It is certainly within your rights to disagree with me, but, IMO, even that is beside the point. My real point is that even if you assume for a second that he's not a Christian -- ignore his professions -- and look at his record, it doesn't seem to be very Christian, and if your basis for choosing a candidate is that he be Christian, I think that actions should speak louder than words. And his actions seem to indicate that if he is a Christian, he's one that seems to be stuck in the ages of Urban II and Innocent III.