Damn, you should really stop ASSuming. The fact is that you CAN own "knowledge" - you can own information. You can own an IDEA or a CONCEPT. A design, a method, an algorithm, a process. That's the whole idea behind INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

Your arguments are meaningless. They're not arguments at all becaue you propose no information based on fact. Not even on educated hypothesis. The only fact is that you don't know what you're talking about. And you try and bend rules and laws that exist today, around the world, simply because you don't understand them.

"This law is meaningless because X and Y are meaningless." The problem is that "X" and "Y" are meaningless only to YOU.

Remember the other very important catch-all. Ignorance is NOT a defence. Remember that one when you're in front of a judge. Which I suspect you will be at some point.

Bruno