The primary arguement used by Bush was that Saddam had WMD's and that they are trained on the US and other countries. We have yet to see any evidence of these WMD's despite the 'dossier' shown to many governments.
Now the claims are that Saddam's capture is a great benefit to the Iraqi people. No mention of WMD's.
I did hear someone say that now Saddam would lead them to the WMD's.
Didn't the US have 'credible evidence' of the location of WMD's? If they couldn't find them before, despite this evidence, why will they be able to find them now?
_________________________
--
Murray
I What part of 'no' don't you understand?
Is it the 'N', or the 'Zero'?