No. You're missing the point. It's not about being open to hacking, it's about being an open and welcoming experience.
"Open to hacking?" When was that the definition of "open?" That's what I'm talking about. I completely understand what you're
saying you and this kid are defining "open" to be, but you were missing
my point, which is that it isn't what anyone has definined "open" to be up to this point. This wouldn't be a problem because I agree with what you're saying about the welcoming experience, except that you're using this new definition as an argument against the previous definition.
*edit*
naturally, I'll take this discussion to Tom's new thread