The sad thing is: it appears as though the judge in this case is going by the fact that the girls weren't actually naked in the photos (they were wearing bras). That makes it quite easy: Throw out the case, restrain the prosecutor, tell him to go bark up another tree. Yeah. But what if they *had* been naked? Then the legal side of it would have been much thornier. I would hope the judge would have behaved the same way, but I fear that he wouldn't have. Even though the reality of the situation would have been the same, bras or no bras.

I hope this case sets precedents that make it less criminal to have teenage hormones.