Even so, you thought that accepting discipline was important. That in itself at least implies the fact that you think subservience is important (to some extent). The question wasn't ``dealing with discipline'', but ``accepting discipline''.

I think that everything should be questioned. The reasoned answer may not be different from what happened, but simple acceptance implies a bent towards authoritarianism.

Of course, people tend to think too much about questions on such tests, so that one may not have ended up being valid for you. But that's why they have so many questions.

Oh, and I thought that most of the questions that I was ambivalent on were worded in such a way as to make ``disagree'' a fairly ambivalent answer.


Edited by wfaulk (12/06/2003 19:50)
_________________________
Bitt Faulk