http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_04/html/new_10_21_04.html#1

Things like the conclusions of the 9/11 commission aren't subjective; You can have an opinion of the validity of their conclusions, but not what their conclusions were. Those were published and thus verifiable.

So (assuming this is true; I lack a sufficient sample size to prove it) what's the problem? Is the media lying to us, or what?