#194971 - 25/12/2003 08:56
A better in-car display technology? (from ForSale)
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 19/09/2002
Posts: 2494
Loc: East Coast, USA
|
(moved this reply from ForSale to here to avoid jacking the thread)
Bitt: "Actually, the one thing that makes it not perfect to me is the VFD. There are much better display technologies for in-car. And that's not at all interesting to discuss."
Bitt, I'm curious. What better in-car displays are there than a bright, ultra-fast refreshing, infinite (?) viewing angle VFD? Sure, it's fragile and single color (excluding shades), but is LCD better? Don't LCD's have slower refresh times (causing ghosting and blurryness, etc), finite viewing angle, and just look "flat" and "dull"? Some have color, but aren't they pricey right now?
Is there another display technology besides LCD for in-car display? I'm curious so I can put it on my list of required specs for my "next" in-dash MP3 player. Thanks.
_________________________
- FireFox31 110gig MKIIa (30+80), Eutronix lights, 32 meg stacked RAM, Filener orange gel lens, Greenlights Lit Buttons green set
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194972 - 25/12/2003 09:08
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: FireFox31]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14493
Loc: Canada
|
All of the stereos I've ever had in my dash all used VFDs, except for one LCD based one that didn't survive its first winter here in Canada.
(Well, okay, my first two cars had sliders and light bulbs rather than nifty electronic displays, but they hardly count here).
-ml
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194973 - 25/12/2003 12:29
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: FireFox31]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 13/01/2002
Posts: 1649
Loc: Louisiana, USA
|
There is organic EL used in some displays now and OLED is coming soon.
Stu
_________________________
If you want it to break, buy Sony!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194974 - 26/12/2003 11:02
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: maczrool]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
That's mostly what I was thinking of, but I'm pretty sure that technology didn't even exist when the empeg was developed. It's still pretty new. However, even if a better technology didn't exist, the VFD is bad enough in bright sunlight to prevent the empeg from being perfect.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194975 - 26/12/2003 12:38
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/05/2001
Posts: 2616
Loc: Bruges, Belgium
|
Hugo has mentioned once that, when they were developing the Empeg, they had been looking into using organic-EL display screens. But at that time that screen technology was still in it's infancy stages. It was considered not stable enough and the decision was made to use VFD's instead.
_________________________
Riocar 80gig S/N : 010101580 red Riocar 80gig (010102106) - backup
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194976 - 26/12/2003 13:26
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForSale)
[Re: FireFox31]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 09/06/2003
Posts: 297
|
Something that doesn't completely wash out in angled sunlight would be nice...
-brendan
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194977 - 02/01/2004 18:06
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForSale)
[Re: brendanhoar]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2001
Posts: 71
Loc: Alice Springs - Australia
|
Is it the Blue Filter on my VFD? I find I can read it ok in sunlight (or at least the slight shade of the car) but when I put on my Sunglasses I can't read a thing, not a thing (they are not blueblockers, hehehe) I find myself lifting my sunnies often to make player changes, anyone have a best color filter that improves the readability of the VFD in Daylight? I might change colors just for that reason, Gazz, Alice Springs.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194978 - 02/01/2004 18:46
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForSale)
[Re: Gazz]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 15/08/2000
Posts: 4859
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
The only thing better in sunlight is a light smoke or clear. Anything else is darker because the VFD is naturally cyan in color.
_________________________
Paul Grzelak 200GB with 48MB RAM, Illuminated Buttons and Digital Outputs
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194979 - 03/01/2004 01:19
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: Gazz]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
when I put on my Sunglasses I can't read a thing, not a thing (they are not blueblockers, hehehe)
Even though not Blueblockers, it depends on the color of the lenses. I use the blue lense, and with a pair of sunglasses with a reddish/brown tint I can hardly see anything on the display even in shadow. But with a pair with bluish tint I have no problem seeing it even in fair to strong light.
/Michael
_________________________
/Michael
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194980 - 03/01/2004 02:22
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: mtempsch]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2001
Posts: 71
Loc: Alice Springs - Australia
|
Wow!, ok, so sunglasses can make a big difference
Can you see me taking the Empeg into a shop to test various sunglasses.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194981 - 03/01/2004 07:18
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: Gazz]
|
old hand
Registered: 20/07/1999
Posts: 1102
Loc: UK
|
Unfortunately, yes Empeg owners seem capable of anything!
pca
_________________________
Experience is what you get just after it would have helped...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194982 - 03/01/2004 09:17
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForSale)
[Re: Gazz]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
I wonder if the AR coating on the lens might also be polarizing, and if it is, if it might be polarizing in a direction orthogonal to the polarization of your sunglasses.
Of course, it's probably more likely that it's just the color being filtered out.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194983 - 03/01/2004 14:02
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: wfaulk]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
I don't think it's polarizing - my blue sunglasses are polarizing and yes, I've rotated them in front of the player with the stock blue AR coated lens, and didn't note any difference depending on orientation.
/Michael
_________________________
/Michael
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194984 - 08/01/2004 10:09
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForSale)
[Re: Gazz]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12338
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
I'm not sure what version of the player you have, or which versions this problem occurred in, but my display was very dim when I got my player. I had to return it to have the display fixed and when I got it back I had absolutely no problems reading the display at any time of day.
I think one problem is that since the empeg is so rare, some people may have this problem and have nothing to compare their display to, so they can't tell if it's normal or not.
Again, this might just be an early-on problem. My player was in the first "batch" of Mk2s, so I don't know if the problem occured again.
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#194985 - 08/01/2004 13:06
Re: A better in-car display technology? (from ForS
[Re: mtempsch]
|
new poster
Registered: 29/12/2003
Posts: 8
|
skiiers wear orange/red/brown sunglasses/goggles becuase they block lots of blue light and thus increase contrast on the slopes. Those lenses will block most of the light coming from a blue display, making it mostly unreadable.
Blue lenses, however, let blue light through, and would be ideal for reading a blue display.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|