I can't continue this discussion if you're going to keep making arguments that have already been rebutted by a source I've already linked to, and I refuse to play whack-a-mole with your straw man $100/hr hypothetical when I've cited data points in the world we actually live in.

The paper I cited above lists eleven ways that business owners can respond to an increased minimum wage, and none of them is "eliminate the jobs." You can disagree with the points made, but trying to extrapolate from a hypothetical $100/hr wage to argue against a much more modest increase is dirty pool.