It still remains that the app is a dictionary and whether or not it includes one or al of the words mentioned, or additional urban slang, it should not receive a 17+ rating. Real paper dictionaries don't and other industries, such as the movie industrs, don't rate their wares with such an iron fist and so little wiggle room.
Agreed. And I never understand when they use this reasoning, while at the same time all the same content and FAR worse is easily accessible via mobile Safari.
And it's not like Apple hasn't misused the "objectionable content" rejection before. Didn't they do that to a Twitter app, because they saw a swear word in a random tweet?
Previous Topic
Index
