whether ordered by their government or not, than some third party.

And no, I didn't read the very last line in the article (I did read the rest, thanks very much). My brain is usually wired to skip italicized text at the very end of articles like that. I'm glad they mentioned what was updated, though I don't like that particular method. I much prefer to see the article as it originally was, and then have the additional information later and separately, rather than interspersed through the article. It makes it very hard for people to comment on news stories if the content changes.