All I can say here is that my argument is consistent all the way through each of the posts. Your argument is self serving, and I am not arguing what you are arguing. You are simply talking about something not at all related to what I'm talking about, in this way, you're missing my point.

Also when did I say the ONLY reason anyone and everyone creates music is to get paid? I never said that, ever. I suppose I can argue your way:

You see, I was talking about consequences of raising the bandwidth ceiling, the desires of artists and albums is a completely separate point from your album theory, and I was saying that because you seemed to be saying that no artist will ever want any money because they produce music for the good of all mankind and the happy shininess within them that drives them to sign contracts with recording companies--of course, you're still missing the point--artists blah blah, and as for that, my point was simply because since blah blah blah executives still want money they will get it and that I understand that there are people who don't want single songs since most people such as you want 95% of music on albums, so in short, it's better to buy full albums? I suppose. But that's only an opinion, and it does sound a bit crazy. blah.

Calvin "clipping and quoting DiGNAN out of context in order to create a run on sentence"