#215825 - 26/08/2004 22:34
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: SE_Sport_Driver]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
Quote:
I (personally) havn't had much luck shipping to Canada lately
I can ship it for you if you want. I'm probably going to Montreal Sept. 11th, so I can even mail it from within Canada most likely.
_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215826 - 26/08/2004 22:43
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: SE_Sport_Driver]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14493
Loc: Canada
|
I think genixia may also be offering to do the soldering.. He's in the Boston area, give or take 30 miles.
Cheers
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215827 - 26/08/2004 22:46
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: robricc]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14493
Loc: Canada
|
Quote:
I'm probably going to Montreal Sept. 11th
Damn.. I'm just down the road from there (about 2 hours at legal speeds..), but the 11th is our major GeoCaching event here.
I'll be spending much of that 24 hours running around using very expensive billion-dollar military hardware to find tupperware and film containers hidden in this area.
Cheers
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215828 - 27/08/2004 00:24
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: robricc]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
|
I'm about a 30min drive from Ontario, so I guess I could do the same thing...
genexia didn't get back to me last time I asked, but that was months ago... maybe I should try again?
All of this is assuming Justin ever gets me my player.
Paul, are you saying 32 is nice buy 48 is better or what? hehe
Edited by SE_Sport_Driver (27/08/2004 00:28)
_________________________
Brad B.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215829 - 27/08/2004 00:55
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
I'll be back up there October 16th probably with nothing to do during the day. We should meet-up then.
_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215830 - 27/08/2004 01:11
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: robricc]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14493
Loc: Canada
|
So what's with all the Saturday's in Mount Royal.. cute kaybecker gotcher eye?
Cheers
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215831 - 27/08/2004 04:09
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
cute kaybecker gotcher eye?
I miss those, down here. 
Maybe you can package one up and send her down for me? One of those cute climbers that hit on you would be okay -- lotsa climbing available down here. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215832 - 27/08/2004 10:32
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: canuckInOR]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 15/08/2000
Posts: 4859
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
Reading and commenting in flat mode, so this may cross a few subthreads... What better use is there for multi billion dollar military hardware?!  I do not know if 48MB gives significant benefits over 32MB, but it certainly has not hurt anything...
_________________________
Paul Grzelak
200GB with 48MB RAM, Illuminated Buttons and Digital Outputs
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215833 - 27/08/2004 10:35
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: canuckInOR]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14493
Loc: Canada
|
Quote:
One of those cute climbers that hit on you
Like this one? (attached)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215834 - 27/08/2004 10:36
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 15/08/2000
Posts: 4859
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
SWMBO???
_________________________
Paul Grzelak
200GB with 48MB RAM, Illuminated Buttons and Digital Outputs
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215835 - 27/08/2004 10:41
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: pgrzelak]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14493
Loc: Canada
|
Quote:
SWMBO???
Naw, she's not keen on pink anything, let alone fuzzy undies! And SWMBO doesn't wear a climbing helmet, except on ice.
Cheers
Edited by mlord (27/08/2004 10:43)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215836 - 29/08/2004 00:18
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
One of those cute climbers that hit on youQuote:
Like this one? (attached)
Do you have a big enough box, or should I ship one up?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215837 - 29/08/2004 00:55
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: canuckInOR]
|
addict
Registered: 25/06/2002
Posts: 456
|
Sooooo... being in LA, I'll assume you're quite familiar with American slang.
Would you like to rethink your wording on that?
Unless you actually.... Oh, never mind.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215838 - 03/09/2004 12:25
Re: Mark 2A memory upgrade chip sets (16->32MB)
[Re: pgrzelak]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/09/2003
Posts: 50
|
So.. I finally have a second empeg on its way to me.. Am I too late to get some of this memory action? I didn't want to do any soldering on my mission-critical primary empeg.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215839 - 03/09/2004 12:28
Re: Mark 2A memory upgrade chip sets (16->32MB)
[Re: Defiler]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 15/08/2000
Posts: 4859
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
Plenty of chips left. As for soldering, that would be your own (or someone else's) doing.
