RMML 20040721 | General | unofficial empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

You are not logged in. [Log In] empegbbs.com » Forums » Rio Hard Drive Portables » General » RMML 20040721

Topic Options

#228105 - 21/07/2004 23:27 RMML 20040721
mschrag pooh-bah Registered: 09/09/2000 Posts: 2303 Loc: Richmond, VA	Does anyone read this forum and NOT read Riovolution? Do I need to dual post here?
Top

#228106 - 21/07/2004 23:46 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: mschrag]
tman carpal tunnel Registered: 24/12/2001 Posts: 5528	Me
Top

#228107 - 22/07/2004 00:41 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: mschrag]
Daria carpal tunnel Registered: 24/01/2002 Posts: 3937 Loc: Providence, RI	I don't read riovolution. I probably should.
Top

#228108 - 22/07/2004 01:18 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: mschrag]
Micman2b addict Registered: 27/12/2001 Posts: 441 Loc: Central, NC, USA	I skim it once a week to see if there is anything interesting in between the unnecessary posts.. Sean in NC
Top

#228109 - 22/07/2004 01:30 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: Micman2b]
tman carpal tunnel Registered: 24/12/2001 Posts: 5528	Just had a look at the Karma forum and the majority seem to be about how there is a new iPod and the lack of a new Karma. A large proportion of the users on Riovolution have huge avatar pictures and even larger banners at the end of their posts. Ick The only vaguely interesting part was about the 40GB upgrades. Nothing really amazing or complicated though. It seems you just buy a new drive online, crack the Karma open, swap the drives and then get your dremel out.
Top

#228110 - 22/07/2004 01:38 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: mschrag]
msaeger carpal tunnel Registered: 23/09/2000 Posts: 3608 Loc: Minnetonka, MN	I am not a riovolution reader. _________________________ Matt
Top

#228111 - 22/07/2004 04:19 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: msaeger]
jmullan new poster Registered: 08/01/2004 Posts: 13	I only read riovolution when someone mentions it here. Should I go there now? Is there anything there for which I should be looking?
Top

#228112 - 22/07/2004 04:57 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: mschrag]
tfabris carpal tunnel Registered: 20/12/1999 Posts: 31600 Loc: Seattle, WA	Yes. Please dual-post here. _________________________ Tony Fabris
Top

#228113 - 22/07/2004 09:49 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: tfabris]
Micman2b addict Registered: 27/12/2001 Posts: 441 Loc: Central, NC, USA	I have even refered one topic from over there to be reposted here, the remote post. They are looking for whether the remote port is activated in the software. I think Rob here stated that it could be if a product was actually being worked on, or something like that... Sean in NC
Top

#228114 - 23/07/2004 01:16 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: Micman2b]
daPyr0x stranger Registered: 14/03/2004 Posts: 43	Yeah... They won't enable the support unless someone is working on a remote; but nobody can work on a remote without support for it... Wow, now that's circular logic, wouldn't you say so? Can't design a remote without firmware support to test it with (thus coming far before the stages of manufacturing anything); and they won't enable firmware support without someone manufacturing something.
Top

#228115 - 23/07/2004 03:21 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: daPyr0x]
PeterDLai journeyman Registered: 04/07/2003 Posts: 57 Loc: San Diego, CA, USA	I read neither, but I'm still waiting for the next line of HDD players.
Top

#228116 - 23/07/2004 03:22 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: PeterDLai]
PeterDLai journeyman Registered: 04/07/2003 Posts: 57 Loc: San Diego, CA, USA	I was here around the time the Rio Karma was being released. I remember someone sneaking a picture or two of the Karma before release. That's not going to happen this time, is it?
Top

#228117 - 23/07/2004 20:48 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: daPyr0x]
number6 old hand Registered: 30/04/2001 Posts: 745 Loc: In The Village or sometimes: A...	Quote: Yeah... They won't enable the support unless someone is working on a remote; but nobody can work on a remote without support for it... Wow, now that's circular logic, wouldn't you say so? Can't design a remote without firmware support to test it with (thus coming far before the stages of manufacturing anything); and they won't enable firmware support without someone manufacturing something. No I think you're reading this wrongly. The statement about this should be read as follows: They won't enable the support unless someone is working on an Officially SanctionedTM remote for the Karma. Thats a big difference.
Top

#228118 - 23/07/2004 21:15 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: number6]
daPyr0x stranger Registered: 14/03/2004 Posts: 43	cough "third party" cough
Top

#228119 - 24/07/2004 13:19 Re: RMML 20040721 [Re: number6]
rob carpal tunnel Registered: 21/05/1999 Posts: 5335 Loc: Cambridge UK	I haven't heard from anyone expressing any interest in manufacturing a remote control for the Karma. We certainly wouldn't hold back a third party who was realistically interested in doing so. Rob
Top

View All Topics