No, that would be a statement about what is science and what isn't, based on the definition of science used by essentially all actual scientists. Dan's post above sets out pretty clearly what something has to be in order to be science: a rational (i.e. constructed from logic) system of gathering knowledge based on falsifiable hypothesis tested by experiment.

While there are some who would claim that nothing extrarational is true, that in itself isn't the argument against Dinosaurs By Design. The point we're making there is that nothing extrarational is science.

Peter