_________________________
Paul Grzelak
200GB with 48MB RAM, Illuminated Buttons and Digital Outputs
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215840 - 03/09/2004 12:35
Re: Mark 2A memory upgrade chip sets (16->32MB)
[Re: pgrzelak]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/09/2003
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Plenty of chips left. As for soldering, that would be your own (or someone else's) doing.
Awesome. Cash is on the way via Paypal.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215841 - 04/10/2004 15:18
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: pgrzelak]
|
addict
Registered: 11/01/2001
Posts: 579
|
An upgrade Board HUmmmm I have to know what upgrades will be on it ? Quote:
Greetings!
But I must let you know (if you didn't already) that Patrick is working on an upgrade board. If you are interested in the chips, let me know.
_________________________
______________________________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of Network
Administrators, for they are subtle and quick to
anger.
______________________________________
Worlds Lamest Wb Site (mine)
http://home.comcast.net/~jlipchitz/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215842 - 04/10/2004 19:20
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: belezeebub]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
|
Just RAM.
_________________________
Brad B.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215844 - 05/10/2004 01:09
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
And, ummm.... top posting is kinda a Bad Thing.
It's funny, my wife and I had that religious discussion about an email I replied to. She prefers top posting (aka bottom quoting), and I'm used to the opposite.
Does that mean our marriage is doomed to failure?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215845 - 05/10/2004 02:50
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Search for "top posting" and make her read any of those pages about why it's a bad, if not stupid, idea. Then divorce her.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215847 - 05/10/2004 05:29
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
I guess my issue with it is this: there's a standard involved. It's set. Has been for some time. Like not randomly capitalizing words. Just isn't done.
Yeah, I tried that one. She says that everyone who she exchanges emails with does it the other way around, and therefore I'm the one not following the standard.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215848 - 05/10/2004 09:53
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
|
I prefer top posting for email and bottom for forums.... <shrug>
_________________________
Brad B.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215850 - 05/10/2004 16:29
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Email only top posts since the rise of Microsoft in the internet scene. Before then, everyone bottom posted emails, too.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215851 - 05/10/2004 16:34
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: wfaulk]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
Email only top posts since the rise of Microsoft in the internet scene. Before then, everyone bottom posted emails, too.
You know....I have to admit that I haven't thought about email in the old days since....well, since the old days. But you're right (of course)!
I think the reason top posting doesn't bother me in email (I actually prefer it) is that it's usually a two-way conversation. I already know what I just wrote, but it's nice to have it for a reference if I need it.
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215852 - 05/10/2004 16:48
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
I understand but disagree. To me, if you needed reference, don't delete the old email. This way, people just keep adding new stuff and new stuff to an email until you get to the point where you're transmitting 100kB to say "Yes". Which brings me to the notion of people writing emails in Word and sending the Word doc as an attachment in order to say yes. That seems less prevalent now than a few years back; I guess MS must have fixed Outlook, since you can still use Word as your email message editor, though why you'd want to do that I have no idea.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215853 - 05/10/2004 16:58
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: wfaulk]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
I understand but disagree. To me, if you needed reference, don't delete the old email. This way, people just keep adding new stuff and new stuff to an email until you get to the point where you're transmitting 100kB to say "Yes".
Fair enough. In all honesty, this was more important to me when I was still working in IT. I was at Comcast, and we had very strict email removal rules (ie. no storing it, servers deleted mail very quickly, etc). Can't subpeona what isn't there.
Quote:
Which brings me to the notion of people writing emails in Word and sending the Word doc as an attachment in order to say yes.
Agreed, very VERY annoying. I used to just delete those messages and tell people I didn't get it.
Quote:
That seems less prevalent now than a few years back; I guess MS must have fixed Outlook, since you can still use Word as your email message editor, though why you'd want to do that I have no idea.
I believe (and could easily be wrong) that if you "use Word as your message editor" in the most current version (and maybe other recent versions) of Outlook, it simply uses the Word engine. I've seen winword.exe in peoples process listing even when they only have Outlook open.
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#215854 - 05/10/2004 18:36
Re: Memory Bump
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
|
I like being able to read an email right away without having to Page Down a few times. But, to be honest, I'd rather just have the original message not inserted into replies. Perhaps if I did a lot of work related email, I'd prefer having all of it "there" but it's not neccessary for personal stuff IMHO.
_________________________
Brad B.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
